Doing Research that Makes a Difference

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2004, Pages

  Bensimon, Estela Mara ^a,b   Polkinghorne, Donald E ^b   Bauman, Georgia L ^b   Vallejo, Edlyn ^c  

^a Center for Urban Education   (United States)

^b Rossier School Education   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642361842     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2004.11778898     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bauman, G. L. (2002). Developing a culture of evidence: Using institutional data to identify inequitable educational outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
2. Bauman, G. L., & Bensimon, E. M. (2002). The promotion of organizational learning through the use of routine data. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education conference, November. Sacramento, CA.
3. Bensimon, E. M., & Neumann, A. (1993). Redesigning collegiate leadership: Teams and teamwork in higher education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Birnbaum R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Bray, J. N., Lee, J., Smith, L. L., & Yorks, L. (2000). Collaborative inquiry in practice: Action, reflection, and making meaning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. California Citizens Commission on Higher Education. (1998). A State of learning: California higher education in the twenty-first century (June). Blueprint for implementing the report of the California Citizens Commission on Higher Education. Los Angeles, CA.
8. Conrad, C. F. (1989). Meditations on the ideology of inquiry in higher education: Exposition, critique, and conjecture. Review of Higher Education, 12(3), 199-200.
9. Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Green, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). An introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Hall, S. (1992). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gielben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 276-320). Cambridge: Polity Press and Open University.
12. Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Huberman, M. (1999). The mind is its own place: The influence of sustained interactivity with practitioners on educational researchers. Harvard Educational Review, 69(3), 289-319.
14. Ibarra, R. A. (2001). Beyond affirmative action: Reframing the context of higher education. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15. Kaplan, R., & Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
16. Keller, G. (1985). Trees without fruit: The problem with research about higher education. Change, 17(1), 7-10.
17. Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. (2000). Moving beyond the gap between research and practice in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, no. 110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Layzell, D. T. (1990). Most research on higher education is stale, irrelevant, and of little use to policymakers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 37(8), pp. B1, B3.
19. Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E., Jr. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
20. Myers, D., Park, J., & Hacegaba, N. (2000) Reversing the shrinking middle and polarization in California's labor force: Report of a pilot investigation. Center for Urban Education and Population Research Laboratory, University of Southern California. Available at: http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/CUE/documents/MyersShrinking-Mid dlePaper.CUE.pdf
21. Nettles, M. T. (1995). The emerging national policy agenda on higher education assessment: A wake-up call. Review of Higher Education, 18(3), 293-313.
22. O'Neil, H. F., Jr., Bensimon, E. M., Diamond, M. A., & Moore, M. R. (1999). Designing and implementing an academic scorecard. Change, 31(6), 32-41.
23. Park, P. (1999). People, knowledge, and change in participatory research. Management Learning 30(2), 141-157.
24. Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 1-14). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Sassen, S. (1994). The urban complex in a world economy. International Social Science Journal, 46(1), 43-62.
27. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York and London: Zed Books Ltd. and Dunedin: Otago Press. (5th ed., 2000).
28. Stringer, E. T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29. Terenzini, P. T. (1996). Rediscovering roots: Public policy and higher education research. Review of Higher Education, 20(1), 5-13.
30. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.