Synthetic Creatinine Receptor: Imprinting of a Lewis Acidic Zinc(II)cyclen Binding Site to Shape Its Molecular Recognition Selectivity

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 3185-3190

  Subat, Michael ^a   Borovik, Andrew S ^b   König, Burkhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHYLENE; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PH EFFECTS; POLYMERIZATION; SOLUTIONS;

BINDING SITES; POLYMER SURFACES;

ZINC;

COPOLYMER; CREATININE; CREATININE RECEPTOR; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; ETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; LEWIS ACID; POLYMER; QUERCETIN; RECEPTOR; THYMINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC; ZINC CYCLEN; ZINC DERIVATIVE;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMICAL BINDING; COMPLEX FORMATION; MACROMOLECULE; METAL BINDING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PH; POLYMERIZATION;

CATIONS, DIVALENT; CREATININE; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS; KINETICS; METHACRYLATES; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; RIBOFLAVIN; ZINC;

EID: 1642339624     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja038980l     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Recent reviews: (a) Haupt, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 171-178.
2. (b) Alexander, C.; Davidson, L.; Hayes, W. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2025-2057.
3. (c) Mosbach, K.; Ramstrom, O. Biotechnology 1996, 14, 163.
4. (d) Davis, M. E.; Katz, A.; Ahmad, W. R. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 1820.
5. (e) Molecular and Ionic Recognition with Imprinted Polymers; Bartsch, R. A., Maeda, M., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 703; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1998.
6. (f) Haupt, K.; Mosbach, K. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2495.
7. (g) Molecular Imprinted Polymers: Man-Made Mimics of Antibodies and Their Applications in Analytical Chemistry; Sellergren, B., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2001.
8. (a) Wulff, G. Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1958-1979; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1812-1833.
9. (a) Wulff, G. Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1958-1979; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1812-1833.
10. (b) Emgenbroich, M.; Wulff, G. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4106-4117.
11. (a) Yamazaki, T.; Yilmaz, E.; Mosbach, K.; Sode, K. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 435, 209-214.
12. (b) Wu, L.; Li, Y. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 482, 175-181.
13. (c) Matsui, J.; Nicolls, I. A.; Takeuchi, T.; Mosbach, K.; Karube, I. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 335, 71-77.
14. (d) Dhal, P. K.; Arnold, F. H. New J. Chem. 1996, 20, 695-698.
15. (e) Fujii, Y.; Matsutani, K.; Kikuchi, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 415.
16. (f) Arnold, F. In Molecular and lonic Recognition with Imprinted Polymers; ACS Symposium Series 703; Bartsch, R. A., Maeda, M., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1998; p 109.
17. (g) Dhal, P. K.; Arnold, F. H. Macromolecules 1992, 25, 7051.
18. (h) De, B. B.; Lohray, B. B.; Sivaram, S.; Dhal, P. K. Macromolecules 1994, 27, 1291.
19. (i) Santora, B. P.; Larsen, A. O.; Gagné, M. R. Organometallics 1998, 17, 3138.
20. (k) Chen, H.; Olmstead, M. M.; Albright, R. L.; Devenyi, J.; Fish, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 642.
21. (l) Saunders, G. D.; Foxon, S. P.; Walton, P. H.; Joyce, M. J.; Port, S. N. Chem. Commun. 2000, 273.
22. (m) Brunkan, N. M.; Gagné, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6217.
23. (n) Padden, K. M.; Krebs, J. F.; Trafford, K. T.; Yap, G. P. A.; Rheingold, A. H.; Borovik, A. S.; Scarrow, R. C. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 4305
24. (a) Tada, M.; Iwasawa, Y. J. Mol. Catal. A 2003, 199, 115-137.
25. (b) Severin, K. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 710-714.
26. (a) Koenig, B.; Gallmeier, H.-G.; Reichenbach-Klinke, R. Chem. Com. 2001, 22, 2390-2391.
27. (b) Jiang, W.; Graham, B.; Spiccia, L.; Hearn, M. T. W. Anal. Biochem. 1998, 255, 47-58.
28. (c) Porath, J.; Carlsson, J.; Olsson, I.; Belfrage, G. Nature 1975, 258, 598-599.
29. (d) Porath, J.; Olin, B. Biochemistry 1983, 22, 1621-1630.
30. (e) Mallik, S.; Fazal, A. M.; Roy, B. C.; Sun, S.; Rodgers, K. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6283-6290.
31. (a) Hart, B. R.; Shea, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2072-2073.
32. (b) Hart, B. R.; Shea, K. J. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6192-6201.
33. (a) Matsui, J.; Higashi, M.; Takeuchi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5218-5219.
34. (b) Takeuchi, T.; Mukawa, T.; Matsui, J.; Higashi, M.; Shimizu, K. D. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 3869-3874.
35. Histamine binding to imprinted zinc(II)porphyrin: Tong, A.; Dong, H.; Li, L. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 466, 31-37.
36. A water-soluble polymer bound iron porphyrin as cytochrome c oxidase model was recently reported by Collman et al. No imprinting template was used in this work. Collman, J. P.; Fudickar, W.; Shiryaeva, I. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 3384-3386.
37. For a study aiming to identify carbohydrate-metal complex interactions, which may be used for imprinting processes, see: Striegler, S.; Tewes, E. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 487-495.
38. (a) Kimura, E.; Shiota, T.; Koike, T.; Shiro, M.; Kodama, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5805-5811.
39. (b) Koike, T.; Kimura, E.; Nakamura, I.; Hashimoto, Y.; Shiro, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7338-7345.
40. (c) Shionoya, M.; Ikeda, T.; Kimura, E.; Shiro, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3848-3859.
41. (d) Kikatu, E.; Murata, M.; Katsube, N.; Koike, T.; Kimura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5426-5436.
42. (e) Fujioka, H.; Koike, T.; Yamada, T.; Kimura, E. Heterocycles 1996, 42, 775-787.
43. (f) Koike, T.; Takashige, E.; Kimura, E.; Fujioka, H.; Shiro, M. Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2, 617-623.
44. (g) Kikuta, E.; Aoki, S.; Kimura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7911-7912.
45. (a) Shionoya, M.; Kimura, E.; Shiro, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6730-6737.
46. (b) Subat, M.; Koenig, B., unpublished results.
47. Comparison of the regioisomer ratio of meta and para in 4 and in product 5 shows that this has slightly changed. One of the isomers seems to be more reactive in the substitution reaction. Overlap of signals in the NMR spectra of 5 does not allow the determination of the exact regioisomer ratio.
48. (a) The tetraacetyl derivative of riboflavin is used because of its higher photostability and better solubility properties compared to riboflavin.
49. (b) Koenig, B.; Pelka, M.; Zieg, H.; Ritter, R.; Bouas-Laurent, H.; Bonneau, R.; Desvergne, J.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1681-1687.
50. Creatinine is an important analyte in medicinal diagnostics. The amount of excreted creatinine determines the globular filtration rate of a body. The value should be in a specific range for healthy humans, and it is used as a medical indicator. Determination of creatinine levels in medicinal diagnostics is performed by a photometric assay that requires three enzymes. The assay is highly selective and sensitive, but it is expensive due to the sensitivity of the enzymes to degredation.
51. For an approach to creatine recognition by MIPs, see: Subrahmanyam, S.; Piletsky, S. A.; Piletska, E. V.; Chen, B.; Day, R.; Turner, A. P. F. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 722-724.
52. Reichenbach-Klinke, R.; Koenig, B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2002, 2, 121-130.
53. Shionoya, M.; Kimura, E.; Shiro, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6730-6737.
54. If nitrogen atoms from other sources, e.g., the radical initiator, are incorporated into the polymer during preparation, the theoretical maximum number of binding sites would be smaller than calculated. The more important value of accessible binding sites was determined from binding isotherms.
55. The sensitivity of the metal complex monomer incorporation rate to the reaction conditions is illustrated with polymers 11-Zn-8-A and -B. By a slight increase of the amount of cross-linker (EDGMA + 13%) and the use of more solvent for polymerization, the rate of metal complex incorporation decreases from 50% (11-Zn-8-A) to 26% (11-Zn-8-B). The rate of incorporation seems to be concentration dependent, yielding higher rates of incorporation at higher concentrations, but the poor solubility of 6-Zn-7 does not allow increasing its concentration further. Another possible rationale for the observed incomplete incorporation may come from the metal complex monomer structure, which bears two flexible vinyl units. During polymerization an intramolecular reaction followed by radical transfer may happen, which will exclude the monomer from incorporation into the polymer matrix. Collman et al. recently described the copolymerization of vinyl Fe-porphyrins; see ref 9. While a porphyrin monomer with one polymerizable group was incorporated in more than 90%, a second monomer with three flexible vinyl groups was embedded into the polymer in only ∼60%. Functional monomers used for other MIP preparation have one polymerizable unit or two geometrically well-separated groups (see refs 3m, 3n, and 8).
56. This value exceeds reported numbers of accessible binding sites of respectively 20% 6 and 7-10%.7
57. (a) Umpleby, R. J.; Baxter, S. C.; Bode, M.; Berch, J. K.; Shah, R. N.; Shimizu, K. D. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 435, 35-42.
58. (b) Kim, H.; Spivak, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11269-11275.
59. Atkins, P. W. Physikalische Chemie, 2nd ed.; VCH-Wiley: New York, 1990; pp 797-801.
60. An additional argument for this hypothesis comes from the fit of the binding isotherm to a one set of sites model, which fails to describe MIP in many cases.
61. Binding of creatinine to polymer 11-Zn is very weak. Therefore, the ratio of binding affinities which is derived from polymer binding experiments must have a much larger error than the ratio derived from two solution studies.