Invasive angiography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance for coronary imaging and cardiovascular risk stratification?: Regulatory and pratical considerations;Quelle méthode d'angiographie pour prédire le risque coronaire en 2003? Aspects réglementaires et pratiques de l'utilisation de la coronarographie, de l'IRM et de l'angioscanner

Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angeiologie

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 79-90

  Philippe, F ^a  

^a INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

Author keywords

Angio IRM; Angioscanner; Cardiovascular risk stratification; Computed tomography; Coronarographie; Coronary angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Plaque; Pr diction du risque cardiovasculaire

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; BREATHING; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVASCULARIZATION; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 1642338880     PISSN: 00033928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ancard.2003.11.006     Document Type: Short Survey

References (58)

1. Yusuf S., Zucker D., Peduzzi P., et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet. 344:1994;563-570.
2. Waters D., Craven T.E., Lesperance J. Prognostic significance of progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 87:1993;1067-1075.
3. Mulcahy D., Husain S., Zalos G., et al. Ischemia during ambulatory monitoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Jama. 277:1997;318-324.
4. Devlin G., Lazzam L., Schwartz L. Mortality related to diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The importance of left main artery disease and catheter induced trauma. Int J Cardio Imaging. 13:1997;379-841.
5. Fayad Z.A., Fuster V., Nikolaou K., Becker C. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive coronary angiography and plaque imaging: current and potential future concepts. Circulation. 106:2002;2026-2034.
6. Allman K.C., Shaw L.J., Hachamovitch R., Udelson J.E. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 39:2002;1151-1158.
7. Serruys P.W., Unger F., Sousa J.E., et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med. 344:2001;1117-1124.
8. Pitt B., Waters D., Brown W.V., van Boven A.J., et al. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin vs Revascularization Treatment Investigators. N Engl J Med. 341:1999;70-76.
9. LaRosa J.C., He J., Vupputuri S. Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Jama. 282:1999;2340-2346.
10. Serruys P.W., de Feyter P., Macaya C., et al. Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac vents following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 287:2002;3215-3222.
11. Yusuf S., Zhao F., Mehta S.R., Chrolavicius S., Tognoni G., Fox K.K. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 345:2001;494-502.
12. Mehta S.R., Yusuf S., Peters R.J., et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet. 358:2001;527-533.
13. Steinhubl S.R., Berger P.B., Mann J.T. 3rd, Fry E.T., DeLago A., Wilmer C., et al. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 288:2002;2411-2420.
14. Libby P. Current concepts of the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 104:2001;365-372.
15. Rioufol G., Finet G., Ginon I., et al. Multiple atherosclerotic plaque rupture in acute coronary syndrome: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 106:2002;804-808.
16. Buffon A., Biasucci L.M., Liuzzo G., D'Onofrio G., Crea F., Maseri A. Widespread coronary inflammation in unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 347:2002;5-12.
17. Meyer P., Barragan P., Blanchard D., et al. Recommandations de la Société française de cardiologie concernant la formation des médecins coronarographistes et angioplasticiens, l'organisation et l'équipement des centres de coronarographie et d'angioplastie coronaire. Arch Mal Coeur. 93:2001;147-158.
18. Hirshfeld J.W., Banas J.S., Brundage B.H., et al. American College of Cardiology training statement on recommendations for the structure of an optimal adult interventional cardiology training program: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 34:1999;2141-2147.
19. ACC/AHA Guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol. 37:2001;2239i-2241xvi.
20. Informations des patients avant une coronarographie et une angioplastie coronaire. Arch Mal Coeur. 92:1999;75-78.
21. Desmet W., Willems J., Van Lierde J., Pisessens J. Discrepancy between visual estimation and computer-assisted measurement of lesion severity before and after coronary angioplasty. Cath cardiovasc Diagn. 28:1993;1-6.
22. Danchin N., Jullière Y., Foley D., Serruys P.W. Visual verus quantitative assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenosis: can the angiographer'eye be reeducated? Am Heart J. 126:1993;594-600.
23. Reiber J.H.C., Kooijman C.J., Gerbrands J.J., Schuurbiers C.C.H., den Boer A. Coronary artery dimensions from cineangiograms: methodology and validation of a computer-assisted analysis procedure. IEEE Trans med Imag. MI-3:1984;131-140.
24. Ledru F., Theroux P., Lesperance J., et al. Geometric features of coronary artery lesions favoring acute occlusion and myocardial infarction: a quantitative angiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 33:1999;1353-1361.
25. Nakanishi T., Ito K., Imazu M., et al. Evaluation of coronary artery stenoses using electronbeam CT and multiplanar reformation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 21:1997;121-127.
26. Achenbach S., Ropers D., Regenfus M., et al. Contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography to analyse the coronary arteries in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 84:2000;489-493.
27. Schmermund A., Rensing B.J., Sheedy P.F., et al. Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 31:1998;1547-1554.
28. Reddy G.P., Chernoff D.M., Adams J.R., et al. Coronary artery stenoses: assessment with contrast-enhanced electron- beam CT and axial reconstructions. Radiology. 208:1998;167-172.
29. Budoff M.J., Oudiz R.J., Zalace C.P., et al. Intravenous three-dimensional coronary angiography using contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 83:1999;840-845.
30. Achenbach S., Moshage W., Ropers D., et al. Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N Engl J Med. 339:1998;1964-1971.
31. Niemann K., Oudkerk M., Rensing B.J., et al. Coronary Angiography with Multi-Slice Computed Tomography. Lancet. 357:2001;599-603.
32. Achenbach S., Giesler T., Ropers D., et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation. 103:2001;2535-2538.
33. Knez A., Becker C.R., Leber A., et al. Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol. 88:2001;1191-1194.
34. Vogl T.J., Abolmaali N.D., Diebold T., et al. Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology. 223:2002;212-220.
35. Nieman K., Cademartiri F., Lemos P.A., Raaijmakers R., Pattynama P.M.T., de Feyter P.J. Reliable Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Fast Submillimeter Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography. Circulation. 106:2002;2051-2054.
36. Manning W.J., Li W., Edelman R.R. A preliminary report comparing magnetic resonance coronary angiography with conventional angiography. N Engl J Med. 328:1993;828-832.
37. Post J.C., van Rossum A.C., Hofman M.B.M., et al. Clinical utility of two-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in detecting coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 18:1997;426-433.
38. Post J.C., van Rossum A.C., Hofman M.B.M., et al. Three-dimensional respiratory-gated MR angiography of coronary arteries: comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 166:1996;1399-1404.
39. Müller M.F., Fleisch M., Kroeker R., et al. Proximal coronary artery stenosis: three-dimensional MRI with fat saturation and navigator echo. J Magn Reson Imaging. 7:1997;644-651.
40. Kessler W., Achenbach S., Moshage W., et al. Usefulness of respiratory gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography in assessing narrowings ≥50% in diameter in native coronary arteries and in aortocoronary bypass conduits. Am J Cardiol. 80:1997;989-993.
41. van Geuns R.J., de Bruin H.G., Rensing B.J., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary arteries: clinical results from three dimensional evaluation of a respiratory gated technique. Heart. 82:1999;515-519.
42. Sandstede J.J., Pabst T., Beer M., et al. Three-dimensional MR coronary angiography using the navigator technique compared with conventional coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 172:1999;135-139.
43. Huber A., Nikolaou K., Gonschior P., et al. Navigator echo-based respiratory gating for three-dimensional MR coronary angiography: results from healthy volunteers and patients with proximal coronary artery stenoses. Am J Roentgenol. 173:1999;95-101.
44. Sardanelli F., Molinari G., Zandrino F., et al. Three-dimensional, navigator-echo MR coronary angiography in detecting stenoses of the major epicardial vessels, with conventional coronary angiography as the standard of reference. Radiology. 214:2000;808-814.
45. Gonschior P., Pragst I., Valassis G., et al. High-resolution MR angiography: results in diseased arteries. J Invasive Cardiol. 13:2001;151-157.
46. Nikolaou K., Huber A., Knez A., et al. Navigator echo-based respiratory gating for 3D-MR coronary angiography: Reduction of scan time using a slice-interpolation technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 25:2001;378-387.
47. Lethimonnier F., Furber A., Morel O., et al. Three-dimensional coronary artery MR imaging using prospective real-time respiratory navigator and linear phase shift processing: comparison with conventional coronary angiography. Magn Reson Imaging. 17:1999;1111-1120.
48. Kim W.Y., Danias P.G., Stuber M., et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenosis. N Engl J Med. 345:2001;1863-1869.
49. van Geuns R.J., Wielopolski P.A., de Bruin H.G., et al. MR coronary angiography with breath-hold targeted volumes: preliminary clinical results. Radiology. 217:2000;270-277.
50. Regenfus M., Ropers D., Achenbach S., et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 36:2000;44-50.
51. Duerinckx A. Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography. 2002;Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
52. Nikolaou K., Becker C.R., Muders M., et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance and multi-slice CT imaging of coronary artery plaques in human ex vivo coronary arteries. Radiology. 221:2001;503.
53. Fayad Z.A., Fuster V., Fallon J.T., et al. Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 102:2000;506-510.
54. Worthley S.G., Helft G., Fuster V., et al. Noninvasive in vivo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental coronary artery lesions in a porcine model. Circulation. 101:2000;2956-2961.
55. Botnar R.M., Kim W.Y., Bornert P., et al. 3D coronary vessel wall imaging utilizing a local inversion technique with spiral image acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 46:2001;848-854.
56. Helft G., Worthley S.G., Fuster V., et al. Progression and regression of atherosclerotic lesions: monitoring with serial noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 105:2002;993-998.
57. Corti R., Fayad Z.A., Fuster V., et al. Effects of lipid-lowering by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a longitudinal study by high-resolution, noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 104:2001;249-252.
58. Blankenship J., Iliadis L. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med. 346:2002;1413-1414.