French cardiac society's recommendations, about angioplastic and coronarographic surgeons' professional training: Organization and equipment of coronarography and coronary angioplasty centers;Recommendations de la societe Francaise de cardiologie concernant la formation des medecins coronarographistes et angioplasticiens, l'organisation et l'equipement des centres de coronarographie et d'angioplastie coronaire

Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux

Volumn 93, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 147-158

  Meyer, P ^a   Barragan, P ^a   Blanchard, D ^a   Chevalier, B ^a   Commeau, P ^a   Danchin, N ^a   Fajadet, J ^a   Grand, A ^a   Lablanche, J M ^a   Machecourt, J ^a   Metzger, J P ^a   Monassier, J P ^a   Neimann, J L ^a   Puel, J ^a   Steg, P G ^a  

^a Societe Francaise de Cardiologie   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIOLOGY; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; FRANCE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; ORGANIZATION; REVIEW; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TRAINING; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; STANDARD;

ANGIOPLASTY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FRANCE; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 0033956468     PISSN: 00039683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Monassier JP, Bertrand M, Cherrier F et al. Recommandations de la Société française de cardiologie concernant la formation des médecins coronarographistes et angioplasticiens, l'organisation et l'équipement des centres de coronarographie et d'angioplastie coronaire. Arch Mal Cœur 1991 ; 84 : 1783-7.
2. Morice MC, Bertrand M, Cherrier F et al. Recommandations de la Société française de cardiologie concernant la formation des médecins coronarographistes et angioplasticiens, l'organisation et l'équipement des centres de coronarographie et d'angioplastie coronaire. Arch Mal Cœur 1996 ; 89 : 747-53.
3. Jollis JG, Peterson ED, De Long ER et al. The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. N Engl J Med 1994 ; 331 : 1625-9.
4. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Laskey WK. The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications. JAMA 1995 ; 274 : 1137-42.
5. Hannan EL, Racz M, Ryan TJ et al. Coronary anqioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA 1997; 277: 892-8.
6. Jollis JG, Peterson ED, Nelson CL et al. Relationship between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome in elderly patients. Circulation 1997 ; 95 : 2485-91.
7. Ellis SG, Weintraub W, Holmes D et al. Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. Circulation 1997 ; 95 : 2479-84.
8. Klein LW, Schaer GL, Calvin JE et al. Does low individual operator coronary interventional procedural volume correlate with worse institutional procedural outcome? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 ; 30 : 870-7.
9. Shook TL, Sun GW, Burstein S et al. Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcome and hospital costs for low-volume and high-volume operators. Am J Cardiol 1996 ; 77 : 331-6.
10. McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Malenka DJ et al. Operator volume and outcomes in 12,998 percutaneous coronary interventions. Northern New Enqland Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 ; 31 : 570-6.
11. Malenka DJ, Mc Grath PD, Wennberg DE et al. The relationship between operator volume and outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in high volume hospitals in 1994-1996. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 ; 34 : 1471-80.
12. Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Schomig A. Operator volume and outcome of patients undergoing coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 ; 32 : 970-6.
13. Kimmel SE, Kolansky DM. Operator volume as a "risk factor". J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 ; 30 : 878-80.
14. Teirstein PS. Credentialing for coronary interventions. Practice makes perfect. Circulation 1997 ; 95 : 2467-70.
15. Hannan EL. Percutaneous coronary interventions: heed the American College of Cardiology volume recommandations, but strive to improve quality. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 ; 34 : 1481-3.
16. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary angioplasty: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (Subcommitee on Percuataneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol 1988 ; 12 : 529-45.
17. Douglas JS Jr, Levin DC, Pepine CJ et al. Recommendations for development and maintenance of competence in coronary interventional procedures. American College of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993 ; 22 : 629-31.
18. Hirshfeld J Jr, Ellis SG, Faxon DP. Recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures. Statement of the Americain College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 ; 31 : 722-43.
19. Parker DJ, Gray HH, Balcon R et al. Planning for coronary angioplasty: guidelines for training and continuing competence. British Cardiac Society and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society working group on interventional cardiology. Heart 1996 ; 75 : 419-25.
20. Recommandations de la Société française de cardiologie pour la prise en charge des urgences cardiologiques. Arch Mal Cœur 1999 ; 92 : 337-45.
21. Ryan TJ. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 ; 34 : 890-911.
22. Meyer J, Merx W, Schmitz H et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty after intracoronary streptokinase in evolving acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1982 ; 66 : 905-13.
23. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986 ; 1 : 397-402.
24. Franzosi MG, Santoro E, De Vita C et al. Ten-years follow-up of the first megatrial testing thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto study. Circulation 1998 ; 98 : 2659-65.
25. ISIS-2 (Second International Study Group or Infarct Survival) collaborative study group. Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1988 ; 2 : 349-60.
26. The Gusto angiographic investigators. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase or both on coronary artery patency, ventricular function and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Enql J Med 1993 ; 329 : 1615-22
27. Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J et al. A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993 ; 328 : 673-9.
28. Zijlstra F, Menko J de B, Hoorntje JCA et al. A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993 ; 328 : 680-4
29. Ribichini F, Steffenino G, Dellavalle A et al. Comparison of thrombolytic therapy and primary coronary anqioplasty with liberal stentinq for inferior myocardial infarction with precordial ST-segment depression. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32 : 1687-94.
30. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA 1997 ; 278 : 2093-8.
31. The global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in acute coronary syndromes (GUSTO-IIb). Angioplasty substudy investigators. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1997 ; 336 : 1621-8.
32. Danchin N, Vaur L, Genès N et al. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by primary coronary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in the "real world": one-year results from a nationwide french survey. Circulation 1999 ; 99 : 2639-44.
33. Every NR, Parsons LS, Hiatky M et al. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1996 ; 335 : 1253-60.
34. Tiefenbrunn AJ, Chandra NC, French WJ et al. Clinical experience with primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminoqen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 ; 31 : 1240-5.
35. Antoniucci D, Santoro GM, Bolognese L et al. A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the FRESCO trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 ; 31 : 1234-9.
36. O'Keefe JH, Bailey WL, Rutherford BD, Hartzler O. Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in 1000 consecutive patients. Results in an unselected population and hiqh-risk subgroups. Am J Cardiol 1993 ; 72 : 107-15.
37. O'Neill W. Angioplasty Therapy for Cardioqenic Shock: are randomized trials necessary? J Am Coll Cardiol 1992 ; 19 : 915-7.
38. Lee L, Bates ER , Walton JA et al. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty improves survival in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1998 ; 78 : 1345-51.
39. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro GM et al. Systematic direct angioplasty and stent-supported direct angioplasty therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998 ; 31 : 294-300.
40. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999 ; 341 : 625-34.
41. Christian TF, O'Keefe JH, De wood MA et al. Intercenter variability in outcome for patients treated with direct coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1998 ; 35 : 310-7.
42. Doorey A, Patel S, Reese C et al. Dangers of delay of initiation of either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty in ocute myocardial infarction with increasing use of primary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998 ; 81 : 1173-7.
43. Steg PG, Himbert D, Juliard JM. Plaidoyer pour une utilisation rationnelle des techniques de reperfusion à la phase aiguë de l'infarctus du myocarde. Arch Mal Cœur 1999 ; 92 : 697-9.
44. Task Force Report. The prehospital management of acute heart attacks. Recommendations of a Task Force of the European Resuscitation Council. Eur Heart J 1998 ; 19 : 1140-60.
45. EMIP FR (The European Myocardial Infarction Project Group). Prehospital thrombolytic therapy in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993 ; 329 : 383-9.
46. Touboul P, Bonnefoy E. Comparaison de l'angioplastie primaire et de la thrombolyse préhospitalière à la phase aiguë de l'infarctus du myocarde. Arch Mal Cœur 1998 ; 91 : 33-8.
47. Ellis SG, do Silva ER, Heyndrickx G et al. Randomized comparison of rescue angioplasty with conservative management of patients with early failure of thrombolysis for acute anterior myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994 ; 90 : 2280-4.