Engineering grapevine for increased resistance to fungal pathogens without compromising wine stability

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 168-173

  Ferreira, Ricardo B ^a,b   Monteiro, Sara S ^a,b   Piçarra Pereira, M Antonieta ^b,c   Teixeira, Artur R ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE TECNOLOGIA QUÍMICA E BIOLÓGICA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^c INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE CASTELO BRANCO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRUITS; FUNGI; FUNGUS ATTACK; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

FUNGAL PATHOGENS; GRAPEVINES;

WINE;

PROTEIN;

CROP IMPROVEMENT; DISEASE RESISTANCE; FUNGAL DISEASE; PROTEIN; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

FUNGAL VIRULENCE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENETICS; GRAPE; GROWING SEASON; NONHUMAN; PH; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PURIFICATION; REVIEW; STRESS; VINICULTURE; WINE INDUSTRY;

FUNGI; VITIS; VITIS SP.; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 1642312243     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aigrain P. Conjoncture vitivinicole mondiale. Bull. OIV. 817-818:1999;228-240.
2. Galet P. The diseases and parasites of the grapevine. Galet P. Imprimerie du Paysan du Midi. 1977;871 Montpellier, France.
3. van Loon L.C. Occurrence and properties of plant pathogenesis-related proteins. Datta S.K., Muthukrishnan S. Pathogenesis-Related Proteins in Plants. 1999;1-19 CRC Press.
4. Odjakova M., Hadjiivanova C. The complexity of pathogen defence in plants. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 27:2001;101-109.
5. Kombrink E., Somssich I.E. Pathogenesis-related proteins and plant defense. Carrol G., Tudzynski P. The Mycota (Plant Relationships). 1997;107-128 Springer.
6. Tattersall D.B., et al. Pathogenesis related proteins - Their accumulation in grapes during berry growth and their involvement in white wine heat instability. Current knowledge and future perspectives in relation to winemaking practices. Roubelakis-Angelakis K.A. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology of the Grapevine. 2001;183-201 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
7. Tattersall D.B., et al. Identification and characterization of a fruit-specific, thaumatin-like protein that accumulates at very high levels in conjunction with the onset of sugar accumulation and berry softening in grapes. Plant Physiol. 114:1997;759-769.
8. Robinson S.P., Davies C. Molecular biology of grape berry ripening. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 6:2000;175-188.
9. Waters E.J., et al. Sequence analysis of grape (Vitis vinifera) berry chitinases that cause haze formation in wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:1998;3-5.
10. Jacobs A.K., et al. Powdery mildew infection and ethephon treatment induce different pathogenesis-related cDNAs in grapevine. Plant Pathol. 48:1999;325-336.
11. Monteiro S., et al. Environmental conditions during vegetative growth determine the major proteins that accumulate in mature grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:2003;4046-4053.
12. Ferreira R.B., et al. The wine proteins. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 12:2002;230-239.
13. Monteiro S., et al. The wide diversity of structurally similar wine proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:2001;3999-4010.
14. Ferreira R.B. Characterisation of the proteins from grapes and wines by immunological methods. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51:2000;22-28.
15. Waters E.J., et al. Nuisance proteins of wine are grape pathogenesis-related proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:1996;3-5.
16. Waters E.J., Hoj P. Grape proteins involved in white wine instability: a short review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Colloids and Mouthfeel in Wines. 1999;The Australian Wine Research Institute. pp. 41-49.
17. Pocock K.F., et al. Thaumatin-like proteins and chitinases, the haze forming proteins of wine, accumulate during ripening of grape (V. vinifera) berries and drought stress does not affect the final levels per berry at maturity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2000;1637-1643.
18. Colova-Tsolova V. A highly efficient Agrobacterium transformation system in grape embryogenic cell suspension enable co-transformation using simultaneously two Agrobacteria carrying different selectable markers. HortScience. 35:2000;393.
19. Vivier M.A., Pretorius I.S. Genetically tailored grapevines for the wine industry. Trends Biotechnol. 20:2002;472-478.
20. Yamamoto T., et al. Transgenic grapevine plants expressing a rice chitinase with enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens. Plant Cell Rep. 19:2000;639-646.
21. Kikkert J.R. Genetic engineering of grapevine (Vitis sp.) for enhancement of disease resistance. Acta Hortic. 447:1997;273-279.
22. Coutos-Thevenot P., et al. First approaches for improving through molecular way grapevine tolerance to fungus disease. Resumes, The VII Symposium International sur la Genetic et l'amellioration de la Vigne. C4.2:1998;. p. 103.
23. Kliewer M.W., et al. Relative effectiveness of leaf removal, shoot positioning, and trellising for improving wine grape composition. Smart R., et al. Proceedings of the Second International Cool Climate Viticulture and Oenology Symposium. 1988;123-126 Auckland, New Zealand.
24. Zahavi T., et al. Effect of grapevine training systems on development of powdery mildew. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107:2001;495-501.
25. Pocock K.F., Waters E.J. The effect of mechanical harvesting and transport of grapes, and juice oxidation, on the protein stability of wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 4:1998;136-139.
26. Oliva J., et al. Integrated control of grape berry moth (Lobesia botrana), powdery mildew (Uncinula necator), downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) and grapevine sour rot (Acetobacter spp.). Crop Prot. 18:1999;581-587.
27. Gadoury D., et al. Ontogenic resistance to powdery mildew in grape berries. Phytopathology. 93:2003;547-555.
28. Marchal R., et al. Effects of Botrytis cinerea infection on the must protein electrophoretic characteristics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:1998;4945-4949.
29. Francis L.L., et al. The sensory effects of pre- or post-fermentation thermal processing on Chardonnay and Semillon wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:1994;243-251.
30. Jeandet P., et al. Phytoalexins from the vitaceae: Biosynthesis, phytoalexin gene expression in transgenic plants, antifungal activity, and metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:2002;2731-2741.
31. Dai G., et al. Histochemical studies on the interaction between three species of grapevine, Vitis vinifera, V. rupestris and V. rotundifolia and the downy mildew fungus, Plasmopara viticola. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 46:1995;177-188.
32. Montero C., et al. trans-Resveratrol and grape disease resistance. A dynamical study by high-resolution laser-based techniques. Plant Physiol. 131:2003;129-138.
33. Coutos-Thévenot P., et al. In vitro tolerance to Botrytis cinerea of grapevine 41B rootstock in transgenic plants expressing the stilbene synthase Vst1 gene under the control of a pathogen-inducible PR 10 promoter. J. Exp. Bot. 52:2001;901-910.
34. Legrand V., et al. Constitutive expression of Vr-ERE gene in transformed grapevines confers enhanced resistance to eutypine, a toxin from Eutypa lata. Plant Sci. 164:2003;809-814.
35. Poinssot B., et al. The endopolygalacturonase 1 from Botrytis cinerea activated grapevine defense reactions unrelated to its enzymatic activity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Int. 16:2003;553-564.
36. Hallman J., et al. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can. J. Microbiol. 43:1997;895-914.
37. Benhamou N., Nicole M. Cell biology of plant immunization against microbiological infection: the potential of induced resistance in controlling plant diseases. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 37:1999;703-719.
38. Barka E.A., et al. Inhibitory effect of endophyte bacteria on Botrytis cinerea and its influence to promote the grapevine growth. Biological Control. 24:2002;135-142.
39. Renault A.S., et al. Pathogenesis-related proteins in grapevines induced by salicylic acid and Botrytis cinerea. Vitis. 35:1996;49-52.
40. Busam G., et al. Differential expression of chitinase in V. vinifera L. responding to systemic acquired resistance activators or fungal challenge. Plant Physiol. 115:1997;1029-1038.
41. Derckel J.P., et al. Characterization, induction by wounding and salicylic acid, and activity against Botrytis cinerea of chitinases and β-1,3-glucanases of ripening grape berries. Physiol. Plant. 104:1998;56-64.
42. Kraeva E., et al. Transcription of a beta-1,3-glucanase gene in grape berries in a late developmental period, or earlier after wounding treatments. Vitis. 37:1998;107-111.
43. Robinson S.P., et al. A class IV chitinase is highly expressed in grape berries during ripening. Plant Physiol. 114:1997;771-778.
44. Hayasaka Y., et al. Use of electrospray mass spectrometry for mass determination of grape (Vitis vinifera) juice pathogenesis-related proteins: A potential tool for varietal differentiation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:2001;1830-1839.
45. Salzman R.A., et al. Coordinate accumulation of antifungal proteins and hexoses constitutes a developmentally controlled defence response during fruit ripening in grape. Plant Physiol. 117:1998;465-472.
46. Hawksworth P.M., et al. Ainsworth and Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi. 8th edn:1996;CAB International.