A multiple-perspective analysis of learning in the presence of technology

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 35-59

  Forster, Patricia A ^a   Taylor, Peter C ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Mathematical development; Reflection; Reflexivity; Social constructivism

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642270992     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004053819533     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M.: 1994, 'Ethnography and participant observation', in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 248-261.
2. Ausubel, D.P.: 1968, Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, New York.
3. Bauersfeld, H.: 1995, 'The structuring of structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice', in L.P. Steffe and J. Gale (eds.), Constructivism in Education, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 137-158.
4. nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, South Africa. Vol 1, pp. 33-48.
5. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K. and Whitenack, J.: 1997, 'Reflective discourse and collective reflection', Journal of research into mathematics education 28(3), 258-277.
6. Cobb, P. and Bowers, J.: 1999, 'Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice', Educational Researcher 28(2), 4-15.
7. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K. and Whitenack, J.: 1997, 'Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of significance in one first-grade classroom', in D. Kirshner and J.A. Whitson (eds.), Situated Cognition: Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 151-234.
8. Cobb, P., Wood, T. and Yackel, E.: 1991, 'A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics', in E. von Glasersfeld (ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 157-176.
9. Cohen, L. and Manion, L.: 1994, Research Methods in Education (4th ed.), London.
10. rd ed.), New York, pp. 119-161.
11. Forster P.A. and Taylor, P.C.: 1999, 'Learning mathematics through conversation and utilizing technology', Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.
12. Gray E.M. and Tall, D.O.: 1994, 'Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: a proceptual view of simple arithmetic', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25(2), 116-140.
13. Groisman, A., Shapiro, B. and Willinsky, J.: 1991, 'The potential of semiotics to inform understanding of vents in science education', International Journal of Science Education 13, 217-226.
14. Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S.: 1989, Fourth Generation Evaluation, Newbury Park, CA.
15. Hiebert, J. and Carpenter, T.P.: 1992, 'Learning and teaching with understanding', in D.A. Grouws (ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning, New York, pp. 65-97.
16. Hollar, J.C. and Norwood, K.: 1999, 'The effects of a graphing-approach intermediate algebra curriculum on students' understanding of function', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 30(2), 220-226.
17. Kaput, J.J.: 1998, 'Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A klaidescope of windows', Journal of Mathematical Behavior 17(2), 265-281.
18. Lave, J. and Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge.
19. Noddings, N.: 1990, 'Constructivism in mathematics education', in R.B. Davis, C.A. Mayer and N. Noddings (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Reston, VA, pp. 7-29.
20. Noss, R. and Hoyles, C.: 1996, Windows on Mathematical Meanings, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
21. O'Callaghan, B.R.: 1998, 'Computer intensive algebra and students conceptual knowledge of functions', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29(1), 21-40.
22. Richardson, L.: 1994, 'Writing: A method of inquiry', in N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 516-529.
23. Roth, W.-M. and McGinn M.G.: 1998, 'Inscriptions: Towards a theory of representing as social practice', Review of Educational Research 68(1), 35-59.
24. Sadler, A.J.: 1993, Geometry and Trigonometry, Perth, Western Australia.
25. Salomon, G. and Perkins, D.N.: 1998, 'Individual and social aspects of learning', in P.D. Pearson and A. Iran-Nejad (eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 23), Washington, DC, pp. 1-70.
26. Salomon, G., Perkins, D.N. and Globerson, T.: 1991, 'Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies', Educational Researcher 20(3), 2-9.
27. Sfard, A.: 1991, 'On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin', Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 1-36.
28. Sfard, A. and Linchevski, L.: 1994, 'The gains and pitfalls of reification-the case of algebra', Educational Studies in Mathematics 26, 191-228.
29. Sfard, A., Nesher, P., Streefland, L., Cobb, P. and Mason, J.: 1998, 'Learning mathematics through conversation: Is it as good as they say? [1]', For the Learning of Mathematics 18(1), 41-51.
30. Smith, E. S.: 1999, 'Social constructivism, individual constructivism and the role of computers in mathematics educatipon', Journal of Mathematical Behavior 17(4), 411-425.
31. Taylor, P.C., Fraser, B.J. and Fisher, D.L.: 1997, 'Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments', International Journal of Educational Research 27(4), 293-302.
32. Tobin, K. and Tippins, D.: 1993, 'Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning', in K. Tobin (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3-21.
33. von Glaserfeld, E.: 1990, 'An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical', in R.B. Davis, C.A. Mayer and N. Noddings (eds.), Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 19-29.