Perception of phrase structure in music

Human Brain Mapping

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 259-273

  Knösche, Thomas R ^a   Neuhaus, Christiane ^b   Haueisen, Jens ^b   Alter, Kai ^a   Maess, Burkhard ^a   Witte, Otto W ^b   Friederici, Angela D ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; Magnetoencephalography; Music perception; Prosody

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CINGULATE GYRUS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LIMBIC SYSTEM; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MEMORY; MUSIC; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MUSIC;

EID: 16344378424     PISSN: 10659471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20088     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Beach CM (1991): The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: evidence for cue trading relations. J Memory Lang 30:644-663.
2. Besson M, Macar F (1987): An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and language. Psychophysiology 24:14-25
3. Besson M, Schön D (2003): Comparison between language and music. In: Peretz I, Zatorre R, editors. Cognitive neuroscience of music. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
4. Besson M, Faita F, Requin J (1994): Brain waves with musical incongruity differ for musicians and non-musicians. Neurosci Lett 168:101-105.
5. Binder JR, Zilbovicius M, Crozier S, Thivard L, Fontaine A, Masure M, Samson Y (1998): Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing. J Cogn Neurosci 10:536-540.
6. Brattico E, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M (2001): Context effects on pitch perception in musicians and non-musicians: evidence from event-related potential recordings. Music Percept 19:199-222.
7. Cabeza R, Nyberg L (2000): Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci 12:1-4.
8. Cazalis F, Valabregue R, Pelegrini-Isaac M, Asloun S, Robbins TW, Granon S (2003): Individual differences in prefrontal cortical activation on the Tower of London planning task: implication for effortful processing. Eur J Neurosci 17:2219-2225.
9. Chiappe P, Schmuckler MA (1997): Phrasing influences the recognition of melodies. Psychon B Rev 4:254-259.
10. Cooper WE, Paccia-Cooper J (1980): Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Cuddy LL, Cohen AJ, Mewhort DJK (1981): Perception of structure in short melodic sequences. J Exp Psychol Human 7:869-883.
12. Cutler A, Dahan D, van Donselaar W (1997): Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Lang Speech 40:141-201.
13. Dowling WJ (1973): Rhythmic groups and subjective chunks in memory for melodies. Percept Psychophys 14:37-40.
14. Drake C, Penel A, Bigand E (2000): Tapping in time with mechanically and expressively performed music. Music Percept 18:1-23.
15. Friederici AD, Pfeifer E, Hahne A (1993): Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cogn Brain Res 1:183-192.
16. Gaab N, Schlaug G (2003): The effect of musicianship on pitch memory in performance matched groups. Neuroreport 14:2291-2295
17. Griffith TD, Warren JD (2002): The planum temporale as computational hub. Trends Neurosci 25:348-353.
18. Hahne A, Friederici AD (1999): Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. J Cogn Neurosci 11:194-205.
19. Hämäläinen MS, Sarvas J (1987): Feasibility of the homogeneous head model in the interpretation of neuromagnetic data. Phys Med Biol 32:91-97.
20. Haueisen J, Knösche TR (2001): Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception. J Cogn Neurosci 13:786-792.
21. Hruska C, Alter K (2004): How prosody can influence sentence perception. In: Steube A, editor. Information structure: theoretical and empirical evidence. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
22. Jäncke L, Wusenberg T, Scheich H, Heinze H (2002): Phonetic perception and the temporal cortex. Neuroimage 15:733-746.
23. Janke W, Debus G (1978): Die Eigenschaftswörterliste EWL. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
24. Jongsma MLA, Desain P, Honing H (2004): Rhythmic context influences the auditory evoked potentials of musicians and nonmusicians. Biol Psychol 66:129-152.
25. Keller H (1955): Phrasierung und Artikulation: Ein Beitrag zu einer Sprachlehre der Musik. Kassel: Bärenreiter.
26. Knösche TR (2002): Transformation of whole-head MEG recordings between different sensor positions, Biomed Tech 47:59-62.
27. Knösche TR, Neuhaus C, Haueisen J, Alter K (2003): The role of the planum temporale in the perception of musical phrases. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging (NFSI), Chieti, Italy, September 2003.
28. Koelsch S, Schröger E, Tervaniemi M (1999): Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. Neuroreport 10:1309-1313.
29. Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Friederici AD, Schröger E (2000): Brain indices of music processing: non-musicians are musical. J Cogn Neurosci 12:520-541.
30. Koelsch S, Gunter TC, von Cramon DY, Zysset S, Lohmann G, Friederici AD (2002): Bach speaks: a cortical 'language-network' serves the processing of music. Neuroimage 17:956-966.
31. Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Schröger E, Friederici AD (2003): Processing tonal modulations-an ERP study. J Cogn Neurosci 15:1149-1159.
32. Lerdahl F, Jackendoff R (1983): A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge: MIT Press.
33. Liegeois-Chauvel C, Peretz I, Babai M, Laguitton V, Chauvel P (1998): Contribution of different cortical areas in the temporal lobes to music processing. Brain 121:1853-1867.
34. Maess B, Koelsch S, Gunter TC, Friederici AD (2001): Musical syntax in processed in Broca's area: and MEG study. Nat Neurosci 4:540-545.
35. Marcus M, Hindle D (1990): Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. In: Altmann GTM, editor. Cognitive models of speech processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p 483-512.
36. Marslen-Wilson WD, Tyler LK, Warren P, Grenier P, Lee CS (1992): Prosodie effects in minimal attachment. Q J Exp Psychol 45A: 73-87.
37. Mattheson J (1976): Kern melodischer Wissenschaft [reprint of Hamburg edition of 1737]. Hildesheim: Olms
38. Menon V, Levitin DJ, Smith BK, Lembke A, Krasnow BD, Glazer D, Glover GH, McAdams S (2002): Neural correlates of timbre change in harmonic sounds. Neuroimage 17:1742-1754.
39. Meyer M, Steinhauer K, Alter K, Friederici AD, von Cramon DY (2004): Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody. Brain Lang 89:277-289.
40. Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM (1992): Multiple dipole modelling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:541-557.
41. Ohnishi T, Matsuda H, Asada T, Aruga M, Hirakata M, Nishikawa M, Katoh A, Imabayashi E (2001): Functional anatomy of musical perception in musicians. Cereb Cortex 11:754-760.
42. Oldfield RC (1971): The assessment and analysis of handedness. Neuropsychologia 9:97-113.
43. Oostenveld R, Praamstra P (2001): The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol 112:713-719.
44. Overman AA, Hoge J, Dale JA, Cross JD, Chien A (2003): EEG alpha desynchronization in musicians and nonmusicians in response to changes in melody, tempo, and key in classical music. Percept Motor Skills 97:519-532.
45. Pannekamp A, Toepel U, Alter K, Hahne A, Friederici AD (2004): Prosody driven sentence processing: an ERP study. J Cogn Neurosci (in press).
46. Pantev C, Roberts LE, Schulz M, Engelien A, Ross B (2001): Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians. Neuroreport 12:169-174.
47. Pantev C, Ross B, Fujioka T, Trainor LJ, Schulte M, Schulz M (2003): Music and learning-induced cortical plasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 999:438-450.
48. Patel AD (2003): Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nat Neurosci 6:674-681.
49. Patel AD, Balaban E (2000): Temporal patterns of human cortical activity reflect tone sequence structure. Nature 404:80-84.
50. Patel AD, Balaban E (2001): Human pitch perception is reflected in the timing of stimulus-related cortical activity. Nat Neurosci 4:839-844.
51. Patel AD, Gibson E, Ramer J, Besson M, Holcomb P (1998): Processing syntactic relations in language and music: an event-related potential study. J Cogn Neurosci 10:717-733.
52. Paulus W (1988): Effect of musical modelling on late auditory evoked potentials. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci 237:307-311.
53. Phan KL, Wagner T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I (2002): Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 16:331-348.
54. Reber OJ, Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (2003): Dissociating explicit and implicit category knowledge with fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 15:574-583.
55. Riemann H (1900): Vademecum der Phrasierung. Leipzig: Max-Hesse-Verlag.
56. Ruff CC, Knauff M, Fangmeier T, Spreer J (2003): Reasoning and working memory: common and distinct neuronal processes. Neuropsychologia 41:1241-1252.
57. Schmithorst VJ, Holland SK (2003): The effect of musical training on musical processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Neurosci Lett 348:65-68.
58. Schulz M, Ross B, Pantev C (2003): Evidence for training-induced crossmodal reorganization of cortical functions in trumpet players. Neuroreport 14:157-161.
59. Selkirk E (1994): Sentence prosody: intonation, stress, and phrasing. In: Goldsmith J, editor. Handbook of phonological theory. New York: Blackwell. p 550-569.
60. Selkirk E (2000): The interaction of constraints on prosodie phrasing. In: Home M, editor. Prosody: theory and experiment. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
61. Steinhauer K (2003): Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation. Brain Lang 89:277-289.
62. Steinhauer K, Friederici AD (2001): Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. J Psycholinguist Res 30:267-295.
63. Steinhauer K, Alter K, Friederici AD (1999): Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nat Neurosci 2:191-196.
64. Stirling L, Wales R (1996): Does prosody support or direct sentence processing? Lang Cogn Process 11:193-212.
65. Stoffer TH (1985): Representation of phrase structure in the perception of music. Music Percept 3:191-220.
66. Streeter LA (1978): Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1582-1592.
67. Tan N, Aiello R, Bever TG (1981): Harmonic structure as a determinant of melodic organization. Mem Cognit 9:533-539.
68. Toepel U, Alter K (2003): How mis-specified accents can distress our brain. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain, August 2003, p 619-622.
69. Warren P, Grabe E, Nolan F (1995): Prosody, phonology, and parsing in closure ambiguities. Lang Cogn Process 10:457-486.
70. Werheid K, Zysset S, Muller A, Reuter M, von Cramon DY (2003): Rule learning in a serial reaction time task: an fMRI study on patients with early Parkinson's disease. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16:273-284.
71. Wilson SJ, Pressing J, Wales RJ, Pattinson P (1999): Cognitive models of music psychology and the lateralization of musical function within the brain. Aust J Psychol 51:125-139.
72. van Zuijen TL, Sussman E, Winkler I, Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M (2004): Grouping of sequential sounds-an event-related potential study comparing musicians and non-musicians. J Cogn Neurosci 16:331-338.
73. von Zerrsen D (1976): Klinische Selbstbeurteilungsskalen. Allgemeiner Teil. Weinheim: Beltz.