Music and Learning-Induced Cortical Plasticity

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 999, Issue , 2003, Pages 438-450

  Pantev, Christo ^a,d   Ross, Bernhard ^a   Fujioka, Takako ^a   Trainor, Laurel J ^b   Schulte, Michael ^a,c   Schulz, Matthias ^a  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cortical plasticity; Functional mismatch negativity (MMNm); MEG; Music

Indexed keywords

AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY MODULATION; GAMMA RHYTHM; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; LEARNING; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MUSIC; MUSICIAN; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PITCH; PROCESS MODEL; TRAINING;

PSOPHIIDAE;

EID: 0347569198     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1284.054     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. MERZENICH, M.M. & W.M. JENKINS. 1993. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J. Hand Ther. 6: 89-104.
2. MERZENICH, M. et al. 1996. Cortical plasticity underlying perceptual, motor, and cognitive skill development: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp Quant Biol. 61: 1-8.
3. ELBERT, T. & S. HEIM. 2001. A light and a dark side. Nature 411: 139.
4. PANTEV, C. et al. 1998. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 392: 811-814.
5. PANTEV, C. et al. 2001. Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians. Neuroreport 12: 169-174.
6. SCHULTE, M. et al. 2003. Functional evidence of different modes of pitch perception and learning induced plasticity in the human auditory cortex. Cortical Plasticity. In press.
7. TERHARDT, E. 1974. Pitch, consonance, and harmony. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55: 1061-1069.
8. SINGER, W. & C.M. GRAY. 1995. Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18: 555-586.
9. TALLON-BAUDRY, C. & O. BERTRAND. 1999. Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cognit. Sci. 3: 151-162.
10. SADATO, N. & M. HALLETT. 1999. fMRI occipital activation by tactile stimulation in a blind man. Neurology 52: 423.
11. FINNEY, E.M., I. FINE & K.R. DOBKINS. 2001. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nat. Neurosci. 4: 1171-1173.
12. MEREDITH, M.A. & B.E. STEIN. 1983. Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. Science 221: 389-391.
13. MEREDITH, M.A., M.T. WALLACE & B.E. STEIN. 1992. Visual, auditory and somatosensory convergence in output neurons of the cat superior colliculus: multisensory properties of the tecto-reticulo-spinal projection. Exp. Brain Res. 88: 181-186.
14. WALLACE, M.T., M.A. MEREDITH & B.E. STEIN. 1993. Converging influences from visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices onto output neurons of the superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 69: 1797-1809.
15. SCHULZ, M., B. ROSS & C. PANTEV. 2003. Evidence for training-induced crossmodal reorganization of cortical functions in trumpet players. Neuroreport 14: 157-161.
16. EFRON, R. 1993. Scientific misconduct: undue process. Account Res. 3: 223-238.
17. DEUTSCH, D. 1999. The Psychology of Music, 2nd Ed. Academic Press. San Diego.
18. DOWLING, W.J. 1978. Dichotic recognition of musical canons: effects of leading ear and time lag between ears. Percept. Psychophys. 23: 321-325.
19. DOWLING, W.J. 1982. Contour in Context: Comments on Edworthy. Psychomusicology 2: 47.
20. BARTLETT, J.C. & W.J. DOWLING. 1980. Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 6: 501-515.
21. TREHUB, S.E., L.J. TRAINOR & A.M. UNYK. 1993. Music and speech processing in the first year of life. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 24: 1-35.
22. PERETZ, I. & M. BABAI. 1992. The role of contour and intervals in the recognition of melody parts: evidence from cerebral asymmetries in musicians. Neuropsychologia 30: 277-292.
23. TRAINOR, L.J. 1999. A comparison of contour and interval processing in musicians and nonmusicians using event-related potentials. Australian J. Psychol. 51: 147-153.
24. TESCHE, C.D. et al. 1995. Signal-space projections of MEG data characterize both distributed and well-localized neuronal sources. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95: 189-200.
25. DAVISON, A.C. & D.V. HINKLEY. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, NY.