Carbon budget of Pinus sylvestris saplings after four years of exposure to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration

Tree Physiology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 325-337

  Janssens, Ivan A ^a   Medlyn, Belinda ^b   Gielen, Birgit ^a   Laureysens, Ilse ^a   Jack, M Ewa ^a   Van Hove, Ditske ^a   Ceulemans, Reinhart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Allocation; Construction respiration; MAESTRA; Maintenance respiration; Photosynthesis; Productivity

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; CARBON BUDGET; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; GROWTH RATE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SAPLING;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 16244408348     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.3.325     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bryant, J.P., F.S.I. Chapin and D.R. Klein. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357-368.
2. 2 in open top chambers increases net nitrification and potential denitrification. Global Change Biol. 8:590-598.
3. 2 on woody plants. Tansley Review No. 71. New Phytol. 127:425-446.
4. 2 alters wood production, wood quality and wood strength of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) after three years of enrichment. Global Change Biol. 8:153-162.
5. 2 concentration (FACE) in aging needles in a mature Pinus taeda forest. Tree Physiol. 24:961-970.
6. Curtis, P.S. 1996. A meta-analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 19:127-137.
7. 2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113:299-313.
8. 3 species. Planta 149:78-90.
9. 2 on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and needle nitrogen concentration in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Photosynthetica 38:13-21.
10. 2 enrichment (POPFACE) only slightly affect profiles of light and leaf characteristics in closed canopies of Populus. Global Change Biol. 9:1022-1037.
11. 2 partial pressure in field-grown Pinus radiata D. Don after 4 years. Plant Cell Environ. 23:1089-1098.
12. 2: a broader perspective. Photosynth. Res. 39:369-388.
13. 2. Acta Oecol. 18:319-325.
14. 2: a model for future forest responses?. Global Change Biol. 3:463-471.
15. Jach, M.E. 2000. Response of young Scots pine trees (Pinus sylvestris L.) to increased carbon dioxide concentration. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Antwerpen, Belgium, 49 p.
16. 2 on physiology and needle morphology of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings. In Impacts of Global Change on Tree Physiology and Forest Ecosystems. Eds. G.M.J. Mohren, K. Kramer and S. Sabaté. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 57-73.
17. 2 on phenology, growth and crown structure of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings after two years of exposure in the field. Tree Physiol. 19:289-300.
18. 2 on photosynthesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Tree Physiol. 20:145-157.
19. 2 on night-time respiration of needles of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Photosynthetica 38:57-67.
20. 2. Ann. Bot. 85:789-798.
21. 2 efflux in young Scots pine seedlings. Global Change Biol. 4:871-878.
22. Janssens, I.A., M. Mousseau and R. Ceulemans. 2000. Crop ecosystem responses to climatic change: Tree crops. In Climate Change and Global Crop Productivity. Eds. K.R. Reddy and H.F. Hodges. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K., pp 245-270.
23. 2 and temperature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 380 p.
24. 3 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 18:339-355.
25. 2 and temperature. New Phytol. 162:355-364.
26. 2 concentrations. Biogeochemistry 50:73-93.
27. 2. New Phytol. 150:665-674.
28. Medlyn, B.E. 2004. A MAESTRO retrospective. In Forests at the Land-Atmosphere Interface. Eds. M. Mencuccini, J. Moncrief, K. McNaughton and J. Grace. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, U.K., pp 105-121.
29. 2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant Cell Environ. 22:1475-1495.
30. 2 concentrations. In The Impact of Carbon Dioxide and Other Greenhouse Gases on Forest Ecosystems. Eds. D.F. Karnosky, G. Scarascia-Mugnozza, R. Ceulemans and J. Innes. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, U.K., pp 127-146.
31. Neirynck, J., P. Roskams and N. Lust. 1999. Results of 6 years monitoring of the chemical composition of precipitation and soil solution in the level II plot of Brasschaat. Meded. Inst. Bosbouw Wildbeheer 1:59-76.
32. Norby, R.J. 1996. Forest canopy productivity index. Nature 381:564.
33. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ. 22:683-714.
34. 2-enriched sweetgum stand. New Phytol. 150:477-488.
35. Oker-Blom, P. and S. Kellomäki. 1983. Effect of grouping of foliage on the within-stand and within-crown light regime: comparison of random and grouping canopy models. Agric. Meteorol. 28:143-155.
36. 2-enriched atmosphere. Nature 411:469-472.
37. Peltola, H., A. Kilpelainen and S. Kellomaki. 2002. Diameter growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) trees grown at elevated temperature and carbon dioxide concentration under boreal conditions. Tree Physiol. 22:963-972.
38. Persson, H. 1980. Spatial distribution of fine root growth, mortality and decomposition in a young Scots pine stand in Central Sweden. Oikos 34:77-87.
39. 2 (FACE). Plant Cell Environ. 25:851-858.
40. 2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Environ. Pollut. 83:155-189.
41. Ryan, M.G., R.M. Hubbard, S. Pongracic, R.J. Raison and R.E. McMurtrie. 1996. Foliage, fine-root, woody-tissue and stand respiration in Pinus radiata in relation to nitrogen status. Tree Physiol. 16:333-343.
42. 2 atmosphere alters carbon assimilation and allocation in a pine forest ecosystem. Global Change Biol. 9:1378-1400.
43. Stanners, D. and P. Bourdeau. 1995. Europe's environment: the Dobris assessment. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, 676 p.
44. 2. Tree Physiol. 19:221-228.
45. Tissue, D.T., K.L. Griffin, M.H. Turnbull and D. Whitehead. 2001. Canopy position and needle age affect photosynthetic response in field-grown Pinus radiata after five years of exposure to elevated carbon dioxide partial pressure. Tree Physiol. 21:915-923.
46. 2 een jaar na dunning. Licentiaatsthesis. Universiteit Antwerpen, pp 35.
47. Wang, Y.P. and P.G. Jarvis. 1990a. Effect of incident beam and diffuse radiation on PAR absorption, photosynthesis and transpiration of Sitka spruce - a simulation study. Silva Carel. 15:167-180.
48. Wang, Y.P. and P.G. Jarvis. 1990b. Influence of crown structural properties on PAR absorption, photosynthesis, and transpiration in Sitka spruce: application of a model (MAESTRO). Tree Physiol. 7:297-316.
49. 2 concentrations. Global Change Biol. 4:797-807.
50. Wullschleger, S.D., R.J. Norby and C.A. Gunderson. 1992. Growth and maintenance respiration in expanding leaves of Liriodendron tulipifera L. saplings exposed to long-term carbon dioxide enrichment under field conditions. New Phytol. 121:515-523.
51. 2 fertilization effect in forests: estimates of the biotic growth factor based on 58 controlled-exposure studies. In Biotic Feedbacks in the Global Climatic System: Will the Warming Feed the Warming? Eds. G.M. Woodwell and F.T. MacKenzie. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 85-107.
52. Zha, T., A. Ryyppö, K.-Y. Wang and S. Kellomäki. 2001. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and temperature on needle growth, respiration and carbohydrate status in field-grown Scots pines during the needle expansion period. Tree Physiol. 21:1279-1287.
53. Zogg, G.P., D.R. Zak, A.J. Burton and K.S. Pregitzer. 1996. Fine root respiration in northern hardwood forests in relation to temperature and nitrogen availability. Tree Physiol. 16:719-725.