Adhesive thickness effects on the bond strength of a light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 254-259

  Arici, Selim ^a   Caniklioglu, Cem Mustafa ^b   Arici, Nursel ^a   Ozer, Mete ^a   Oguz, Benan ^c  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Adhesive thickness; Bonding adhesives; Shear bond strength; Tensile bond strength

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; CARBON MONOXIDE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 16244375266     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andrews LF. Interviews on the straight-wire appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:493-508.
2. Buonocore MG. Principles of adhesion and adhesive restorative aterials. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963;67:382-391.
3. Schechter G, Caputo AA, Chaconas SJ. The effect of adhesive layer thickness on retention of direct bonded brackets. J Dent Res. 1980;59:285.
4. Evans L, Powers JM. Factors affecting in vitro bond strength of no-mix orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:508-513.
5. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Schiffer A, Miethke RR. The effect of adhesive layer thickness on bond strength. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:718-720.
6. Mackay F. The effect of adhesive type and thickness on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod. 1992;19:35-39.
7. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pre-treatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
8. McCabe JF, Carrick TE. A statistical approach to the mechanical testing of dental materials. Dent Mater. 1986;2:139-142.
9. Langlois R. Estimation of Weibull parameters. J Mater Sci Lett. 1991;10:1049-1051.
10. Eden GT, Graig RG, Peyton FA. Evaluation of a tensile test for direct filling resins. J Dent Res. 1970;49:428-434.
11. Ferguson JW, Read MJF, Watts DC. Bond strength of an integral bracket-base combination: an in-vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:267-276.
12. Merrill SW, Larry JO, Hermesch CB. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:290-297.
13. Katona TR, Moore K. The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets-a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:543-551.
14. Katona TR, Chen J. Engineering and experimental analyses of the tensile load applied during testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:167-174.
15. Katona TR. The effects of load location and misalignment on shear/peel testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets-a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:395-402.
16. Knox J, Kralj B, Hübsch PF, Middleton J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stress generated in a bonded bracket finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:43-53.
17. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:36-42.
18. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, Sfondrini G. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:30-35.
19. Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:348-353.
20. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. Bond strength of orthodontic bonding materials: an in vivo study. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:125-130.
21. Komori A, Ishikawa H. Evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for use as an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:189-196.
22. Chung C, Cuozzo PT, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:52-54.
23. Arici S, Arici N. Effects of thermocycling on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:692-696.
24. Jobalia SB, Valente RM, de Rijk WG, BeGole EA, Evans CA. Bond strength of visible light-cured glass ionomer orthodontic cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:205-208.
25. Millett DT, Cattanoch D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:58-64.
26. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-178.
27. Ostertag AJ, Dhuru VB, Ferguson DJ, Meyer RA. Shear, torsional, and tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets using three adhesive filler concentrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:251-258.