Bone formation at titanium implants prepared with iso- and anisotropic surfaces of similar roughness: An in vivo study

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 17-23

  Göransson, Anna ^a   Wennerberg, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Isotropy; Surface modification; Surface roughness; Titanium implants

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BONE TISSUE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; FEMUR; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

EID: 15944426386     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00042.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52:155-170.
2. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:161-172.
3. Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD. A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:173-179.
4. D'Lima DD, Lemperle SM, Chen PC, Holmes RE, Colwell CW Jr. Bone response to implant surface morphology. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13:928-934.
5. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Piattelli A, Scarano A. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:668-674.
6. BS 1134. Assessment of surface texture. Methods and instrumentation. General information and guidance. 1988.
7. Thomas T. Rough surfaces. 2nd Ed. London: Imperial College Press, 1999:35-90.
8. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:331-344.
9. Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. PhD thesis, Dept. of Biomaterial/Handicap Research, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden, 1996.
10. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25:889-902.
11. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2:120-128.
12. Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:11-19.
13. Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO(2) blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:128-134.
14. Donath K. Die Trenn-Dünnschliff-Technik zur Herstellung histologischer Präparate von nicht schneidbaren Geweben und Materialen. Der Präparator 1988; 34:197-206.
15. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 226-233.
16. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:266-272.
17. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 28:297-303.
18. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Gold J, Wennerberg A. The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: an in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 57:485-496.
19. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:302-310.
20. Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, et al. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998; 19:2219-2232.
21. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29:389-401.
22. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 32:55-63.
23. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, et al. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 39:77-85.
24. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Kang Y, Jeon DG, Albrektsson T. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002; 4:478-487.
25. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Röser K, Albrektsson T. Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. Biomaterials 2002; 23:1809-1817.
26. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13:252-259.
27. Ducheyne P, Willems G, Martens M, Helsen J. In vivo metal-ion release from porous titanium-fiber material. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18:293-308.
28. Blumenthal NC, Cosma V. Inhibition of apatite formation by titanium and vanadium ions. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23(A1 Suppl):13-22.