QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 56, Issue 413, 2005, Pages 967-976

  Yin, Xinyou ^a,b   Struik, Paul C ^b   Van Eeuwijk, Fred A ^b   Stam, Piet ^b   Tang, Jianjun ^a  

^a JIANGXI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ecophysiological modelling; Flowering time; Genotype phenotype relationship; Hordeum vulgare L.; Model input traits; Photoperiod; Quantitative trait loci; Temperatures

Indexed keywords

CROPS; ECOLOGY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ECOPHYSIOLOGICAL MODELING; FLOWERING PHENOLOGY; GENETIC MAPPING;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ARTICLE; BARLEY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHROMOSOME MAP; FLOWER; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; FLOWERS; HORDEUM; INBREEDING; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; TIME FACTORS;

BARLEY; ECOLOGY; FLOWERS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PHOTOPERIODISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; PLANTS;

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE;

EID: 15944420929     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri090     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742-754.
2. Jansen RC. 1995. Genetic mapping quantitative trait loci in plants: a novel statistical approach. PhD dissertation Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
3. Jiang CJ, Zeng ZB. 1995. Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 140, 1111-1127.
4. Jiang CJ, Zeng ZB. 1997. Mapping quantitative trait loci with dominant and missing markers in various crosses from two inbred lines. Genetica 101, 47-58.
5. Kearsey MJ, Pooni HS. 1996. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. London: Chapman and Hall.
6. Kleinhofs A, Kilian A. 1994. RFLP maps of barley. In: Phillips RL, Vasil IK, eds. DNA-based markers in plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 163-198
7. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Peterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD. 1988. Resolution of quantitative factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335, 721-726.
8. Peleman JD, van der Voort JR. 2003. Breeding by design. Trends in Plant Science 8, 330-334.
9. Reymond M, Muller B, Leonardi A, Charcosset A, Tardieu F. 2003. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiology 131, 664-675.
10. Ribaut J-M, Hoisington D. 1998. Marker-assisted selection: new tools and strategies. Trends in Plant Science 3, 236-239.
11. Slafer GA. 2003. Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop phyiologist's perspective. Annals of Applied Biology 142, 117-128.
12. Stratton DA. 1998. Reaction norm functions and QTL-environments for flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 81, 144-155.
13. Tardieu F. 2003. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 8, 9-14.
14. Van Eeuwijk FA, Denis JB, Kang MS. 1996. Incorporating additional information on genetics and environments in models for two-way genotype by environment interaction tables. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG, eds. Genotype-by- environment interaction. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 15-49.
15. Van Eeuwijk FA, Crossa J, Vargas M, Ribaut J-M. 2002. Analysing QTL by environment interaction by factorial regression, with an application to the CIMMYT drought and low nitrogen stress programme in maize. In: Kang MS, ed. Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. Wallingford: CAB International, 245-256.
16. Van Ooijen JW. 1999. LOD significance thresholds for QTL analysis in experimental populations of diploid species. Heredity 83, 613-624.
17. Van Ooijen JW, Boer MP, Jansen RC, Maliepaard C. 2002. MapQTL®4.0, software for the calculation of QTL positions on genetic maps. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Plant Research International.
18. Voorrips RE. 2002. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. Journal of Heredity 93, 77-78.
19. Weiss A. 2003. Introduction to the 'Crop modeling and genomics' symposium papers. Agronomy Journal 95, 1-3.
20. Yin X, Stam P, Dourleijn CJ, Kropff MJ. 1999. AFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield-determining physiological characters in spring barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99, 244-253.
21. Yin X, Chasalow S, Dourleijn CJ, Stam P, Kropff MJ. 2000a. Coupling estimated effects of QTLs for physiological traits to a crop growth model: Predicting yield variation among recombinant inbred lines in barley. Heredity 85, 539-549.
22. Yin X, Kropff MJ, Goudriaan J, Stam P. 2000b. A model analysis of yield differences among recombinant inbred lines in barley. Agronomy Journal 92, 114-120.
23. Yin X, Stam P, Kropff MJ, Schapendonk AHCM. 2003. Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding. Agronomy Journal 95, 90-98.
24. Yin X, Struik PC, Tang J, Qi C, Liu T. 2005. Model analysis of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 959-965.