Reaction norm functions and QTL-environment interactions for flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana

Heredity

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 144-155

  Stratton, Donald A ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Flowering date; Light intensity; Phenotypic plasticity; QTL environment interaction; Reaction norm function; Recombinant inbred lines

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIANCE; GENOTYPIC VARIATION; INBRED LINE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT;

ARABIDOPSIS; ENVIRONMENT; GENES, PLANT; LIGHT; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0032144215     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6883690     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ARNOLD, M. AND ANDERSON, M. 1996. The latest RI maps using Lister and Dean RI lines. Weeds World, 3, 1-6.
2. BERKE, T. G. AND ROCHEFORD, T. R. 1995. Quantitative trait loci for flowering, plant and ear height and kernel traits in maize. Crop Sci., 35, 1542-1549.
3. BRUMMER, E. C., GRAEF, G. L., ORF, J., WILCOX, J. R. AND SHOEMAKER, R. C. 1997. Mapping QTL for seed proteins and oil content in eight soybean populations. Crop Sci., 37, 370-378.
4. CHURCHILL, G. A. AND DOERGE, R. W. 1994. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics, 138, 963-971.
5. CLEVELAND, W. S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Am. Stat. Ass., 74, 829-836.
6. COUPLAND, G. 1995. Genetic and environmental control. of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Trends Genet., 11, 393-397.
7. CRESSIE, N. A. C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley, New York.
8. DENIS, J. B., PIEPHO, H. P. AND VAN EEUWIJK, F. A. 1997. Modelling expectation and variance for genotype by environment data. Heredity, 79, 162-171.
9. FRY, J. D. 1996. The evolution of host specialization: are trade-offs overrated? Am. Nat., 148, S84-S107.
10. GAVRILETS, S. AND SCHEINER, D. M. 1993. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VI. Theoretical predictions for directional selection. J. Evol. Biol., 6, 49-68.
11. GOMULKIEWICZ, R. AND KIRKPATRICK, M. 1992. Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolution, 46, 390-411.
12. HALEY, C. S. AND KNOTT, S. A. 1992. A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity, 69, 315-324.
13. JANSEN, R. C. 1993. Interval mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 135, 205-211.
14. JANSEN, R. C., VAN OOIJEN, J. W., STAM, P., LISTER, C. AND DEAN, C. 1995. Genotype-by-environment interaction in genetic mapping of multiple quantitative trait loci. Theor. Appl. Genet., 91, 33-37.
15. DE JONG, G. 1990. Quantitative genetics of reaction norms. J. Evol. Biol., 3, 447-468.
16. DE JONG, G. 1995. Phenotypic plasticity as a product of selection in a variable environment. Am. Nat., 145, 493-512.
17. KANG, M. S. 1990. Genotype by Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
18. KOESTER, R. P., SISCO, P. H. AND STUBER, C. W. 1993. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling days to flowering and plant height in two near isogenic lines of maize. Crop Sci., 33, 1209-1216.
19. KOORNNEEF, M., HANHART, C. J. AND VAN DER VEEN, J. H. 1991. A genetic and physiological analysis of late-flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet., 229, 57-66.
20. LAI, C., LYMAN, R. F., LONG, A. D., LANGLEY, C. H. AND MACKAY, T. F. C. 1994. Naturally occurring variation in bristle number and DNA polymorphism at the scabrous locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Science, 266, 1697-1702.
21. LANDER, E. S. AND BOTSTEIN, D. 1989. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics, 121, 185-199.
22. LISTER, C. AND DEAN, C. 1993. Recombinant inbred lines for mapping RFLP and phenotypic markers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J., 4, 745-750.
23. LITTEL, R. C., MILLIKEN, G. A., STROUP, W. W. AND WOLFINGER, R. D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
24. LYNCH, M. AND GABRIEL, W. 1987. Environmental tolerance. Am. Nat., 129, 288-303.
25. MACKAY, T. F. C. AND LANGLEY, C. H. 1990. Molecular and phenotypic variation in the achaete-scute region of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature, 348, 64-65.
26. MARTINEZ, O. AND CURNOW, R. N. 1992. Estimating the locations and the sizes of the effects of quantitative trait loci using flanking markers. Theor. Appl. Genet., 85, 480-488.
27. MARTINEZ, O. AND CURNOW, R. N. 1994. Missing markers when estimating quantitative trait loci using regression mapping. Heredity, 73, 198-206.
28. MITCHELL-OLDS, T. 1996. Genetic constraints on life-history evolution: quantitative-trait loci influencing growth and flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution, 50, 140-145.
29. NAMKOONG, G., JONSSON, A. AND ERIKSSON, G. 1992. Genetic variation in nutrient response functions. Theor. Appl. Genet., 85, 165-172.
30. PATTERSON, A. H., DAMON, S., HEWITT, J. D., ZAMIR, D., RABINOWITCH, H. D., LINCOLN, S. E. ET AL. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics, 127, 181-197.
31. PIGLIUCCI, M. 1996. How organisms respond to environmental changes: from phenotypes to molecules (and vice versa). Trends Ecol. Evol., 11, 168-173.
32. PIGLIUCCI, M. AND SCHLICHTING, C. D. 1995. Reaction norms of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). III. Response to nutrients in 26 populations from a worldwide collection. Am. J. Bot., 82, 1117-1125.
33. PIGLIUCCI, M., WHITTON, J. AND SCHLICHTING, C. D. 1995. Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. I. Plasticity of characters and correlations across water, nutrient and light gradients. J. Evol. Biol., 8, 421-438.
34. RAGOT, M., SISCO, P. H. AND STUBER, C. W. 1995. Molecular-marker-mediated characterization of favorable exotic alleles at quantitative trait loci in maize. Crop Sci., 35, 1306-1315.
35. SARI-GORLA, M., CALINSKI, T., KACZMAREK, Z. AND KRAJEWSKI, P. 1997. Detection of QTL x environment interaction in maize by a least squares interval mapping method. Heredity, 78, 146-157.
36. SCHEINER, S. M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 24, 35-68.
37. SCHLICHTING, C. D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 17, 667-693.
38. STUBER, C. W., LINCOLN, S. E., WOLFF, D. W., HELENTJARIS, T. AND LANDER, E. S. 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics, 132, 823-839.
39. SULTAN, S. 1987. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evol. Biol., 21, 127-176.
40. TINKER, N. A., MATHER, D. E., ROSSNAGEL, B. G., KASHA, K. J., KLEINHOFS, A., HAYES, P. M. ET AL. 1996. Regions of the genome that affect agronomic performance in two-row barley. Crop Sci., 36, 1053-1062.
41. TROENDLE, J. F. 1995. A stepwise resampling method for multiple hypothesis testing. J. Am. Stat. Ass., 90, 370-378.
42. VIA, S., GOMULKIEWICZ, R., DE JONG, G., SCHEINER, S. M., SCHLICHTING, C. D. AND VAN TIENDEREN, P. H. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19, 212-217.
43. XU, S. 1995. A comment on the simple regression method for interval mapping. Genetics, 141, 1657-1659.
44. ZENG, Z. B. 1994. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 136, 1457-1468.