Model analysis of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 56, Issue 413, 2005, Pages 959-965

  Yin, Xinyou ^a,b   Struik, Paul C ^b   Tang, Jianjun ^a   Qi, Changhan ^a   Liu, Taoju ^a  

^a JIANGXI AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Daylength; Ecophysiological modelling; Flowering; Genotype by environment interaction; Hordeum vulgare; Phenology; Photoperiod; Temperature

Indexed keywords

GENES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GROWTH KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

FLOWERING PHENOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPES; PHOTOPERIODS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ARTICLE; BARLEY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FLOWER; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; STATISTICAL MODEL; TEMPERATURE; TIME;

FLOWERS; HORDEUM; INBREEDING; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTOPERIOD; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE;

EID: 15944426146     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eri089     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams SR, Pearson S, Hadley P. 1998. An appraisal of the use of reciprocal transfer experiments: assessing the stages of photoperiod sensitivity in chrysanthemum cv. Snowdon (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.). Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 1405-1411.
2. Adams SR, Pearson S, Hadley P. 2001. Improving quantitative flowering models through a better understanding of the phases of photoperiod sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 655-662.
3. Boote KJ, Jones JW, Batchelor WD, Nafziger ED, Myers O. 2003. Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-soybean model: links to field performance and genomics. Agronomy Journal 95, 32-51.
4. Chandraratna MF. 1948. The effect of daylength on heading time in rice. Tropical Agriculture 104, 130-140.
5. Cao W, Moss DN. 1989. Temperature effect on leaf emergence and phyllochron in wheat and barley. Crop Science 29, 1018-1021.
6. Ellis RH, Collinson ST, Hudson D, Patefield WM. 1992. The analysis of reciprocal transfer experiments to estimate the durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of plant development: an example in soya bean. Annals of Botany 70, 87-92.
7. Ellis RH, Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ, Cooper JP. 1988. Environmental control of flowering in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). II. Rate of development as a function of temperature and photoperiod and its modification by low-temperature vernalization. Annals of Botany 62, 145-158.
8. Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH. 1990. Flowering in faba bean: genotypic differences in photoperiod sensitivity, similarity in temperature sensitivity, and implications for screening germplasm. Annals of Botany 65, 129-138.
9. Goudriaan J, van Laar HH. 1994. Modelling potential crop growth processes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10. Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR. 2002. Future contributions of crop modeling - from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 15-31.
11. Kiniry JR, Ritchie JT, Musser RL, Flint EP, Iwig WC. 1983. The photoperiod sensitive interval in maize. Agronomy Journal 75, 687-690.
12. Lawn RJ, Summerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Qi A, Roberts EH, Chay PM, Brouwer JB, Rose JL, Yeates SJ. 1995. Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. VI. Applications in crop improvement. Experimental Agriculture 31, 89-108.
13. Loomis RS, Connor DJ. 1992. Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Matthews RB, Hunt LA. 1994. GUMCAS: a model describing the growth of cassava (Manihot esculenta L. Crantz). Field Crops Research 36, 69-84.
15. Mozley D, Thomas B. 1995. Developmental and photobiological factors affecting photoperiodic induction in Arabidopsis thaliana Heynh. Landsberg erecta. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 173-179.
16. Reymond M, Muller B, Leonardi A, Charcosset A, Tardieu F. 2003. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiology 131, 664-675.
17. Slafer GA. 2003. Genetic basis of yield as viewed from a crop physiologist's perspective. Annals of Applied Biology 142, 117-128.
18. Slafer GA, Rawson HM. 1995. Development in wheat as affected by timing and length of exponsure to long photoperiod. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 1877-1886.
19. Tamaki M, Kondo S, Goto Y. 2002. Temperature response of leaf emergence and leaf growth in barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 138, 17-20.
20. Tardieu F. 2003. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 8, 9-14.
21. Yan W, Hunt LA. 1999. An equation for modelling the temperature responses of plants using only the cardinal temperatures. Annals of Botany 84, 607-614.
22. Yin X, Kropff MJ, McLaren G, Visperas RM. 1995. A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 77, 1-16.
23. Yin X, Kropff MJ, Ynalvez MA. 1997a. Photoperiodically sensitive and insensitive phases of preflowering development in rice. Crop Science 37, 182-190.
24. Yin X, Kropff MJ, Horie T, Nakagawa H, Centeno HGS, Zhu D, Goudriaan J. 1997b. A model for photothermal responses of flowering in rice. I. Model description and parameterization. Field Crops Research 51, 189-200.
25. Yin X, Kropff MJ, Horie T, Nakagawa H, Goudriaan J. 1997c. A model for photothermal responses of flowering in rice. II. Model evaluation. Field Crops Research 51, 201-211.
26. Yin X, Kropff MJ, Goudriaan J, Stam P. 2000. A model analysis of yield differences among recombinant inbred lines in barley. Agronomy Journal 92, 114-120.
27. Yin X, Stam P, Kropff MJ, Schapendonk AHCM. 2003. Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding. Agronomy Journal 95, 90-98.
28. Yin X, Struik PC, van Eeuwijk FA, Stam P, Tang J. 2005. QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 56, 967-976.