Identification of functional modules in protein complexes via hyperclique pattern discovery

Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2005, PSB 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 221-232

  Xiong, Hui ^a,b   He, Xiaofeng ^b   Ding, Chris ^b   Zhang, Ya ^b,c   Kumar, Vipin ^a   Holbrook, Stephen R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION PATTERNS; BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; CELLULAR PATHWAY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FUNCTIONAL MODULES; GENE ONTOLOGY; HIGHER-ORDER; HYPERCLIQUE PATTERN; PATTERN DISCOVERY; PROTEIN COMPLEXES;

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS;

PROTEINS;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FUNGAL PROTEINS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 15944412875     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. R. Agrawal, T. Imielinski, and A. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases., In ACM SIGMOD, 1993.
2. G.D. Bader and C.W. Hogue. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nature Biotechnology, 2002.
3. W.L. Delano. The PyMOL User's Manual DeLano Scientific, 2002.
4. M. Deng, F. Sun, and T. Chen. Assessment of the reliability of protein- protein interactions and protein function prediction. Pac Symp Biocom- put, pages 140-151, 2003.
5. C. Ding, X. He, R.F. Meraz, and S.R. Holbrook. A unified representation of multi-protein complex data for modeling interaction networks. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, to appear, 2004.
6. S. S. Dwight, M. A. Dolinski, and K. Ball et al. Saccharomyces genome database (sgd) provides secondary gene annotation using the gene ontology (go). Nucleic Acids Research, 2002.
7. A. Gavin et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415:141-147, 2002.
8. Y. Ho et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415:180-183, 2002.
9. T. Ito, T. Chiba, R. Ozawa, M. Yoshida, M. Hattori, and Y. Sakaki. A comprehensive two hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interaction. in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 98(8):4569-4574, 2001.
10. A. Kumar and M. Snyder. Protein complexes take the bait. Nature, 415:123-124, 2002.
11. C. Mering, R. Krause, B. Snel, M. Cornell, S.G. Oliver, S. Fields, and P. Bork. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein- protein interactions. Nature, 417, 2002.
12. J.B. Pereira-Leal, A.J. Enright, and C.A. Ouzounis. Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks. PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 54:49-57, 2004.
13. V. Spirin and L.A. Mirny. Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(21):12123-12128, October 2003.
14. P. Uetz, L. Cagney, and G. Mansfield et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403:623-627, 2000.
15. H. Xiong, P. Tan, and V. Kumar. Mining strong affinity association patterns in data sets with skewed support distribution. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 387-394, 2003.