Molecular systematics of Eumolpinae and the relationships with Spilopyrinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 584-600

  Gómez Zurita, Jesús ^a,b,d   Jolivet, Pierre ^c   Vogler, Alfried P ^a,b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c Universidad de Murcia ^*  (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Direct optimization; Leaf beetles; Phylogeny; Ribosomal markers; Southern hemisphere

Indexed keywords

CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; EUMOLPINAE; PYGIDIUM;

EID: 15944391380     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. F.K. Barker, and F.M. Lutzoni The utility of the incongruence length difference test Syst. Biol. 51 2002 625 637
2. J. Bechyné, and B.S. Bechyné La posición sistemática de Megascelis Chevrolat (Col., Phytophaga) Rev. Fac. Agr., Univ. Central de Venezuela 5 1969 65 76
3. K. Bremer The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction Evolution 42 1988 795 803
4. F. Chapuis Famille des Phytophages T. Lacordaire F. Chapuis Histoire naturelle des Insectes Genera des Coléoptéres vol. 11 1874 Libraire Encyclopédique de Roret Paris
5. M.L. Cox The pupae of Chrysomeloidea and their use in phylogeny (Coleoptera) Mus. reg. Sci. Nat. Torino 1998 1998 73 90
6. R.A. Crowson The Natural Classification of the Families of Coleoptera 1955 Nathaniel Lloyd London pp. 187
7. K. Dolphin, R. Belshaw, C.D.L. Orme, and D.L.J. Quicke Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17 2000 401 406
8. C.N. Duckett, J.J. Gillespie, and K.M. Kjer Relationships among the subfamilies of Chrysomelidae inferred from small subunit ribosomal DNA and morphology, with special emphasis on the relationship among the flea beetles and the Galerucinae P. Jolivet J.A. Santiago-Blay M. Schmitt New Developments in the Biology of Chrysomelidae 2004 SPB Academic Publ. bv The Hague, The Netherlands 3 18
9. B.D. Farrell 'Inordinate Fondness' explained: Why are there so many beetles? Science 281 1998 555 559
10. B.D. Farrell, and A.S. Sequeira Evolutionary rates in the adaptive radiation of beetles on plants Evolution 58 2004 1984 2001
11. R.W. Flowers La subfamilia Eumolpinae (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) en América Central Rev. Biol. Trop. (special publication) 2 1996 1 60
12. R.W. Flowers Internal structure and phylogenetic importance of male genitalia in the Eumolpinae M.L. Cox Advances in Chrysomelidae Biology. I. 1999 Backhuys Publishers Leiden, The Netherlands 71 93
13. J. Gatesy, P. O'Grady, and R.H. Baker Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level Artiodactyl taxa Cladistics 15 1999 271 313
14. J. Gómez-Zurita Molecular systematics and time-scale for the evolution of Timarcha, a leaf-beetle genus with a disjunct Holarctic distribution Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32 2004 647 665
15. A.L. Hipp, J.C. Hall, and K.J. Sytsma Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test Syst. Biol. 53 2004 81 89
16. G.H. Horn The Eumolpini of Boreal America Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 19 1892 195 234
17. Jacoby, M., 1888. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera, Supplement to Phytophaga, vol. 6, pt. 1, Suppl., 1-80
18. V. Jerez Stenomela pallida Erichson, 1847. Redescripcion, ontogenia y afinidad con el genero Hornius (Chrys. Eumolpinae) Gayana Zool. 59 1995 1 12
19. V. Jerez, and H. Ibarra-Vidal Morfologia y bionomia de Hornius grandis (Phil., 1864) (Chrys. Eumol.) Bol. Soc. Biol. Concepcion, Chile 63 1992 93 100
20. P. Jolivet L'aile des Chrysomeloidea (Coleoptera) Misc. Entom. 48 1954 85 101
21. Jolivet, P., 1957-1959. Recherches sur l'aile des Chrysomeloidea. Mem. Inst. R. Sc. Nat. Belgique 2° sér. 51, 1-180; 58, 1-252
22. Jolivet, P., 1957-1959. Recherches sur l'aile des Chrysomeloidea. Mem. Inst. R. Sc. Nat. Belgique 2° sér. 51, 1-180; 58, 1-252
23. P. Jolivet Biologie des Coléoptères Chrysomélides 1997 Boubée Publishers Paris
24. P. Jolivet, and K.K. Verma Biology of Leaf Beetles 2002 Intercept Publishers Andover, UK
25. H. Kishino, and M. Hasegawa Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea J. Mol. Evol. 29 1989 170 179
26. A.M. Lea Notes on Australian Eumolpides (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae), with descriptions of new species Trans. Proc. R. Soc. South Australia 39 1915 102 339
27. J.E. Lee Description of first-instar larva of Syneta adamsi Baly from Japan, with notes on the systematic position of Synetinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Esakia 29 1990 77 81
28. E. Lefèvre Eumolpidarum Hujusque Cognitarum Catalogus 1885 Hayez Bruxelles
29. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
30. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2003. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 1.0. Available from: 〈 http:// mesquiteproject.org 〉
31. M.F. Mickevich, and J.S. Farris The implications of congruence in Menidia Syst. Zool. 30 1981 351 370
32. A. Phillips, D. Janies, and W.C. Wheeler Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16 2000 317 330
33. C.A.M. Reid A cladistic analysis of subfamilial relationships in the Chrysomelidae sensu lato (Chrysomeloidea) J. Pakaluk S.A. Slipinski Biology, Phylogeny and Classification of Coleoptera. Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Roy A. Crowson 1995 Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN Warszawa 559 631
34. C.A.M. Reid Spilopyrinae Chapuis: a new subfamily in the Chrysomelidae and its systematic placement Inv. Tax. 14 2000 837 862
35. T.N. Seeno, and J.A. Wilcox Leaf beetle genera Entomography 1 1982 1 221
36. B.J. Selman A revision of the Nodini and a key to the genera of Eumolpidae of Africa (Col. Eumolpidae) Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Ent. 16 1965 143 174
37. V.L. Shull, A.P. Vogler, M.D. Baker, D.R. Maddison, and P.M. Hammond Sequence alignment of 18S ribosomal RNA and the basal relationships of Adephagan beetles: evidence for monophyly of aquatic families and the placement of the Trachypachidae Syst. Biol. 50 2001 945 969
38. C. Simon, F. Frati, A.T. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87 1994 651 701
39. B. Springlová Essai monographique du genre Eumolpus (Coleoptera Phytophaga) Mem. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belgique 60 1960 1 79
40. Swofford, D.L., 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts
41. K.K. Verma, and P. Jolivet Phylogeny of Synetinae-reconsidered Nouv. Revue Ent. (N.S.) 17 2000 35 49
42. K.K. Verma, and P. Jolivet Comments on Spilopyrinae (Col. Chrys.) Nouv. Revue Ent. (N.S.) 19 2002 99 110
43. W.C. Wheeler Sequence alignment, parameter sensitivity, and the phylogenetic analysis of molecular data Syst. Biol. 44 1995 321 331
44. W.C. Wheeler Optimization alignment: the end of multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetics? Cladistics 12 1996 1 9
45. W.C. Wheeler Measuring topological congruence by extending character techniques Cladistics 15 1999 131 135
46. W.C. Wheeler Implied alignment: a synapomorphy-based multiple-sequence alignment method and its use in cladogram search Cladistics 19 2003 261 268
47. Wheeler, W.C., Gladstein, D., DeLaet, J., 2002. POY version 3.0. Phylogeny reconstruction via Direct Optimization of DNA and other data. American Museum of Natural History, New York