Beyond similarity-based methods to associate genes for the inference of function

Drug Discovery Today: BIOSILICO

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 89-96

  Shon, John ^a   Park, John Y ^a   Wei, Liping ^a  

^a Nexus Genomics Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE PRODUCT;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE FUNCTION; GENE FUSION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MIMICRY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 15944381986     PISSN: 17418364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1478-5382(03)02318-7     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Koonin, E.V. et al. (1998) Beyond complete genomes: from sequence to structure and function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 355-363
2. Brenner, S.E. et al. (1998) Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6073-6078
3. Needleman, S.B. and Wunsch, C.D. (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48, 443-453
4. Smith, T.F. and Waterman, M.S. (1981) Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147, 195-197
5. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410
6. Holm, L. and Sander, C. (1993) Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233, 123-138
7. Feng, Z.K. and Sippl, M.J. (1996) Optimum superimposition of protein structures: ambiguities and implications. Fold. Des. 1, 123-132
8. Lackner, P. et al. (2000) ProSup: a refined tool for protein structure alignment. Protein Eng. 13, 745-752
9. Hegyi, H. and Gerstein, M. (2001) Annotation transfer for genomics: measuring functional divergence in multi-domain proteins. Genome Res. 11, 1632-1640
10. Pellegrini, M. et al. (1999) Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 4285-4288
11. Zheng, Y. et al. (2002) Genomic functional annotation using co-evolution profiles of gene clusters. Genome Biol. 3, research60
12. Overbeek, R. et al. (1999) The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 2896-2901
13. Kolesov, G. et al. (2001) SNAPping up functionally related genes based on context information: a colinearity-free approach. J. Mol. Biol. 311, 639-656
14. Marcotte, E.M. et al. (1999) Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science 285, 751-753
15. Velculescu, V.E. et al. (1995) Serial analysis of gene expression. Science 270, 484-187
16. Quackenbush, J. (2001) Computational analysis of microarray data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 418-127
17. Gibbons, F.D. and Roth, F.P. (2002) Judging the quality of gene expression-based clustering methods using gene annotation. Genome Res. 12, 1574-1581
18. Issel-Tarver, L. et al. (2002) Saccharomyces Genome Database. Methods Enzymol. 350, 329-346
19. Walker, M.G. et al. (1999) Prediction of gene function by genome-scale expression analysis: prostate cancer-associated genes. Genome Res. 9, 1198-1203
20. Thompson, H.G. et al. (2002) Identification and confirmation of a module of coexpressed genes. Genome Res. 12, 1517-1522
21. Zhou, X. et al. (2002) Transitive functional annotation by shortest-path analysis of gene expression data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 12783-12788
22. Ashburner, M. et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29
23. Uetz, P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627
24. Ito, T. et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 4569-4574
25. Gaviri, A.C. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415, 141-147
26. Sprinzak, E. and Margalit, H. (2001) Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 311, 681-692
27. Mulder, N.J. et al. (2002) InterPro: an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Brief Bioinform. 3, 225-235
28. Tong, A.H. et al. (2002) A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295, 321-324
29. Bader, G.D. et al. (2003) BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 248-250
30. Raychaudhuri, S. et al. (2002) Using text analysis to identify functionally coherent gene groups. Genome Res. 12, 1582-1590
31. Chaussabel, D. and Sher, A. (2002) Mining microarray expression data by literature profiling. Genome Biol. 3, research55
32. Eisen, M.B. et al. (1998) Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14863-14868
33. Ideker, T. et al. (2001) Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292, 929-934
34. Jansen, R. et al. (2002) Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res. 12, 37-16
35. Werner-Washburne, M. et al. (2002) Comparative analysis of multiple genome-scale data sets. Genome Res. 12, 1564-1573
36. Marcotte, E.M. et al. (1999) A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402, 83-86
37. Gerstein, M. et al. (2002) Proteomics. Integrating interactomes. Science 295, 284-287