Biogeographic interpretation of splits graphs: Least squares optimization of branch lengths

Systematic Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 56-65

  Winkworth, Richard C ^a   Bryant, David ^b   Lockhart, Peter J ^c   Havell, David ^d   Moulton, Vincent ^e  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^d Universal College of Learning   (New Zealand)

^e UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Hybridization; Least squares; Recent species radiation; Reticulation; Split decomposition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BORAGINACEAE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NEW ZEALAND; PHYLOGENY; RANUNCULACEAE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BORAGINACEAE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GEOGRAPHY; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; NEW ZEALAND; PHYLOGENY; RANUNCULUS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 15944373186     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150590906046     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adachi, J., and M. Hasegawa. 1996. Instability of quartet analyses of molecular sequence data by the maximum likelihood method: The cetacea/artiodactyla relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16:72-76.
2. Aguilar, J. F., J. A. Rossello, and G. Nieto Feliner. 1999. Nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) concerted evolution in natural and artifical hybrids of Armeria (Plumbaginaceae). Mol. Ecol. 8:1341-1346.
3. Baldwin, B. G. 1992. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: An example from the Compositae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:3-16.
4. Baldwin, B. G., and R. H. Robichaux. 1995. Historical biogeography and ecology of the Hawaiian silversword alliance. Pages 259-287 in Hawaiian biogeography: Evolution on a hot spot archipelago (W. L. Wagner and V. A. Funk, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
5. Baldwin, B. G., and M. J. Sanderson. 1998. Age and diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Compositae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9402-9406.
6. Bandelt, H.-J., and A. Dress. 1992. Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:242-252.
7. Bandelt, H.-J., P. Forster, and A. Röhl. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:37-48.
8. Bandelt, H.-J., P. Forster, B. C. Sykes, and M. B. Richards. 1995. Mitochondrial portraits of human populations using median networks. Genetics 141:743-753.
9. Bandelt, H.-J., V. Macaulay, and M. Richards. 2000. Median networks: Speedy construction and greedy reduction, one simulation, and two case studies from human mtDNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16:8-28.
10. Bohle, U.-R., H. H. Hilger, and W. F. Martin. 1996. Island colonisation and evolution of the insular woody habit in Echium L. (Boraginaceae). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:11740-11745.
11. Buckler, E. S., A. Ippolito, and T. P. Holtsford. 1997. The evolution of ribosomal DNA: Divergent paralogues and phylogenetic implications. Genetics 145:821-832.
12. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and A. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550-570.
13. Comes, H. P., and J. W. Kadereit. 1998. The effect of Quaternary climatic changes on plant distribution and evolution. Trends Pl. Sci. 3:431-438.
14. Farris, J. S. 1972. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am. Nat. 106:645-668.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1984. Distance methods for inferring phylogenies: A justification. Evolution. 38:16-24.
16. Felsenstein, J. 2003. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
17. Fisher, F. J. F. 1965. The alpine Ranunculi of New Zealand. Botany Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Wellington.
18. Fitch, W. M., and E. Margoliash. 1967. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279-284.
19. Golub, G., and C. Van Loan. 1996. Matrix Computations, 4th Edition. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
20. Holland, B., and V. Moulton. 2003. Consensus networks: A method for visualising incompatibilities in collections of trees. Proceedings of the Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI), September 15-20, 2003 in Budapest, Hungary.
21. Huber, K., V. Moulton, P. J. Lockhart, and A. Dress. 2001. Pruned median networks: A technique for reducing the complexity of median networks. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19:302-310.
22. Huson, D. H. 1998. SplitsTree: Analysing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14:68-73.
23. Huson, D. H., and D. Bryant. 2004. SplitsTree4.0 beta 06. Distributed by the authors (http://www-ab.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/software/jsplits/ welcome_en.htm).
24. Kadereit, J. W., E. M. Griebeler, and H. P. Comes. 2004. Quaternary diversification in European alpine plants: pattern and process. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359:265-274.
25. Kotetishvili, M., O. C. Stine, A. Kreger, J. G. Morris, and A. Sulakvelidze. 2002. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of clinical and environmental salmonella strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1626-1635.
26. Legendre, P., and V. Makarenkov. 2002. Reconstruction of biogeographic and evolutionary networks using reticulograms. Syst. Biol. 51:199-216.
27. Lockhart, P. J., P. A. McLenachan, D. Havell, G. Glenny, D. Huson, and U. Jensen. 2001. Phylogeny, dispersal and radiation of New Zealand alpine buttercups: Molecular evidence under split decomposition. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 88:458-477.
28. Makarenkov, V., and P. Legendre. 2004. From a phylogenetic tree to a reticulated network. J. Comp. Biol. 11:195-212.
29. Philippe, H., and E. Douzery. 1994. The pitfalls of molecular phylogeny based on four species, as illustrated by the cetaceae/artiodactyla relationship. J. Mamm. Evol. 2:133-152.
30. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
31. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2001. Intraspecific gene genealogies: Trees grafting into networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:37-45.
32. Ranwez, V., and O. Gascuel. 2001. Quartet-based phylogenetic inference: Improvements and limits. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1103-1116.
33. Richardson, J. E., R. T. Pennington, T. D. Pennington, and P. M. Hollingsworth. 2001. Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of neotropical rain forest trees. Science 293:2242-2245.
34. Rieseberg, L. H., O. Raymond, D. M. Rosenthal, Z. Lai, K. Livingstone, T. Nakazato, J. L. Durphy, A. E. Schwarzbach, L. A. Donovan, and C. Lexer. 2003. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301:1211-1216.
35. Rieseberg, L. H., and J. F. Wendel. 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants. Pages 70-109 in Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process (R. G. Harrison, ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Rzhetsky, A., and M. Nei. 1993. Theoretical foundation of the minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1073-1095.
37. Sang, T., D. J. Crawford, and T. F. Stuessy. 1995. Documentation of reticulate evolution in peonies (Paeonia) using internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: Implications for biogeography and concerted evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6813-6817.
38. Schaal, B. A., D. A. Hayworth, K. M. Olsen, J. T. Rauscher, and W. A. Smith. 1998. Phylogeographic studies in plants: Problems and prospects. Mol. Ecol. 7:465-474.
39. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, T. G. Collier, and M. L. Edgerton. 1991. Chloroplast DNA variation within and among genera of the Heuchera group (Saxifragaceae): Evidence for chloroplast transfer and paraphyly. Am. J. Bot. 78:1091-1112.
40. Song, K., P. Lu, K. Tang, and T. C. Osborn. 1995. Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:7719-7723.
41. Sota, T., and A. P. Vogler. 2003. Reconstructing species phylogeny of carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: Heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analyses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26:139-154.
42. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.10b, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
43. Tanaka, J. S., and G. J. Huba. 1985. A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 38:197-201.
44. Templeton, A. R., K. A. Crandall, and C. F. Sing. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetic 132:619-633.
45. Webb, C. J., W. R. Sykes, and P. J. Garnock-Jones. 1988. Flora of New Zealand, Vol. 4 CRI. Landcare Research, New Zealand.
46. Whittlemore, A. T., and B. A. Schaal. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:2540-2544.
47. Winkworth, R. C., A. W. Robertson, J. Grau, and P. J. Lockhart. 2002. Biogeography of the cosmopolitan genus Myosotis (Boraginaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24:180-193.
48. Worobey, M., A. Rambaut, O. G. Pybus, D. L. Robertson, M. L. Gibbs, J. S. Armstrong, and A. J. Gibbs. 2002. Questioning the evidence for genetic recombination in the 1918 "Spanish Flu" virus. Science 296:211.