Developing a quality assurance system for computer-based learning materials: Problems and issues

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 417-426

  Sambrook, Sally ^a   Geertshuis, Susan ^b   Cheseldine, David ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15944371592     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930120081998     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aldrich, F., Rogers, Y. & Scaife, M. (1998) Getting to grips with 'interactivity'; helping teachers assess the educational value of CD-ROMS, British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), pp. 321-332.
2. Bahr, N. & Bahr, M. (2000) Student diversity-can innovative curriculum deign meet the challenge? Paper presented at the Society for Research into Higher Education conference, Stirling University, 12-13 June.
3. Braten, I. & Olaussen, B. S. (1998) The relationship between motivational beliefs and learning strategy use among Norwegian college students, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, pp. 182-194.
4. Braverman, H. (1974) Labour and Monopoly Capital Monthly Review Press
5. Britain, S. & Liber, O. (1999) A Framework for Pedagogical Evaluation for Virtual Learning Environments. JISC Technology Applications Programme, Report 41.
6. Brosnan, M. J. (1998) The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), pp. 223-234.
7. Bryman, A. (Ed.) (1988) Doing Research in Organisations (London, Routledge).
8. BSI (1991) BS 5750 Quality Systems Part 8: Guide to Quality Management and Quality Systems Elements for Services (British Standards Institute). Canberra University (circa 1997) Evaluation Criteria for Flexible Learning Systems (http://beth.canberra.edu.au/OldUnits/idhci/fiexeval.html).
9. CEDEFOP (http://www.trainingvillage.gr/etv/ictrrb/page).
10. CEDEFOP (http://www.trainingvillage.gr/etv/ictrrb/plate).
11. DfEE (1998) University for Industry Pathfinder Prospectus (London, DfEE Publications).
12. Doherty, G. (1994) (Ed.) Developing Quality Systems in Education (London, Routledge).
13. Ely, D. (1999) Towards a philosophy of instructional technology: thirty years on, British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), pp. 305-310.
14. Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM) (undated) Guidelines for Resource Evaluation (http://www.geminfo.org/Workbench/quality.html).
15. Gillies, A. C. (1992) Software Quality: theory and management (London, Chapman & Hall).
16. IITT (1998) Technology Based Training Accreditation Programme and Code of Practice for TBT Providers, Standards for TBT Learning Materials, Competencies for Developers of TBT Learning Materials (Institute of IT Training).
17. IITT (2000) http://www.iitt.org.uk/s-tbtmats.html (accessed 21 March 2000).
18. The Institute of Learning and Teaching www.ilt.ac.uk (accessed 22 May 2000).
19. Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology (London, Routledge).
20. Lee, D. (1997) Factors influencing the success of computer skills in learning among in-service teachers, Colloquium, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(2), pp. 139-141.
21. Marchmont (undated) The Marchmont Project: Research for the Learning Age. (March-mont@exeter.ac.uk).
22. McAteer, E. & Shaw, R. (1995) The Design of Multimedia Learning Programs (Glasgow, The EMASHE Group, University of Glasgow).
23. Minnesota University (undated) Minnesota's Virtual University Guidelines for Quality Learning Resources (http://www.mnvu.extension.umn.edu/Othre/jorn.html).
24. NCIHE(1997) National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society (Hayes, National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education).
25. OCC (1998) Guidelines for Evaluating Learning Resources (Ontario, Ontario Curriculum Clearinghouse). (http://www.curriculum.org/eval.html).
26. Postle, G. D. & Sturman, A. (2000) Models of learning as a factor in online education: an Australian case study. Paper presented at the Society for Research into Higher Education conference, Stirling University, 12-13 June.
27. Sharpe, R. & Bailey, P. (1999) Evaluation and design of technologies to meet learning outcomes, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, pp. 179-188.
28. SOSIG (Social Science Information Gateway) (undated) Quality Selection Criteria for Information Gateways (http://www.sosig.ac.uk/desire/q1cont.html).
29. TFT (1999) Criteria for the Design and Evaluation of TBT Materials (http://www.tft.co.uk/products/de-sign.html).
30. Thorpe, M. (1999) New technology and pedagogical challenges, Lifelong Learning in Europe IV(1), pp. 40-46.
31. TrainingZone (2000) http://www.trainingzone.co (News page, accessed 21 March 2000).
32. Ufi (undated) A New Way of Learning: The Ufi Network-Developing the University for Industry Concept.
33. University for Industry (undated) (http://www.ufiltd.co.uk).