Late multidisciplinary rehabilitation in young people after stroke

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 111-116

  O'Connor, Rory J ^a,c   Cassidy, Eugene M ^b,c   Delargy, Mark A ^c  

^a LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Medicine National University of Ireland Cork   (Ireland)

^c The National Rehabilitation Hospital   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; IRELAND; MALE; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT TRANSPORT; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; STROKE; TEAMWORK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRELAND; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE TEAM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION;

EID: 15844373338     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280400007414     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kim P, Warren S, Madill H, Hadley M. Quality of life of stroke survivors. Quality of Life Research 1999;8:293-301.
2. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke: the value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997;28:1541-1549.
3. Sulch D, Perez I, Melbourn A, Kalra L. Randomized controlled trial of integrated (managed) care pathway for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2000;31:1929-1934.
4. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke: stroke unit trialists' collaboration. British Medical Journal 1997;314:1151-1159.
5. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;354:191-196.
6. Ronning OM, Guldvog B. Outcome of subacute stroke rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1998;29:779-784.
7. Alexander H, Bugge C, Hagen S. What is the association between the different components of stroke rehabilitation and health outcomes? Clinical Rehabilitation 2001;15:207-215.
8. Edwards SG, Thompson AJ, Losseff N, Playford ED. Shortening inpatient stay for stroke. Lancet 2002;359:2205.
9. Fan CW, McDonnell R, Johnson Z, O'Keeffe S, Crowe MJ. Hospital-based stroke care in Ireland: results from one regional register. Irish Journal of Medical Science 2000;169:30-33.
10. Collins D, McConaghy D, McMahon A, Howard D, O'Neill D, McCormack PM. An acute stroke service: potential to improve patient outcome without increasing length of stay. Irish Medical Journal 2000;93:84-86.
11. Torenbeek M, Caulfield B, Garrett M, Van Harten W. Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the ACROSS project. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2001;24:95-101.
12. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965;16:61-65.
13. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Home V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Studies 1988;10:61-63.
14. Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001;23:670-676.
15. van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1999;66:480-484.
16. Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2002;55:922-928.
17. Post MW, Visser-Meily JM, Gispen LS. Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16:182-189.
18. O'Connor RJ, Cano SJ, Thompson AJ, Hobart JC. Exploring rating scale responsiveness: does the total score reflect the sum of its parts? Neurology 2004;62:1842-1844.
19. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975;12:189-198.
20. O'Neill D, O'Shea B, Walsh JB, Coakley D. Screening for dementia and delirium using an adapted Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination. Irish Medical Journal 1989;82:24-25.
21. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 1992;40:922-935.
22. Bridges KW, Goldberg DP. The validation of the GHQ-28 and the use of the MMSE in neurological in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 1986;148:548-553.
23. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992;30:473-483.
24. Blake C, Codd MB, O'Meara YM. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey: normative data for the Irish population. Irish Journal of Medical Science 2000;169:195-200.
25. Anderson C, Laubscher S, Burns R. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire Among Stroke Patients. Stroke 1996;27:1812.
26. de Haan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Hewer RL, van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 1993;24:320-327.
27. Hobart JC, Williams LS, Moran K, Thompson AJ. Quality of life measurement after stroke: uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke 2002;33:1348-1356.
28. Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001;33:47-48.
29. SPSS for Windows. Release 11.0 edition New Jersey: SPSS, 2002.
30. Sim TC, Lum CM, Sze FK, Or KH, Sum C, Woo J. Outcome after stroke rehabilitation in Hong Kong. Clinical Rehabilitation 1997;11:236-242.
31. van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthel index. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1996;49:39-44.
32. Post MW, de Bruin A, de Witte L, Schrijvers A. The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;77:440-445.
33. Wade DT. Randomized controlled trials-a gold standard? Clinical Rehabilitation 1999;13:453-455.
34. Black N. Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. British Medical Journal 1996;312:1215-1218.
35. Jackson D, Thornton H, Turner-Stokes L. Can young severely disabled stroke patients regain the ability to walk independently more than three months post stroke? Clinical Rehabilitation 2000;14:538-547.
36. Nolfe G, D'Aniello AM, Muschera R, Giaquinto S. The aftermath of rehabilitation for patients with severe stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandanavia 2003;107:281-284.
37. Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. International Disabilities Studies 1990;12:119-122.
38. Ferrucci L, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, Lamponi M, Bertini C, Falchini M, et al. Recovery of functional status after stroke. A postrehabilitation follow-up study. Stroke 1993;24:200-205.
39. Paolucci S, Grasso MG, Antonucci G, Bragoni M, Troisi E, Morelli D, et al. Mobility status after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: 1-year follow-up and prognostic factors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82:2-8.
40. Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S, Ermani M, Pizzolato G, Iaia V, et al. The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke 1993;24:1186-1191.
41. Bergner M, Rothman ML. Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. Annual Review of Public Health 1987;8:191-210.
42. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assesment of quality-of-life outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine 1996;334:835-840.
43. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine 1993;118:622-629.
44. Tennant A, Geddes J, Chamberlain MA. The Barthel index: an ordinal score or interval level measure? Clinical Rehabilitation 1996;10:301-308.
45. Grimby G, Gudjonsson G, Rodhe M, Sunnerhagen KS, Sundh V, Ostensson ML. The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1996;28:51-62.