Silylated gallium-sulfur ring systems as single source precursors to hexagonal gallium sulfide (GaS)

Materials Science and Engineering: B

Volumn 116, Issue 3 SPEC.ISS., 2005, Pages 375-379

  Medina, Iliana ^a   Fink, Mark J ^a  

^a Tulane University   (United States)

Author keywords

Gallium sulfide; Organometallic chemical vapor deposition; Thin films

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION; ETHYLENE; HYDROCARBONS; MELTING; METALLORGANIC CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; THIN FILMS; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

EVOLVED GAS ANALYSIS (EGA); GALLIUM SULFIDE; HEXAGONAL LAYERED STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR PRECURSORS;

SEMICONDUCTING GALLIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 15744392281     PISSN: 09215107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2004.05.051     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. A.C. Jones, and P. O'Brien CVD of Compound Semiconductors: Precursor Synthesis and Development 1997 VCH New York
2. Abbreviations: CVD (chemical vapor deposition) AACVD (aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition).
3. P. O'Brien, N. Pickett, and D.J. Otway Chem. Vap. Deposition 8 2002 6
4. W. Hirpo, S. Dhingra, A.C. Sutorik, and M.G. Kanatidis J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 1993 1597
5. K.K. Banger, M.H.-C. Jin, J.D. Harris, P.E. Fanwick, and A.F. Hepp Inorg. Chem. 42 2003 7713
6. K.K. Banger, J.D. Harris, J.E. Cowen, and A.F. Hepp Thin Solid Films 403-404 2002 390
7. M. Lazell, P. O'Brien, D.J. Otway, and J.-H. Park J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000 4479
8. A.N. MacInnes, M.P. Power, and A.R. Barron Chem. Mater. 4 1992 11
9. G.A. Horley, M.R. Lazell, and P. O'Brien Chem. Vap. Deposition 5 1999 203
10. M.R. Lazell, P. O'Brien, D.J. Otway, and J.-H. Park Chem. Mater. 11 1999 3430
11. D.M. Hoffman, and S. Suh Chem. Mater. 12 2000 2794
12. 2 ring cores, M.S. thesis (M. Fink, advisor), Department of Chemistry, Tulane University, 2002.
13. Due to the relatively low melting point of the aluminum (mp = 660 °C), we did not set the temperature program past 500 °C.
14. The weight variance of the aluminum pan/lid assemblies do not contribute significantly to errors in % weight loss. A sample of 10 different assemblies gave a median weight of 56.76 mg with a standard deviation of 0.29 mg. Since average sample weights were approximately 35 mg the relative error is <1%.