A pentenyl dianion-based strategy for convergent synthesis of ene-1,5-diols

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 3694-3695

  Bahadoor, Adilah B ^a   Flyer, Alec ^a   Micalizio, Glenn C ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1,5 DIOL DERIVATIVE; ALCOHOL; ALDEHYDE; ANION; HOMOPROPARGYLIC ALCOHOL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; PROPIONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; CHIRALITY; DIASTEREOISOMER; REDUCTION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS;

ALCOHOLS; ALDEHYDES; ALKENES; ALKYNES; KETONES; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 15744384881     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja050039+     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Otera, J., Ed. Modern Carbonyl Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000.
2. Selected examples of convergent synthesis of polypropionates: (a) Evans, D. A.; Dart, M. J.; Duffy, J. L.; Rieger, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9073.
3. (b) Gustin, D. J.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Roush, W. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3447.
4. (c) Bode, J. W.; Fraefel, N.; Muri, D.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2082; for reviews see ref 1.
5. For a convergent approach to ene-1,5-diols centered about a disubstituted olefin, see: Flamme, E. M.; Roush, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13644 and references therein.
6. Hoffmann, R. W. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1841.
7. Hoveyda, A. H.; Evans, D. A.; Fu, G. C. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1307.
8. Masamune, S.; Choy, W.; Petersen, J. S.; Sita, L. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1.
9. (a) Danheiser, R. L.; Carini, D. J.; Kwasigroch, C. A. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 3870.
10. (b) Marshall, J. A.; Masxon, K. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 630.
11. See also: (c) Marshall, J. A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 31.
12. Buckle, M. J. C.; Fleming, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 2383.
13. See: Marshall, J. A.; Adams, N. D. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3812.
14. Harada, K.; Urabe, H.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3203. See also: Buchwald, S. L.; Nielsen, R. B. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 1047.
15. Harada, K.; Urabe, H.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3203. See also: Buchwald, S. L.; Nielsen, R. B. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 1047.
16. (a) Epstein, O. L.; Kulinkovich, O. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1823.
17. (b) Urabe, H.; Sato, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7329.
18. For reviews see. (c) Kulinkovich, O. G.; Meijere, A. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2789.
19. (d) Sato, F.; Urabe, H.; Okamoto, S. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2835.
20. (e) Marek, I., Ed. Titanium and Zirconium in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002.
21. No products were observed that indicated epimerization of the aldehyde.
22. For an interesting discussion of regioselectivity in allylic alkylation reactions based on diastereomeric π-allyl complexes, see: Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4545.
23. For examples of directed regioselective reductive coupling reactions with nickel complexes, see: (a) Mahandru, G. M.; Liu, G.; Montgomery, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3698.
24. (b) Miller, K. M.; Lauanphaisarnnont, T.; Molinaro, C.; Jamison, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4130.
25. (c) Miller, K. M.; Jamison, T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15342.
26. Reductive coupling reactions of the homopropargylic alcohol 12 with aldehydes lacking α- or β-branching were also regioselective (5:1 to 3:1). See Supporting Information.