Environmental tobacco smoke and pregnancy outcome

Epidemiology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 660-670

  Kharrazi, Martin ^a   DeLorenze, Gerald N ^b   Kaufman, Farla L ^c   Eskenazi, Brenda ^d   Bernert Jr , John T ^e   Graham, Steve ^c   Pearl, Michelle ^b   Pirkle, James ^e  

^a CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b Sequoia Foundation   (United States)

^c PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COTININE; TOBACCO SMOKE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; BRAIN WEIGHT; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL SERUM; PASSIVE SMOKING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREMATURE LABOR; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CALIFORNIA; COTININE; FEMALE; FETAL DEATH; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL EXPOSURE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION;

EID: 15744370229     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000142137.39619.60     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Serxner S, Catalano R, Dooley D, et al. Tobacco use: selection, stress, or culture? J Occup Med. 1991;33:1035-1039.
2. Shopland DR, Niemcryk SJ, Marconi KM. Geographic and gender variations in total tobacco use. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:103-106.
3. Giovino GA, Henningfield JE, Tomar SL, et al. Epidemiology of tobacco use and dependence. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17:48-65.
4. Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking? JAMA. 1998;280:893-899.
5. National Cancer Institute. Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke: The Report of the California Environmental Protection Agency. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph no. 10. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1999. NIH Pub. No. 99-4645.
6. World Health Organization. Tobacco Free Initiative: International Consultation on Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) and Child Health. Consultation Report. Jan 11-14, 1999; Geneva, Switzerland: 1-26. [serial online] Available at: http://www5.who.int/tobacco/page.cfm-?sid=50.
7. Windham GC, Eaton A, Hopkins B. Evidence for an association between environmental tobacco smoke exposure and birth weight: a meta-analysis and new data. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol. 1999;13:35-57.
8. Emmons KM, Abrams DB, Marshall R, et al. An evaluation of the relationship between self-report and biochemical measures of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Prev Med. 1994;23:35-39.
9. O'Connor TZ, Holfor TR, Leaderer BP, et al. Measurement of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in pregnancy women. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:1315-1321.
10. Kaufman FL, Kharrazi M, Delorenze GN, et al. Estimation of environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy using a single question on household smokers versus serum cotinine. J Exposure Analysis Environ Epidemiol. 2002;12:1-10.
11. DeLorenze GN, Kharrazi M, Kaufman FL, et al. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in pregnant women: the association between self-report and serum cotinine. Environ Research Section A. 2002;90: 21-32.
12. Haddow JE, Knight GJ, Palomaki GE, et al. Estimating fetal morbidity and mortality resulting from cigarette smoke exposure by measuring cotinine levels in maternal serum. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;281:289-300.
13. Rebagliato M, Florey Cdu V, Bolumar F. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in nonsmoking pregnant women in relation to birth weight. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:531-537.
14. Eskenazi B, Prehn AW, Christianson RE. Passive and active maternal smoking as measured by serum cotinine: the effect on birthweight. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:395-398.
15. Jaro M. Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files. Stat Med. 1995;14:491-498.
16. Benowitz NL, Kuyt F, Jacob P III, et al. Cotinine disposition and effects. Clin Pharmacol Therap. 1983;34:604-611.
17. Bernert JT Jr, Turner WE, Pirkle JL, et al. Development and validation of sensitive method for determination of serum cotinine in smokers and nonsmokers by liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 1997;43:2281-2291.
18. Taylor JK. Principles of measurement. In: Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers; 1987:75-93.
19. McLennan JE, Gules FH, Neff RK. A model of growth of the human fetal brain. In: Gilles FH, Leviton A, Dooling EC, eds. The Developing Human Brain: Growth and Epidemiologic Neuropathy. Boston: Wright PG; 1983:43-58.
20. Cleveland WS. Robust locally-weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74:829-836.
21. Wilcox AJ, Russell IT. Birthweight and perinatal mortality: I. On the frequency distribution of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol. 1983;12:314-318.
22. Wilcox AJ. The Analysis of Birth Weight and Infant Mortality. An Alternative Hypothesis. February 1, 2002. Available at: http://eb.niehs.nih.gov/ bwt.
23. English PB, Eskenazi B. Reinterpreting the effects of maternal smoking on infant birthweight and perinatal mortality: a multivariate approach to birthweight standardization. Int J Epidemiol. 1992;6:1097-1105.
24. Kramer MS, Liu S, Luo Z, et al. Analysis of perinatal mortality and its components: time for a change? Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156:493-497.
25. Carinci F. ATTRISK. A SAS macro for the computation of attributable risks according to the adjusted parameterization of a logistic regression. Unit of Statistics and Information Systems, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Italy. Adapted from: Bruzzi P, Green SB, Byar DP, et al. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:904-914.
26. Carinci F. ATTRISK. A SAS macro for the computation of attributable risks according to the adjusted parameterization of a logistic regression. Unit of Statistics and Information Systems, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Italy. Adapted from: Bruzzi P, Green SB, Byar DP, et al. Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:904-914.
27. Repace JL. Dietary nicotine. Won't mislead on passive smoking. BMJ. 1994;308:61-62.
28. Pirkle JL, Flegal KM, Bernert JT, et al. Exposure of the US population to environmental tobacco smoke: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1991. JAMA. 1996;275:1233-1240.
29. Siegmund G, Leitner E, Pfannhauser W. Determination of the nicotine content of various edible nightshades (Solanaceae) and their products and estimation of the associated dietary intake. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47:3113-3120.
30. Benowitz NL. Cotinine as a biomarker of environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Epidemiol Rev. 1996;18:188-204.
31. Dempsey D, Peyton J, Benowitz NL. Accelerated metabolism of nicotine and cotinine in pregnant smokers. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 2002; 301:594-598.
32. Eliopoulos C, Klein J, Phan MK, et al. Hair concentrations of nicotine and cotinine women and their newborn infants. JAMA. 1994;271:621-623.
33. Ostrea EM, Knapp K, Romero A, et al. Meconium analysis to assess fetal exposure to nicotine by active and passive maternal smoking. J Pediatr. 1994;124:471-476.
34. Jaakkola JJ, Jaakkola N, Zahlsen K. Fetal growth and length of gestation in relation to prenatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke assessed by hair nicotine concentration. Environ Health Perspect. 2001; 109:557-561.
35. Taylor AE, Johnson DC, Kazemi H. Environmental tobacco smoke and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1992;86:699-702.
36. Hood RD. An assessment of potential effects of environmental tobacco smoke on prenatal development and reproductive capacity. Environmental Tobacco Smoke. In: Ecobichon DJ, Wu JM, eds. Proceedings of the International Symposium at McGill University, 1989. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1990:241-268.
37. Guerin MR, Jenkins RA, Tomkins BA. The Chemistry of Environmental Tobacco Smoke. Composition and Measurement. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers; 1992.
38. Lambers DS, Clark KE. The maternal and fetal physiologic effects of nicotine. Semin Perinatol. 1996;20:115-126.
39. Longo LD. The biological effects of carbon monoxide on the pregnant woman, fetus, and newborn infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977;129:69-103.
40. Garvey DJ, Longo LD. Chronic low level maternal carbon monoxide exposure and fetal growth and development. Biol Reprod. 1978;19:8-14.
41. Sterling TD, Glicksman A, Perry H, et al. An alternative explanation for the apparent elevated relative mortality and morbidity risks associated with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:803-808.
42. US Public Health Service. The Health Consequences of Smoking. A Report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare. DHEW Publication No. (HSM) 1971:71-7513.
43. Abel EL. Smoking during pregnancy: a review of effects on growth and development of offspring. Hum Biol. 1980;52:593-625.
44. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, et al. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from non smokers. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:1435-1438.
45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Second National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. NCEH Publication No. 02-0716. January 2003:79-80.