-
2
-
-
0034700461
-
-
H. Ohno, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Omiya, E. Abe, T. Dietl, Y. Ohno, and K. Ohtani, Nature (London) 408, 944 (2000).
-
(2000)
Nature (London)
, vol.408
, pp. 944
-
-
Ohno, H.1
Chiba, D.2
Matsukura, F.3
Omiya, T.4
Abe, E.5
Dietl, T.6
Ohno, Y.7
Ohtani, K.8
-
3
-
-
0033553666
-
-
C. H. Ahn, S. Gariglio, P. Paruch, T. Tybell, L. Antognazza, and J.-M. Triscone, Science 284, 1152 (1999).
-
(1999)
Science
, vol.284
, pp. 1152
-
-
Ahn, C.H.1
Gariglio, S.2
Paruch, P.3
Tybell, T.4
Antognazza, L.5
Triscone, J.-M.6
-
4
-
-
15444381107
-
-
note
-
G) is injected only in the first layer at the interface.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
0742286297
-
-
M. Kiguchi, M. Nakayama, K. Fujiwara, K. Ueno, T. Shimada, and K. Saiki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 42, L1408 (2003).
-
(2003)
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
, vol.42
-
-
Kiguchi, M.1
Nakayama, M.2
Fujiwara, K.3
Ueno, K.4
Shimada, T.5
Saiki, K.6
-
7
-
-
15444367263
-
-
unpublished
-
2 substrate completely with their molecular long axes parallel to the surface ("lying"), and some molecules grew on the first layer with their molecular long axes normal to the surface ("standing"); M. Nakayama, M. Kiguchi, and K. Saiki (unpublished).
-
-
-
Nakayama, M.1
Kiguchi, M.2
Saiki, K.3
-
9
-
-
15444369194
-
-
note
-
This assumption is supported by the AFM results. The film nearly covered the substrate completely, although there were some grain boundaries. Furthermore the deviation of height in the island was about 2 nm, which corresponded to 1 monolayer thickness. These experimental results supports that the nearly ideal layer growth occurred under the present growth condition.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
0042058343
-
-
T. Komoda, Y. Endo, K. Kyuno, and A. Toriumi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 41, 2767 (2002).
-
(2002)
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1
, vol.41
, pp. 2767
-
-
Komoda, T.1
Endo, Y.2
Kyuno, K.3
Toriumi, A.4
-
11
-
-
33747670667
-
-
R. C. Haddon, A. S. Perel, R. C. Morris, T. T. M. Palstra, A. F. Hebard, and R. M. Fleming, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 121 (1995).
-
(1995)
Appl. Phys. Lett.
, vol.67
, pp. 121
-
-
Haddon, R.C.1
Perel, A.S.2
Morris, R.C.3
Palstra, T.T.M.4
Hebard, A.F.5
Fleming, R.M.6
-
12
-
-
15444379839
-
-
note
-
G, which was commonly observed in both cases. Therefore, the discussion in the text was not affected by choice of μ.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
15444366394
-
-
note
-
F are intrinsic carrier density, intrinsic Fermi level, and Fermi level. Since the carrier density changes exponentially with the energy difference between intrinsic Fermi level and Fermi level, the small difference in the band bending would lead to large difference in distribution function of carriers. The band bending depends on dielectric constant of semiconductors.
-
-
-
|