Hydrolytic Reaction by Zinc Finger Mutant Peptides: Successful Redesign of Structural Zinc Sites into Catalytic Zinc Sites

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1708-1713

  Nomura, Akiko ^a   Sugiura, Yukio ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 NITROPHENYL ACETATE; ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; AMINO ACID; CYSTEINYLCYSTEINYLHISTIDYLGLYCINE; CYSTEINYLCYSTEINYLHISTIDYLHISTIDINE; ESTER; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; GLYCYLCYSTEINYLHISTIDYLHISTIDINE; HYDROXIDE; MUTANT PROTEIN; SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER; ZINC; ZINC COMPLEX; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN; ZINC ION;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; PH; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STABILITY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CATALYSIS; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; ZINC; ZINC FINGERS;

EID: 1542317534     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic034931y     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Xing, G.; DeRose, V. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 196-200.
2. Baltzer, L.; Nilsson, J. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12, 355-360.
3. Costanzo, L. D.; Wade, H.; Geremia, S.; Ranbaccio, L.; Pavone, V.; DeGrado, W. F.; Lombardi, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12749-12757.
4. Lombardi, A.; Summa, C. M.; Geremia, S.; Randaccio, L.; Pavone, V.; DeGrado, W. F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 6298-6305.
5. Hellinga, H. W. Fold. Des. 1998, 3, R1-R8.
6. Lu, Y.; Berry, S. M.; Pfister, T. D. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3047-3080.
7. Auld, D. S. BioMetals 2001, 14, 271-313.
8. Klug, A.; Rhodes, D. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1987, 12, 464-469.
9. Payre, F.; Vincent, A. FEBS Lett. 1988, 234, 245-250.
10. Klevit, R. E. Science 1991, 253, 1367-1393.
11. Klug, A. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293, 215-218.
12. Vallee, B. L.; Auld, D. S. Matrix Suppl. 1992, 1, 5-19.
13. Vallee, B. L.; Auld, D. S. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1992, 93, 47-65.
14. Handel, T.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6710-6711.
15. Handel, T. M.; Williams, S. A.; DeGrado, W. F. Science 1993, 261, 879-885.
16. Iverson, B. L.; Iverson, S. A.; Roberts, V. A.; Getzoff, E. D.; Tainer, J. A.; Benkovic, S. J.; Lerner, R. A. Science 1990, 249, 659-662.
17. Wade, W. S.; Koh, J. S.; Han, N.; Hoekstra, D. M.; Lerner, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4449-4456.
18. Müller, H. N.; Skerra, A. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 14126-14135.
19. Regan, L.; Clarke, N. D. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 10878-10883.
20. Klemba, M.; Regan, L. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 10094-10100.
21. Wolfe, S. A.; Nekludova, L.; Pabo, C. O. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2000, 29, 183-212.
22. Junker, M.; Rodgers, K. K.; Coleman, J. E. Inorg. Chem. Acta 1998, 275-276, 481-492.
23. Berg, J. M.; Shi, Y. Science 1996, 271, 1081-1085.
24. Klug, A.; Schwabe, J. W. R. FASEB J. 1995, 9, 597-604.
25. Pavletich, N. P.; Pabo, C. O. Science 1991, 252, 809-817.
26. Lee, M. S.; Gippert, G. P.; Soman, K. V.; Case, D. A.; Wright P. E. Science 1989, 245, 635-637.
27. Nomura, A.; Sugiura, Y. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3693-3698.
28. Koike, T.; Takamura, M.; Kimura, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8443-8449.
29. Jang, B.-B.; Lee, K. P.; Min, D. H.; Suh, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12008-12016.
30. Murakami, Y.; Nakano, A.; Yoshimatsu, A.; Matsumoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2750-2756.
31. -8) for the Zn(II)-peptide complexes.27
32. Merkle, D. L.; Schmidt, M. H.; Berg, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5450-5451.
33. Itoh, T.; Fujii, Y.; Tada, T.; Yoshikawa, Y.; Hisada, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 1265-1274.
34. Hori, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Okuno, Y.; Nagaoka, M.; Futaki, S.; Sugiura, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7648-7653.
35. Although the NMR chemical shifts and NOEs of the histidine imidazole groups suggest three or four histidine imidazole residues in contact with Zn(II), the NMR data provided little information about the Zn(II) coordination geometry. The NMR structure34 was calculated on the basis of the assumption that the zinc was tetrahedrally coordinated as can be seen in the wild type.49 The visible spectra of the corresponding Co(II) complex and the high catalytic activity of the Zn(II) complex strongly suggest a 6-coordination rather than a 4-coordination for the mutant complex Zn(II)-zf(HHHH). In contrast, the wild complex Zn(II)-zf(CCHH) exactly adopts a tetrahedral geometry through two cysteine and two histidene residues, consistent with the spectral data of the Co(II) complex and no catalytic activity of the Zn(II) complex.
36. Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C. Adv. Inorg. Biochem. 1984, 6, 71-111.
37. The d-d bands of Co(II)-zf(HHHH) and the pH dependence of the hydrolytic activity suggest that the zinc center of Zn(II)-zf(HHHH) should adopt a six-coordinate geometry rather than a tetrahedral geometry (Figures 5 and S1), although we have assumed in the previous report that each zinc finger motif of the related three tandem Zn(II)-zf(HHHH) protein has a tetrahedral geometry.34 The three tandem Zn(II)-zf(HHHH) proteins have a high affinity for DNA, despite the structural change of the zinc site from a tetrahedral to a six-coordinate geometry. The three tandem Zn(II)-zf(HHHH) proteins exhibit an α-helix induction upon Zn(II) binding, whose helicity is comparable to the wild type. (The present Zn(II)-zf(HHHH) peptide also induces an α-helix to a similar extent as the wild type.) As well-known, the α-helix region of zinc finger motifs plays a central role in DNA recognition. We think that is the reason the Zn(II)-zf(HHHH) protein retains a high affinity for DNA. The structural change of the zinc center might not significantly decrease the DNA affinity for Zn(II)-zf(HHHH).
38. Lippard, S. J.; Berg, J. M. Principles of Bioinorganic Chemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1994.
39. Budavari, S. The Merck Index, 12th ed.; Merck: Whitehouse Station, NJ, 1996.
40. Eriksson, A. E.; Kylsten, P. M.; Jones, T. A.; Liljas, A. Proteins: Struct., Funct. Genet. 1988, 4, 283-293.
41. Jönsson, B. M.; Håkansson, K.; Liljas, A. FEBS Lett. 1993, 322, 186-190.
42. Pocker, Y.; Deits, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2424-2434.
43. Bicknell, R.; Schäffer, A.; Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C.; Vallee, V. L.; Auld, D. S. Biochemistry 1988, 27, 1050-1057.
44. Zhang, X.; van Eldik, R. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 5606-5614.
45. Kimura, E.; Hashimoto, H.; Koike, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10963-10970.
46. Nakata, K.; Shimomura, N.; Shiina, N.; Izumi, M.; Ichikawa, K.; Shiro, M. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2002, 89, 255-266.
47. m value.
48. Sprinman, E. B.; Angleton, E. L.; Birkedal-Hansen, H.; Van Wart, H. E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 364-368.
49. Narayan, V. A.; Kriwacki, R. W.; Caradonna, J. P. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 7801-7809.
50. Norman, P. R.; Tate, A.; Rich, P. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1988, 145, 211-217.
51. Koike, T.; Kajitani, S.; Nakamura, I.; Kimura, E.; Shiro, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 1210-1219.
52. Zhu, S.; Chen, W.; Lin, H.; Yin, X.; Kou, F.; Lin, M.; Chen, Y. Polyhedron 1997, 19, 3285-3291.