An EPR, ESEEM, Structural NMR, and DFT Study of a Synthetic Model for the Covalently Ring-Linked Tyrosine-Histidine Structure in the Heme-Copper Oxidases

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 2328-2338

  Kim, Sun Hee ^a   Aznar, Constantino ^a   Brynda, Marcin ^a   Silks, Louis A ^b   Michalczyk, Ryszard ^b   Unkefer, Clifford J ^b   Woodruff, William H ^c   Britt, R David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; ELECTRONS; ENZYMES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE; PHENOLS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS;

HYPERFINE COUPLINGS; MOIETY;

COPPER OXIDES;

4 METHYL 2 (4 METHYLIMIDAZOL 1 YL)PHENOL; COPPER; HEME; HEME COPPER OXIDASE; HISTIDINE; IMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; NITROGEN 15; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PHENOL DERIVATIVE; RADICAL; TYROSINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COVALENT BOND; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HEME; HISTIDINE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; OXIDOREDUCTASES; TYROSINE;

EID: 1542306951     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0303743     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. (a) Ferguson-Miller, S.; Babcock, G. T. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2889-2907.
2. (b) Malstrom, B. G. J. Bioinorg. Chem. 1998, 3, 339-343.
3. Tsukihara, T.; Aoyama, H.; Yamashita, E.; Tomizaki, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Shinzawa-Itoh, K.; Nakashima, R.; Yaono, R.; Yoshikawa, S. Science 1995, 269, 1069-1074.
4. Ostermeier, C.; Harrenga, A.; Ermler, U.; Michel, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 10547-10553.
5. Yoshikawa, S.; Shinzawa-Itoh, K.; Nakashima, R.; Yaono, R.; Yamashita, E.; Inpue, N.; Yao, M.; Fei, M. J.; Libeu, C. P.; Mizushima, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Tomozaki, T.; Tsukihara, T. Science 1998, 280, 1723-1729.
6. Svensson-Ek, M.; Abramson, J.; Larsson, G.; Tornroth, S.; Brzezinski, P. ; Iwata, S. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 321, 329-339.
7. Proshlyakov, D. A.; Pressler, M. A.; Babcock, G. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 8020-8025.
8. Gennis, R. B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1365, 241-248.
9. Michel, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 12819-12824.
10. Fabian, M.; Palmer, G. Biochemistry 1995, 34, 13802-13810.
11. MacMillan, F.; Kannt, A.; Behr, J.; Prisner, T.; Michel, H. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 9179-9184.
12. Rigby, S. E.; Junemann, S.; Rich, P. R.; Heathcote, P. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 5921-5928.
13. Proshlakov, D. A.; Pressler, M. A.; Demaso, A.; Leykam, J. F.; DeWitt, D. L.; Babcock, G. T. Science 2000, 290, 1588-1591.
14. Tomson, F.; Bailey, J. A.; Gennis, R. B.; Unkefer, C. J.; Li, Z. H.; Silks, L. A.; Martinez, R. A.; Donohoe, R. J.; Dyer, R. B.; Woodruff, W. H. Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 14383-14390.
15. Silks, L. A.; Dunkle, E.; Unkefer, C. J.; Sudmeier, J. L.; Butler, M.; Bachovchin, W. W. J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 1995, 36, 947-951.
16. Sturgeon, B. E.; Britt, R. D. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1992, 63, 2187-2192.
17. Mims, W. B. J. Magn. Reson. 1984, 59, 291-306.
18. Brok, M.; Babcock, G. T.; De Groot, A.; Hoff, A. J. J. Magn. Reson. 1986, 70, 368-378
19. Britt, R. D.; Zimmermann, J.-L.; Sauer, K.; Klein, M. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3522-3532.
20. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomeli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ciolowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Reploge, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.7; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
21. Flukiger, P.; Luthi, H. P.; Portmann, S.; Weber, J. MOLEKEL 4.3; Swiss Center for Scientific Computing: Manno (Switzerland), 2000-2002.
22. Barone, V. Theor. Chim. Acta 1995, 91, 113-128.
23. Torrent, M.; Musaev, D. G.; Morokuma, K. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8618-8627.
24. McCauley, K. M.; Vrtis, J. M.; Dupont, J.; van der Donk W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2403-2404.
25. Cappuccio, J. A.; Ayala, I.; Elliott, G. I.; Szundi, I.; Lewis, J.; Konopeiski, J. P.; Barry, B. A.; Einarsdottir, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1750-1760.
26. Recently van der Donk and co-workers23 reported the EPR signal of the 2-imidazole-1-yl-4-methylphenol radical. The overall line width and line shape of the EPR signal we observed here are similar to those reported. However, the EPR spectrum reported here differs from a very recent result by Cappuccio et al.24 of the radical form of a cross-linked histidine-phenol due to the absence of methyl protons of the compound.
27. Sornes, A. R.; Benetis, N. P.; Erickson, R.; Mahgoub, A. S.; Eberson, L. ; Lund, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 8987-8994.
28. Modulation from weakly coupled protons is suppressed by our selection of a τ value that is a multiple of the proton Larmor frequency.
29. (a) Lai, A.; Flanagan, H. L.; Singel, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 7161-7166.
30. (b) Flanagan, H. L.; Singel, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 5606-5616.
31. We note here that weakly coupled nitrogen nuclei from proximal solute molecules are unlikely to contribute to ESEEM spectra, since, at a 10 mM concentration, approximately 0.0005 other solute molecules would be located within a distance of 6 Å or less, which is a good estimate of detectable distance for weakly coupled nitrogens in ESEEM experiments. Therefore, we can rule out detection of intermolecular nitrogen couplings.
32. (a) Mims, W. B. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 5, 2409-2419.
33. (b) Dikanov, S. A.; Shubin, A. A.; Parmon, V. N. J. Magn. Reson. 1981, 42, 474-487.
34. Dikanov, S. A.; Bowman, M. K. J. Magn. Reson., Ser. A 1995, 116, 125-128.
35. Arbuznikov, A. V.; Kaupp, M.; Malkin, V. G.; Reviakine, R.; Malkina, O. L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 22, 5467-5474.
36. Mattar, S. M.; Emwas A. H.; Stephens, A. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 363, 152-160.
37. Heberle, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 8715-8720.
38. Himo, F.; Eriksson, L. A.; Blomberg, R. A.; Siegbahn, P. E. M. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2000, 76, 714-723.
39. Ashby, C. I. H.; Cheng, C. P.; Brown, T. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 6057-6063.
40. 2qQ and ε differ by less than 2% from the values calculated for the pseudo-trans rotamer of RS.
41. Harwell, C. R.; Mrse. A. A.; Shelby, A. I.; Butler, L. G.; Hall, R. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 8088-8092.