Reconfiguring control in library collection development: A conceptual framework for assessing the shift toward electronic collections

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 312-325

  Covi, Lisa M ^a   Cragin, Melissa H ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION MAKING; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; INFORMATION SERVICES; PLANNING;

ELECTRONIC COLLECTIONS; ELECTRONIC MATERIALS; LIBRARY COLLECTION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 1542305680     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10375     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Library Association. (1993). The relevance of collection development policies: Definition, necessity, and applications. RQ, 33(1), 65-74.
2. Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2000). Aggregation and disaggregation of information goods: Implications for bundling, site licensing, and micro-payment systems. In B. Kahin & H.R. Varian (Eds.), Internet publishing and beyond: The economics of digital information and intellectual property (pp. 114-137). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bates, M.J. (1996). Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Library Trends, 45(2), 155-164.
4. Bell, S.J. (2001). The new digital divide: Dissecting aggregator exclusivity deals. D-lib Magazine, 7(7/8).
5. Billings, H. (1996). Library collections and distance information: New models of collection development for the 21st century. Journal of Library Administration, 24(1/2), 3-17.
6. Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Brooks, S., & Dorst, T.J. (2002). Issues facing academic library consortia and perceptions of members of the Illinois Digital Academic Library. Portal, 2(1), 43-57.
8. Buckland, M.K. (1989). Roles of collections. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 213-226.
9. Case, M. (2002, April 2). Increasing access to research: The role of SPARC, faculty and Libraries. Presentation at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
10. Christensen, C.M. (2000). The innovator's dilemma: The revolutionary national bestseller that changed the way we do business. New York: Harper Collins. Publishers, Inc.
11. Covi, L.M., & Kling, R. (1998). Shift or drift? The transitions from paper to digital libraries. In M.T. Wolf, P. Ensor, & M.A. Thomas (Eds.), Information imagineering: Meeting at the interface (pp. 109-117). Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
12. Holleman, C. (2000). Electronic resources: Are basic criteria for the selection of materials changing? Library Trends, 48(4). 694-710.
13. International Coalition of Library Consortia. (1998). Guidelines for statistical measures of usage of Web-based indexed, abstracted, and full text resources. Retrieved June 13, 2002, from http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/webstats.html
14. Jaguszewski, J.M., & Probst, L.K. (2000). The impact on electronic resources on serials cancellation and remote storage decisions in academic research libraries. Library Trends, 48(4), 799-820.
15. Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16(3), 217-232.
16. Krumenaker, L. (2001). A tempest in a librarian's teapot: EBSCO, Pro-Quest, Gale Exclusive, and unique titles. Searcher, 9(7), 40-45.
17. Lee, H.-L. (2000). What is a collection? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(12), 1106-1113.
18. MacKie-Mason, J.K., Riveros, J.F., Bonn, M.S., & Lougee, W.P. (1999). A report on the PEAK epxeriment: Usage and economic behavior. D-Lib Magazine, 5(7/8). Retrieved November 4, 2003, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july99/mackie-mason/07mackie-mason.html
19. MacKie-Mason, J.K., & Riveros, J.F. (1997). Economics and electronic access to scholarly information. Retrieved October 13, 2000, from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jimm/papers/peak-harvard97/
20. Manoff, M. (1997, March). Cyberhope or cyberhype? Computers and scholarly research. Paper presented at The Conference on Scholarly Communication in the Next Millennium, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC. Retrieved November 4, 2003, from http://web.mit.edu/mmanoff/Public/manoff.html
21. Metz, P. (2000). Principles of selection for electronic resources. Library Trends, 48(4), 771-728.
22. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Miller, R.H. (2000). Electronic resources and academic libraries, 1980-2000: A historical perspective. Library Trends, 48(4), 645-670.
24. Moyo, L.M. (2002). Collections on the Web: Some access and navigation issues. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 26(1), 47-59.
25. Mueller, M., & Schement, J.R. (1996). Universal service from the bottom up: A study of telephone penetration in Camden, New Jersey. The Information Society, 12(3), 273-292.
26. National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Preparing for the revolution: Information technology and the future of the research university. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Odlyzko, A. (1997). The Economics of electronic journals. FirstMonday, 2(8). Retrieved November 4, 2003, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue2_8/odlyzko/index.html
28. Packer, D. (2001). Acquisitions allocations: Fairness, equity and bundled pricing. Portal, 1(3), 209-224.
29. Palmer, C.L. (1996). Information work at the boundaries of science: Linking library services to research pratices. Library Trends, 45(2), 165-91.
30. Shim, W.J. (2000, December). ARL E-Metrics: Phase one update. Paper presented at the CNI Fall 2000 Task Force Meeting, San Antonio, TX. Retrieved November 4, 2003, from http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/slides/cni2000_shim_files/frame.htm
31. Tenopir, C., & King, D.W. (1998). Designing electronic journals with 30 years of lessons from print. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(2). Retrieved March 19, 2001, from http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/king.html
32. Thompson, K., Wilder, R., & Button, L.H. (2000). Impact of bundled databases on serials acquisitions in academic libraries. Serials Librarian, 38(3/4), 213-218.
33. Thornton, G.A. (2000). Impact of electronic resources on collection development, the roles of librarians, and library consortia. Library Trends, 48(4), 842-856.
34. Virtual Reference Desk Project. (2003). Facets of quality for digital reference services. Retrieved November 4, 2003, from http://vrd.org/facets-06-03.shtml