Genomic Background Drives the Divergence of Duplicated Amylase Genes at Synonymous Sites in Drosophila

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 222-227

  Zhang, Ze ^a,b   Kishino, Hirohisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Amylase; Drosophila; Duplicated genes; Evolutionary fate; Genomic background

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; AMYLASE ISOENZYME; CYTOSINE; GUANINE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME ARM; CODON; DNA FLANKING REGION; DROSOPHILA; GENE CLUSTER; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR CLOCK; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

3' FLANKING REGION; AMYLASES; ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; CHROMOSOMES; CODON; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; ISOENZYMES; MUTATION; PHYLOGENY; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

ARACHNIDA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 1542286780     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg243     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akashi H. 1995. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139:1067-1076.
2. Ashburner, M. D. 1989. Drosophila. A laboratory handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
3. Betran, E., K. Thornton, and M. Long. 2002. Retroposed new genes out of the X in Drosophila. Genome Res. 12: 1854-1859.
4. Boutanaev, A. M., A. I. Kalmykova, Y. Y. Sheveiyov, and D. I. Nurminsky. 2002. Large clusters of co-expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. Nature 420:666-669.
5. Brown, C. J., C. F. Aquadro, and W. W. Anderson. 1990. DNA sequence evolution of the amylase multigene family in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 126:131-138.
6. Da Lage, J.-L., F. Maczkowoak, and M.-L. Carious. 2000. Molecular characterization and evolution of the amylase multigene family of Drosophila ananassae. J. Mol. Evol. 51:391-403.
7. Force, A., M. Lynch, B. Pickett, A. Amores, Y.-L. Yan et al. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531-1545.
8. Grauer, D., and W.-H. Li. 1999. Fundamentals of molecular evolution, 2nd Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
9. Hill, W. G., and A. Robertson. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8:269-294.
10. Hey, J., and R. M. Kliman. 2002. Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila. Genetics 160:595-608.
11. Inomata, N., H. Tachida, and T. Yamazaki. 1997. Molecular evolution of the Amy multigenes in the subgenus Sophophora of Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:942-950.
12. Inomata, N., and T. Yamazaki. 2000. Evolution of nucleotide substitutions and gene regulation in the amylase multigenes in Drosophila kikkawai and its sibling species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:601-615.
13. Kondrashov, F. A., I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin. 2002. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol. 3:research 0008.1-0008.9.
14. Kramer, J. A., J. R. McCarrey, D. Djakiew, and S. A. Krawetz. 1998. Differentiation: the selective potentiation of chromatin domains. Development 125:4749-4755.
15. Li, P., and J. Bousquet. 1992. Relative-rate test for nucleotide substitutions between two lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1185-1189.
16. Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
17. Mount, S. M., C. Burks, G. Hertz, G. D. Stormo, O. White, and C. Fields. 1992. Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:4255-4262.
18. Munte, A., M. Aguade, and C. Segarra. 2001. Changes in the recombinational environment affect divergence in the yellow gene of Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1045-1056.
19. Muse, S. V., and B. S. Gaut. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:715-724.
20. Muse, S. V., and S. K. Pood. 2000. Hy-Phy user manual. North Carolina State University, Raleigh; University of Arizona, Tucson.
21. Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
22. Robinson-Rechavi, M., and D. Huchon. 2000. RRTree: relative-rate tests between groups of sequences on a phylogenetic tree. Bioinformatics 16:296-297.
23. Rubin, G. M., M. D. Yandell, J. R. Wortman et al. (50 coauthors). 2000. Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science 287:2204-2215.
24. Shields, D. C., P. M. Sharp, D. G. Higgins, and F. Wright. 1988. "Silent" sites in Drosophila genes are not neutral: evidence of selection among synonymous codons. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:704-716.
25. Steinemann, S., and M. Steinemann. 1999. The amylase gene cluster on the evolving sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda. Genetics 151:151-161.
26. Stephan, W., and C. H. Langley. 1989. Molecular genetic variation in the centromeric region of the X chromosome in three Drosophila ananassae populations. 1. Contrasts between the vermilion and forked loci. Genetics 121:89-99.
27. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
28. Takano-Shimizu, T. 1999. Local recombination and mutation effects on molecular evolution. Genetics 153:1285-1296.
29. Takano-Shimizu, T. 2001. Local changes in GC/AT substitution biases and in crossover frequencies on Drosophila chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:606-619.
30. Thornton, K., and M. Long. 2002. Rapid divergence of gene duplicates on the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:918-925.
31. Wolfe, K. H., P. M. Sharp, and W.-H. Li. 1989. Mutation rates differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature 337:283-285.
32. Zeng, L.-W., J. M. Comeron, B. Chen, and M. Kreitman. 1998. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila. Genetica 102/103:369-382.
33. Zhang, Z., N. Inomata, T. Ohba, M.-L. Cariou, and T. Yamazaki. 2002. Codon bias differentiates between the duplicated amylase Loci following gene duplication in Drosophila. Genetics 161:1187-1196.