Dye-bias correction in dual-labeled cDNA microarrays gene expression measurements

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 480-487

  Rosenzweig, Barry A ^a   Pine, P Scott ^a   Domon, Olen E ^b   Morris, Suzanne M ^b   Chen, James J ^b   Sistare, Frank D ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

cDNA; Dye bias; Dye swap; Genomics; Microarrays

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT DYE; REAGENT;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 1542271926     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6694     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Akerman GS, Rosenzweig BA, Domon OE, McGarrity LJ, Blankenship LR, Tsai CA, et al. In press. Gene expression profiles and genetic damage in benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-exposed TK6 cells. Mutat Res.
2. Cleveland WS, Grosse E, Shyu WM. 1992. Local regression models. In: Statistical Models in S. (Chambers JM, Hastie TJ, eds). Pacific Grove, CA:WAdsworth & Brooks/Cole. 309-376.
3. Dobbin K, Shih JH, Simon R. 2003. Statistical design of reverse dye microarrays. Bioinformatics 19:803-810.
4. Goryachev AB, Macgregor PF, Edwards AM. 2001. Unfolding of microarray data. J Comput Biol 8:443-461.
5. Ideker T, Thorsson V, Siegel AF, Hood LE. 2000. Testing for differentially-expressed genes by maximum-likelihood analysis of microarray data. J Comput Biol 7:805-817.
6. Kerr MK, Martin M, Churchill GA. 2001. Analysis of variance for gene expression microarray data. J Comput Biol 7:819-837.
7. Qiagen, Inc. 1999. RNeasy Midi/Maxi Handbook. Valencia, CA:QIagen, Inc.
8. Quackenbush J. 2002, Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 32(suppl):496-501.
9. Tseng GC, Oh M, Rohlin L, Liao J, Wong WH. 2001. Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: Quality filtering, channel normalization, Models of variations and assessment of gene effects. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2549-2557.
10. Wang X, Ghosh S, Guo S. 2001. Quantitative quality control in microarray image processing and data acquisition, Nucleic Acids Res 29:E75.
11. Wolfinger RD, Gibson G, Wolfinger ED, Bennett L, Hamadeh H, Bushel P, et al. 2001. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. J Comput Biol 8:625-637.
12. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, et al. 2002. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: A robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 30:E15.
13. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Speed TP. 2001. Normalization for cDNA microarray data. In: Microarrays: Optical Technologies and Informatics (Bittner ML, Chen Y, Dorsel AN, Dougherty ER, eds). Vol 4266. Proceedings of SPIE.
14. Zhou Y, Gwadry FG, Reinhold WC, Miller LD, Smith LH, Scherf U, et al. 2002. Transcriptional regulation of mitotic genes by camptothecin-induced DNA damage: Microarray analysis of dose- and time-dependent effects. Cancer Res 62:1688-1695.