Crème de la crème in forensic science and legal medicine: The most highly cited articles, authors and journals 1981-2003

International Journal of Legal Medicine

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 59-65

  Jones, Alan Wayne ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Citations; Forensic science; Impact factors; Journals; Legal medicine

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; DATA BASE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

BIBLIOMETRICS; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; FORENSIC SCIENCES; PERIODICALS; RESEARCH;

EID: 15244361284     PISSN: 09379827     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-004-0512-x     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Horton R (1998) A fair reward. Lancet 352:892
2. Adam D (2002) The counting house. Nature 415:726-729
3. Garfield E (1979) Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 227:669-671
4. Garfield E (1979) Citation indexing, its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. ISI Press, Philadelphia
5. Cronin B (1984) The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. Taylor Graham, London
6. Jones AW (1998) Some thoughts and reflections on authorship. Alcohol Alcohol 31:11-15
7. Grinnell F (1992) The scientific attitude. Guilford Press, London, New York
8. Sindermann CJ (2001) Winning the games scientists play. Perseus, Cambridge MA
9. Jones AH, McLellan F (eds) (2000) Ethical issues in biomedical publication. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
10. Williams G (1998) Misleading, unscientific and unjust: the United Kingdoms research assessment exercise. BMJ 316: 1079-1082
11. Reynolds TM, Wierzbicki AS (2004) Does activity in research correlate with visibility? J Clin Pathol 57:426-427
12. King J (1987) A review of bibliometrics and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. J Inform Sci 13:261-276
13. King DA (2004) The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430:311-316
14. Lawrence PA (2003) The politics of publication. Nature 422:259-260
15. Wu R (2004) Making an impact. Nature 428:206-207
16. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR (1989) Citation analysis and the science policy arena. Trends Biochem Sci 14:8-12
17. Garfield E (1998) How can impact factors be improved. BMJ 313:411-413
18. Seglen PO (1997) Citation and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52:1050-1056
19. Opthof T (2001) Sense and nonsense about impact factors. Cardiovasc Res 33:1-7
20. Jones AW (2003) Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals - what do the numbers really mean? Forensic Sci Int 133:1-8
21. Garfield E (1964) Science citation index, a new dimension in indexing. Science 144:649-654
22. Garfield E (1987) 100 Citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 257:52-59
23. Terajima K, Åneman A (2003) Citation classics in anaesthesia and pain journals: a literature review in the era of the internet. Acta Anaesthsiol Scand 47:655-663
24. Cronin B, Atkins HB (2000) The web of knowledge - A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph series, Information Today Inc., Medford
25. Cole S (1989) Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends Biochem Sci 14:9-13
26. Hamilton DP (1990) Publishing by and for the numbers. Science 250:1131-1132
27. Foster KR, Huber PW (1999) Judging science; scientific knowledge and the federal courts. MIT Press, Cambridge
28. Hamilton DP (1991) Research papers: who's uncited now? Science 251:25
29. Garfield E (1996) When to cite. Library Q 66:449-458
30. Jones AW (1995) Evaluating the work of forensic scientists by citation analysis. J Forensic Sci 40:529-530
31. Jones AW (1998) Citation trends and practices in the Journal of Forensic Sciences as documented by ISI's journal citation report. J Forensic Sci 43:439-444