Citation classics in anaesthesia and pain journals: A literature review in the era of the internet

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 655-663

  Terajima, K ^a   Åneman, Anders ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anaesthesiology; Bibliometrics; Pain; Publications

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; CLASSIFICATION; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NORTH AMERICA; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; SCISEARCH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; INTERNET; PAIN; PUBLISHING;

EID: 0038545449     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00137.x     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA 1987; 257: 52-9.
2. Picknett T, Davis K. The 100 most-cited articles from JMB. J Mol Biol 1999: 293: 171-6.
3. Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 2002: 26: 1099-105.
4. Greene NM. Anesthesiology journals, 1992. Anesth Analg 1992: 74: 116-20.
5. Pomaroli A, Hauffe H, Benzer A. Who publishes in the large anaesthesia journals? Br J Anaesth 1994: 72: 723-5.
6. Boldt J, Maleck W, Koetter KP. Which countries publish in important anesthesia and critical care journals? Anesth Analg 1999: 88: 1175-80.
7. Brambrink AM, Ehrler D, Dick WF. Publications on paediatric anaesthesia: a quantitative analysis of publication activity and international recognition. Br J Anaesth 2000: 85: 556-62.
8. Science Citation Index (SCI®). Journal Citation Reports. A. Bibliometric Analysis of Science Journals in the ISI® Database. ISI . Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
9. Hansson S. Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals. Lancet 1995: 346: 1301.
10. Seglen PO. Why the impact of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997: 314: 497-502.
11. Smith G. Impact factors in anaesthesia journals. Br J Anaesth 1996: 76: 753-4.
12. Gisvold SE. Citation analysis and journal impact factors - is the tail wagging the dog? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999: 43: 971-3.
13. Seglen PO. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1994: 45: 1-11.
14. Fassoulaki A, Papilas K, Paraskeva A, Patris K. Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002: 46: 902-5.
15. Fassoulaki A, Paraskeva A, Papilas K, Karabinis G. Self-citation in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. Br J Anaesth 2000: 84: 266-9.
16. Stossel TP, Stossel SC. Declining American representation in leading clinical-research journals. N Engl J Med 1990: 322: 739-42.
17. Link AM. US and non-US submissions. JAMA 1998: 280: 246-7.
18. Fassoulaki A, Sarantopoulos C, Papilas K, Paths K, Melemeni A. Academic anesthesiologists' views on the importance of the impact factor of scientific journals, a North American and European survey. Can J Anesth 2001: 48: 953-7.
19. Garfield E. Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? BMJ 1996: 313: 411-3.