Does activity in research correlate with visibility?

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 426-427

  Reynolds, T M ^a,c   Wierzbicki, A S ^b  

^a Centre for Cutaneous Research   (United Kingdom)

^b ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION;

AUTHORSHIP; BIBLIOMETRICS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDLINE; PATHOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESEARCH SUPPORT;

EID: 1842611500     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2003.012351     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Wierzbicki AS, Reynolds TM. Total research productivity in a pathology discipline. J Clin Pathol 2002;55:495-8.
2. Armstrong PW, Caverson MM, Adams L, et al. Evaluation of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Research Scholarship Program: research productivity and impact. Can J Cardiol 1997;13:507-16.
3. Barabasi A-L, Bonabeau E. Scale-free networks. Sci Am 2003;5:51-6.
4. Callahan M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed Journals. JAMA 2002;287:2847-50.
5. Jones AW. Impact factors of forensic science and toxicology journals: what do the numbers really mean? Forensic Sci Int 2003;133:1-8.
6. Walter G, Bloch S, Hunt G, et al. Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality. Med J Aust 2003;178:280-1.
7. Lundberg G. The "omnipotent" science citation index impact factor. Med J Aust 2003;178:253-4.