Development of the Finnish agri-environmental policy as a learning process

European Environment

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 13-26

  Kröger, Laura ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Advocacy Coalition Framework; Agri environmental policy; Nitrates Directive; Policy learning; Water Framework Directive

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLICY MAKING;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

EID: 15244360743     PISSN: 09610405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eet.370     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aakkula J. 1991. Yhteinen Valinta Maatalouspolitiikassa, MTTL, Tiedonantoja 164. Finland.
2. Bennett C, Howlett M. 1992. The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences 25: 275-294.
3. Busenberg G. 2001. Learning in organisations and public policy. Journal of Public Policy 21(2): 173-189.
4. Council of European Communities (CEC). 1991. Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources. Official Journal L375/1.
5. Council of European Communities (CEC). 1992. Council Regulation No 2078/ 92 on the Introduction and Maintenance of Agricultural Production Methods Compatible with the Requirements of the Protection of the Environment and the Management of the Countryside. Official Journal L215.
6. Council of European Communities (CEC). 1991. Council Regulation No 1257/ 99 on Support for Rural Development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and Amending and Repealing Certain Regulations. Official Journal L160.
7. Council of European Communities (CEC). 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Official Journal L327/1.
8. Eising R. 2002. Policy learning in embedded negotiations: explaining EU electricity liberalization. International Organization 56 1): 85-120.
9. Elliott C, Schlaepfer R. 2001. Understanding forest certification using the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Forest Policy and Economics 2 257-266.
10. Etheredge L. 1981. Government learning. In The Handbook of Political Behaviour Vol 2, Long S (ed.). Pergamon: New York; 73-161.
11. European Commission (EC). 1985. Perspective for the Common Agricultural Policy - the Green Paper of the Commission, Green Europe news flash, Brussels.
12. European Commission (EC). 2002. Implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Waters Against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources, synthesis from year 2000 member states reports. Luxembourg.
13. Fairley R, Smith C, van Gleen H, Hoedl-Adick M, van Thuyne G, De Roover D. 2002. Riding the new wave of European water law: how member states are tackling the Water Framework Directive. European Environmental Law Review August/ September: 232-239.
14. Fiorino D. 2001. Environmental policy as learning: a new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review 61(3): 322-334.
15. Flynn B, Kröger L. 2003. Can policy learning really improve implementation? Evidence from Irish responses to the Water Framework Directive. The Journal of European Environmental Policy 13 3): 150-163.
16. Glasbergen P. 1996. Learning to manage the environment. In Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects, Lafferty W, Meadowcroft J (eds). Elgar: Cheltenham; 175-193
17. Goodchild R. 1998. EU Policies for the reduction of nitrogen in water: the example of the Nitrates Directive. Environmental Pollution 102(51):737-740.
18. Greenaway J, Smith S, Street J. 1991. Deciding Factors in British Politics: a Case Studies Approach. Routledge: London.
19. Haas E. 1990. When Knowledge is Power. Three Models of Change in International Organisations. University of California Press: Berkley, CA.
20. Hall P. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. Comparative Politics April: 275-296.
21. Heclo H. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
22. Heinz, I. 2001. Voluntary and compulsory measures to implement more sustainable agriculture in water catchment areas. In Agricultural Use of Groundwater - Towards Integration Between Agricultural Policy and Water Resources Management, Dosi C (ed.). Kluwer: Dordrecht; 157-167.
23. Jenkins-Smith H, Sabatier P. 1994. Evaluating the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Journal of Public Policy 14: 175-203.
24. Jokinen P. 1995. Tuotannon Muutokset ja Ympäristö politiikka, Ympäristösosiologinen tutkimus suomalaisesta maatalouden ympäristöpolitiikasta vuosina 1970-1994. Turun yliopisto. Julkaisuja C No: 116.
25. Jokinen P. 2000. Europeanisation and ecological modernisation: agri-environmental policy and practices in Finland. Environmental Politics 9(1): 138-167
26. Jordan A, Greenway J. 1998. Green Challenges to Policy Networks: British Costal Water Policy, 1955-1995, conference proceedings, Political Studies Association. http://www.psa.ac.uk/cps/1998/jordan.pdf [15 July 2004}.
27. Kaika M, Page B. 2002. The Making of the EU Water Framework Directive: Shifting Choreographies of Governance and the Effectiveness of Environmental Lobbying, working paper of the School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University.
28. Kaljonen, M. 2003. Ympäristöpolitiikkaa pellon laidalla. Tapaustutkimus suojavyöhykesuunnittelun käytännö istä. Alue Ympäristö 2/2003.
29. Kallis G, Butler D. 2001. The EU water framework directive: measures and implications. Water Policy 3(2): 125-142.
30. Kettunen L. 1992. Suomen Maatalouspolitiikka, MTTL, Tiedonantoja 185. Finland.
31. Kiijärvi S. 2002. Paljon Melua Naturasta. MTK. n Rooli Natura 2000 - Konftiktissa, publications in sociology, University of Jyväskylä, 69/2002. Finland.
32. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF). 1994. Ehdotus Maatalouden Ympäristötukiohjelmaksi [Proposal for the Finnish Agri-Environmental Programme], Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 19/1994, Helsinki.
33. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF). 1999. Ehdotus Maatalouden Ympäristöohjelmaksi 2000-2006 [Proposal for Finnish Agri-Environmental Programme 2000-2006], Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 13/1999, Helsinki.
34. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF). 2004. Horisontaalisen Maaseudun Kehittämisohjelman Väliarviointi [Mid-Term Evaluation of the Horizontal Rural Development Programme], Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 1/2004, Helsinki.
35. Ministry of the Environment (ME). 1992. Maaseudun Ympäristöohjelma [Rural Environmental Programme], Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki.
36. Ministry of the Environment (ME). 1997. Nitraattidirektiivityöryhmän Mietintö [Memo of the Nitrate Directive Committee], Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki.
37. Mintrom M, Vergari S. 1996. Advocacy coalitions, policy entrepreneurs and policy change. Policy Studies Journal 24: 420-434.
38. Moss T. 2004. The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Policy 21: 85-94
39. Niemi-Iitalahti A, Vilkki B. 1995. Organisaatioiden Vuorovaikutus Ympäristöpolitiikan Toimeenpanossa, Vaasan yliopiston julkaisuja. Tutkimuksia 195.
40. Parsons W. 1995. Public Policy. An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Elgar: Cheltenham.
41. Peffley M, Hurwitz J. 1985. A hierarchical model of attitude constraint. American Journal of Political Science 29(4): 871-890.
42. Peterson J. 1995. Decision-making in the European Union: towards a framework of analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 2 March): 69-93.
43. Rekolainen S, Kauppi L, Turtola E. 1992. Maatalous ja Vesien Tila, Luonnonvarainneuvosto, maa-ja metsätalousministeriö. Luonnonvarainjulkaisuja 15. Helsinki.
44. Rose R. 1991. What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy 2(1): 3-33.
45. Sabatier P. 1986. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy 6(1): 21-48.
46. Sabatier P. 1998. The Advocacy Coalition Framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 5 1): 98-130.
47. Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H (eds). 1993. Policy Change and Learning. An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Westview: Boulder, CO.
48. Sacks P. 1980. State structure and the asymmetrical society. Comparative Politics 12.
49. Sanderson I. 2002. Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration 80(1): 1-22.
50. Thomas G. 1999. External shocks, conflict and learning as interactive sources of change in U.S. security policy. Journal of Public Policy 19(2): 209-231.
51. Valve H. 1995. Maatalouspolitiikan Suunnittelukäytännö t ja Ympäristövaikutusten Arvioinnin Kehittäminen, Vesi-ja ympäristöhallitus - sarja A 213.
52. Vihinen H. 1990. Suomalaisen Rakennemuutoksen Maatalouspolitiikka 1958-1987, Julkaisuja 8, Helsingin yliopisto, Maaseudun tutkimus-ja koulutuskeskus, Mikkeli.
53. Weber N, Christophersen T. 2002. The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European policy process. Forest Policy and Economics 4: 1-12.
54. Wilson C. 2000. Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy 30(3): 247-274.
55. Yliskylä-Peuralahti, J. 2003. Biodiversity - a new spatial challenge for Finnish Agri-environmental policies? Journal of Rural Studies 19: 215-231.