Biodiversity - A new spatial challenge for Finnish agri-environmental policies?

Journal of Rural Studies

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 215-231

  Yliskylä Peuralahti, Johanna ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Agri environmental policies; Agri environmental scheme; Biodiversity; Finland; Rural landscapes

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING;

FINLAND;

EID: 0037376677     PISSN: 07430167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00070-0     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Braun, B., Castree, N. (Eds.), 1998. Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium. Routledge, London.
2. Buller, H., 2001. Where the wild things are: reflexions on the evolving iconography of rural fauna. Paper Presented at the 19th European Congress for Rural Sociology. Dijon, France, September 2001.
3. Cobb, D., Dolman, P., O'Riordan, T., 1999. Interpretations of sustainable agriculture in the UK. Progress in Human Geography 23, 209-235.
4. Duncan, J., 1993. Representing power: the politics and poetics of urban form in the Kandyan Kingdom. In Duncan, J., Ley D. (Eds.), Place, Culture, Representation, Routledge, London & New York, pp. 232-248.
5. Finnish Agriculture and Rural Industries, 2001. Agricultural Economics Research Institute. Publications 97a.
6. Fitzsimmons, M., Goodman, D., 1998. Incorporating nature: environmental narratives and the reproduction of food. In Braun, B., Castree N. (Eds.), Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium. Routledge, London, pp. 194-220.
7. Gray, J., 2000. The common agricultural policy and the re-invention of the rural in the European community. Sociologia Ruralis 40(1), 30-52.
8. Haila, Y., Levins, R., 1992. Ekologian ulottuvuudet (Published in English with the name Humanity and Nature: Ecology, Science and Society). Vastapaino, Tampere.
9. Hajer, M.A., 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10. Healey, P., 1997. Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Macmillan, London.
11. Heikkil, T., 2000. Suomalainen kulttuurimaisema (Finnish Cultural Landscape). Tammi, Helsinki.
12. Häkli , J., 1994. Maakunta, tieto ja valta. Tutkimus poliittis- hallinnollisen maakuntadiskurssin ja sen historiallisten edellytysten muotoutumisesta Suomessa (Region, knowledge and power- The emergence of and historical preconditions for the politico-administrative discource on provinces in Finland). Acta Universitatis Tamperensis A 415. University of Tampere, Tampere.
13. Jokinen, P. (2002) The European Union as a suprastate in agri-environmental issues: the Finnish perspective. In: Mol, A.P.J., Buttel, F.H. (Eds.), The Environmental State Under Pressure 10, 105-120.
14. Jokinen, A., Juhila, K., Suominen, E., 1993. Diskurssianalyysin aakkoset (The alphabets of discourse analysis). Vastapaino, Tampere.
15. Jordan, A., Ward, N., Buller, H., 1998. Surf, sea, sand and sewage: implementing European bathing water policy in the United Kingdom and France. Environment and Planning A 30, 1389-1408.
16. Kaljonen, M., 2001. The role of different forms of knowledge in the implementation of agri-environmental policy. Paper Presented at the 19th European Congress for Rural Sociology, Dijon France, September 2001.
17. Katila, S., 2000. Moraalijärjestyksen rajaama tila. Maanviljelijä-yrittäjäperheiden selviytymisstrategiat (Framed by moral order: the survival strategies of farm-family businesses). Acta Universitatis Oeconomicae Helsingiensis A 174.
18. Kuhmonen, T., 1998. Agenda 2007-Suomen maatalouden EU-historia ja-tulevaisuus. Fin-Aguuri Oy. Maaseudun tulevaisuusselvityksiä 4.
19. Kumpulainen, M., 1999. Maan ja talouden välissä. Viisi kertomusta suomalaisen maatilan luontosuhteen muutoksista (Land versus agrobusiness. Five narrations on the changes in the nature relations of Finnish farms). Joensuun yliopisto. Maantieteen laitos. Julkaisuja 5.
20. Lefebvre, H., 1991. The production of space. Blackwell, Oxford.
21. Liggett, H., 1995. City sights/sites of memories and dreams. In Liggett, H. Perry D.C. (Eds.), Spatial Practices. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp. 243-273.
22. Liggett, H., Perry, D.C. (Eds.), 1995. Spatial Practices. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
23. Lowe, P., Clark, J., Seymour, S., Ward, I., 1997. Moralizing the Environment. Countryside change, farming and pollution. UCL Press, London.
24. Macnaghten, P., Urry, I., 1998. Contested Natures. Sage, London.
25. Marsden, T., 1999. Rural futures: the consumption countryside and its regulation. Sociologia Ruralis 39, 501-520.
26. McAfee, K., 1999. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17, 133-154.
27. McHenry, H., 1997. Wild flowers in the wrong field are weeds. Examining farmers' constructions of conservation. Environment and Planning A 29, 1039-1053.
28. Mels, T., 2002. Nature, home, and scenery: the official spatialities of Swedish national parks. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30, 135-154.
29. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 1994. A proposal for the Finnish Agri-Environmental Scheme. Working group memorandum 1994:19. Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
30. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 1995. Agriculture as a maintainer of diversity in the countryside. Working group memorandum 1995: 4. Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
31. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 1996. Renewable resources and biological diversity. The proposal of the biodiversity working group of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the sustainable use of biological diversity. Working group memorandum 1996:1. Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
32. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 1999. A proposal for the Finnish Agri-Environmental Scheme for the years 2000-2006. Working group memorandum 1999:13. Maa-ja metsätalousministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
33. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 2001. Usual good agricultural practice. (http://www.mmm.fi/julkaisuttkimus/esitteet/Tavi.pdf., quoted 2.5. 2002.) (in Finnish).
34. Ministry of the Environment, 1985. Memorandum of the committee on endangered fauna and flora. General part. Committee memorandum 1985:43. Ympäristöministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
35. Ministry of the Environment, 1991. Memorandum of the endangered flora and fauna monitoring group. Committee memorandum 1991:30. Ympäristöministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
36. Ministry of the Environment, 1992. Memorandum of the rural environmental programme committee: a proposal for the Finnish Agri-Enviromental Scheme. Committee memorandum 1992:68. Ympäristöministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
37. Ministry of the Environment, 1995. Tasks and responsibilities pertaining to national implementation of the United Nations Convention on biological diversity. Biodiversity working group. Working Group Report 1995: 4. Painatuskeskus, Helsinki (in Finnish).
38. Ministry of the Environment, 1997. Finnish national action plan on biological diversity for the years 1997-2005. Finnish Environment. Nature and Natural Resources 137. Ympäristöministeriö, Helsinki (in Finnish).
39. Morgan, K., Murdoch, J., 2000. Organic vs. conventional agriculture: knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain. Geoforum 31, 159-173.
40. National Genetic Resources Plan. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, 2001. (http://www.mmm.fi/maatalous/bioenitekniikka/geenivarat.pdf , quoted 11.10. 2001) (in Finnish).
41. Niemi-Iilahti, A., Jokinen, P., 1999. Three years' experience of EU integration: the case of CAP and agri-environmental subsidies in Finland. In Joas, M., Hermanson A-S. (Eds.), The Nordic Environments: Comparing Political, Administrative and Policy Aspects. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp. 233-259.
42. Nieminen, M., 2001. Rio-Bryssel-Helsinki-kolari. Paikallinen ja globaali luonnonsuojelussa. (Local and global in nature protection). Presentation at Environmental Politics and Lifestyle-Seminar. Rovaniemi, Finland October 10, 2001.
43. Oksa, J., Rannikko, P., 1996. The changing meanings of rurality challenge rural policies. New Rural Policy 3, 3-14.
44. Oksanen, A., 2001. Paikallisten asukkaiden kertomus Naturasta (Local residents' accounts of the Natura-programme). In: Tuhkanen, S., Lahti, M., Tantarimäki, S., Karjalainen, V. (Eds.), Tutkimusretkistä paikkatietojä;rjestelmiin-matkalla kulttuurimaantieteen maailmoissa. Turun yliopiston maantieteen laitoksen julkaisuja 164, 153-166.
45. Palonen, K., Summa, H., 1996. Pelkkää retoriikkaa. Tutkimuksen ja politiikan retoriikat. (Plain rhetoric. The rhetorics of research and politics). Vastapaino, Tampere.
46. Peuhkuri, T., Jokinen, P., 1999. The role of knowledge and spatial contexts in biodiversity policies: a sociological perspective. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 133-147.
47. Pinton, F., 2001. Conservation of biodiversity as a European directive: the challenge for France. Sociologia Ruralis 41, 329-342.
48. Pitkänen, M., Tiainen, J., 2001. Biodiversity of agricultural landscapes in Finland. BirdLife Finland Conservation Series 3. BirdLife Suomi, Helsinki.
49. Ploeg, J,D., van der Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., Roest, K. de, Sevilla-Guzmán, E., Ventura, F., 2000. Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40, 391-400.
50. Puurunen, M., 1998. Adjustments of the Finnish agriculture and horticulture in the first years in the EU. Final Report of the MATEUS Research Programme. Agricultural Economics Research Institute. Publications 89a.
51. Richardson, T., 2000. Discources of rurality in EU spatial policy: the European spatial development perspective. Sociologia Ruralis 40, 53-71.
52. Saaristo, K., 2000. Avoin asiantuntijuus. Ympäristökysymys ja monimuotoinen ekspertiisi. Jyväskylän yliopisto (Open expertise. The environmental question and diverse expertise). Nykykulttuurin tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 66. University of Jyväskyl̈a, Jyväskylä.
53. Sairinen, R., 2000. Regulatory reform of Finnish environmental policy. Helsinki University of Technology. Centre for Urban and Regional Studies Publications A 27. Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo.
54. Siiskonen, H., 2000. Myrkyttäkää, ruiskuttakaa, hävittäkää. Ruotsalaisten ja suomalaisten maatalouden ammattilehtien kasvinsuojeluvalistus 1940-1980 (Poison; Spray; Extinguish. The pesticide and insecticide usage education in Finnish and Swedish farmers' newspapers and magazines during 1940-1980). Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura. historiallisia tutkimuksia 209.
55. Suomen uhanalaisten lajien arviointi, 2000 (Inventory on endangered species in Finland) (suomen uhanalaisten lajien arviointi, in Finnish) (www.vyh.fi/luosuo/lumo/lasu/uhanal/mieti/tulokset.htm, quoted 21.5. 2001).
56. Uusitalo, E., 1998. Elinvoimaa maaseudulle - missä, kenelle,miten? Maaseutupolitiikan perusteet (Vitality to the countryside - where, whom, how The principles of rural policies). Otava, Helsinki.
57. Ward, N., Clark, J., Lowe, P., Seymour, S., 1998. Keeping matter in its place: pollution regulation and the reconfiguring of farmers and farming. Environment and Planning A 30, 1165-1178.
58. Winter, M., 1997. New policies and new skills: agricultural change and technology transfer. Sociologia Ruralis 37, 363-381.
59. WWF, leaflet 6.2. 2001. WWF panostaa laidunlihan tuottamiseen Suomessa (WWF promotes the production of "meadow meat" in Finland) (www.wwf.fi quoted 5.6.2001).