Beyond self-interest: Agency theory and the board in a satisficing world

British Journal of Management

Volumn 16, Issue SPEC. ISS., 2005, Pages

  Hendry, John ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15244354534     PISSN: 10453172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00447.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ambrose, M. L. and C. T. Kulik (1999). 'Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s', Journal of Management, 25, pp. 231-292.
2. Beer, M. and N. Katz (2003). 'Do Incentives Work? The Perceptions of a Worldwide Sample of Senior Executives', Human Resource Planning, 26(3), pp. 30-44.
3. Daily, C., D. R. Dalton and A. A. Cannella (2003). 'Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data', Academy of Management Review, 28, pp. 371-383.
4. Davis, J. H., F. D. Schoorman and L. Donaldson (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management', Academy of Management Review, 22, pp. 20-47.
5. Donaldson, L. and J. H. Davis (1991). 'Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns', Australian Journal of Management, 16, pp. 49-64.
6. Ghoshal, S. and P. Moran (1996). 'Bad for Practice: a Critique of Transaction Cost Theory', Academy of Management Review, 21, pp. 13-47.
7. Granovetter, M. (1985). 'Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness', American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 481-510.
8. Hendry, J. (2002). The Principal's Other Problems: Honest Incompetence and Management Contracts', Academy of Management Review, 27, pp. 98-113.
9. Hendry, J. (2004). Between Enterprise and Ethics: Business and Management in a Bimoral Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Hermalin, B. E. and M. S. Weisbach (2003). 'Boards of Directors as an Exogenously Determined Institution: a Survey of the Economic Literature', Economic Policy Review, 9(1), pp. 7-26.
11. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1994). The Nature of Man', Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), pp. 4-19.
12. Lakatos, I. (1970). 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes'. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp. 91-196. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Martin, R. (1993). The New Behaviorism: a Critique of Economics and Organization', Human Relations, 46, pp. 1085-1101.
14. Prendergast, C. (1999). The Provision of Incentives in Firms', Journal of Economic Literature, 37, pp. 7-63.
15. Roberts, J. D. (1996). 'From Discipline to Dialogue: Individualising and Socialising Forms of Accountability'. In R. Munro and J. Mouritsen (eds), Accountability, Power and Ethos. Chapman Hall, London.
16. Roberts, J. D. (2001). Trust and Control in Anglo-American Systems of Corporate Governance: the Individualising and Socialising Effects of Processes of Accountability', Human Relations, 54, pp. 1547-1572.
17. Roberts, J., T. McNulty, and P. Stiles (2005). 'Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom', British Journal of Management, 16, Special Issue, S5-S26.
18. Roe, M. J. (1997). 'Path Dependence, Political Options, and Governance Systems'. In K. J. Hopt and E. Wymeersch (eds), Comparative Corporate Governance, pp. 165-184. Walter de Gruyter, New York.
19. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational. Wiley, New York.