Genomic control for association studies under various genetic models

Biometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 186-192

  Zheng, Gang ^a   Freidlin, Boris ^b   Li, Zhaohai ^b,c   Gastwirth, Joseph L ^b,c  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochran Armitage trend test; Genetic model; Optimal genomic control; Variance inflation factor

Indexed keywords

DISEASE CONTROL; GENES; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CANDIDATE GENES; CASE-CONTROL STUDY; COCHRAN-ARMITAGE TREND TEST; CONTROL TESTS; GENETIC MODELS; GENOMICS; INFLATION FACTORS; OPTIMAL GENOMIC CONTROL; TREND TESTS; VARIANCE INFLATION FACTOR;

GENOME;

ALLELE; DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DOMINANT GENE; GENE CONTROL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC MODEL; GENOMICS; HUMAN; RECESSIVE GENE; SIMULATION;

EID: 15044352388     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.t01-1-.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Armitage, P. (1955). Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11, 375-386.
2. Bacanu, S.-A., Devlin, B., and Roeder, K. (2000). The power of genomic control. American Journal of Human Genetics 66, 1933-1944.
3. Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common chi-squared tests. Biometrics 10, 417-451.
4. Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. (1999). Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55, 997-1004.
5. Devlin, B., Roeder, K., and Wasserman, L. (2001). Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies. Theoretical Population Biology 60, 155-166.
6. Evett, I. W. and Weir, B. S. (1998). Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
7. Freidlin, B., Zheng, G., Li, Z., and Gastwirth, J. L. (2002). Trend tests for case-control studies of genetic markers: Power, sample size and robustness. Human Heredity 53, 146-152.
8. Lee, W. C. and Chang, C. H. (2000). Estimating genotype relative risks in case-parental control studies: An optimal weighting approach. American Journal of Epidemiology 152, 487-492.
9. Risch, N. and Merikangas, K. (1996). The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273, 1516-1517.
10. Risch, N. and Teng, J. (1998). The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling. Genome Research 8, 1273-1288.
11. Pritchard, J. K. and Donnelly, P. (2001). Case-control studies of association in structured or admixed populations. Theoretical Population Biology 60, 227-237.
12. Sasieni, P. D. (1997). From genotypes to genes: Doubling the sample size. Biometrics 53, 1253-1261.
13. Satten, G. A., Flanders, W. D., and Yang, Q. (2001). Accounting for unmeasured population substructure in case-control studies of genetic association using a novel latent-class model. American Journal of Human Genetics 68, 466-477.
14. Schaid, D. J. and Sommer, S. S. (1993). Genotype relative risks: Methods for design and analysis of candidate-gene association studies. American Journal of Human Genetics 53, 1114-1126.
15. Scherag, A., Dempfle, A., Hinney, A., Hebebrand, J., and Schafer, H. (2002). Confidence intervals for genotype relative risks and allele frequencies from the case parent trio design for candidate-gene studies. Human Heredity 54, 210-217.
16. Sham, P. (1998). Statistics in Human Genetics. London: Arnold.
17. Spielman, R. S., McGinnis, R., and Ewens, W. J. (1993). Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: The insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). American Journal of Human Genetics 52, 506-516.
18. Tian, X.-L., Kadaba, R., You, S.-A., et al. (2004). Identification of an angiogenic factor that when mutated causes susceptibility to Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Nature 427, 640-645.
19. Zheng, G., Freidlin, B., Li, Z., and Gastwirth, J. L. (2003). Choice of scores in trend tests for case-control studies of candidate-gene associations. Biometrical Journal 45, 335-348.