Closure procedures for monotone bi-factorial dose-response designs

Biometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 269-276

  Hellmich, M ^a   Lehmacher, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bi factorial design; Closure procedure; Dose finding; Fixed combination; Likelihood ratio test; Minimum effective dose; Multiple contrast test; Partial matrix order

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

BI-FACTORIAL DESIGN; CLOSURE PROCEDURE; CONTRAST TESTS; DOSE FINDING; FACTORIAL DESIGN; FIXED COMBINATIONS; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS; MINIMUM EFFECTIVE DOSE; MULTIPLE CONTRAST TEST; PARTIAL MATRIX; PARTIAL MATRIX ORDER;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; DIURETIC AGENT;

DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; SAFETY;

BIOMETRY; DOSE CALCULATION; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG DOSE REGIMEN; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 15044351813     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030709.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Bartholomew, D. J. (1959). A test of homogeneity for ordered alternatives. Biometrika 46, 36-48.
2. Bartholomew, D. J. (1961). Ordered tests in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 48, 325-332.
3. Bretz, F. (1999). Powerful modifications of Williams' test on trend. Ph.D Thesis, University of Hannover, Germany.
4. Bretz, F. and Hothorn, L. A. (2002). Detecting dose-response using contrasts: Asymptotic power and sample size determination for binomial data. Statistics in Medicine 21, 3325-3335.
5. Bretz, F., Genz, A., and Hothorn, L. A. (2001). On the numerical availability of multiple comparison procedures. Biometrical Journal 43, 645-656.
6. Buchheister, B. and Lehmacher, W. (1999). Establishing desirable dose combinations with multiple testing procedures. In Medical Informatics, Biostatistics and Epidemiology for Efficient Health Care and Medical Research, N. Victor, M. Blettner, L. Edler, R. Haux, P. Knaup-Gregori, M. Pritsch, J. Wahrendorf, J. Windeler, and S. Ziegler (eds), 18-21. München: Urban & Vogel.
7. Budde, M. and Bauer, P. (1989). Multiple test procedures in clinical dose finding studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 792-796.
8. CPMP/EWP. (2002). Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, Efficacy Working Party. Points to consider on multiplicity issues in clinical trials, CPMP/EWP/ 908/99. Available at http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/ewp/090899en. pdf.
9. Hellmich, M. (2001). Monitoring clinical trials with multiple arms. Biometrics 57, 892-898.
10. Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75, 800-802.
11. Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: Wiley.
12. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65-70.
13. Hothorn, L. A. and Hauschke, D. (2000). Identifying the maximum safe dose: A multiple testing approach. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 10, 15-30.
14. Hothorn, L. A. and Lehmacher, W. (1991). A simple testing procedure "control versus k treatments" for one-sided ordered alternatives, with applications in toxicology. Biometrical Journal 33, 179-189.
15. Hothorn, L. A., Neuhäuser, M., and Koch, H. F. (1997). Analysis of randomized dose-finding-studies: Closure test modifications based on multiple contrast tests. Biometrical Journal 39, 467-479.
16. Hung, H. M. J. (2000). Evaluation of a combination drug with multiple doses in unbalanced factorial design clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 19, 2079-2087.
17. Hung, H. M. J., Chi, G. Y. H., and Lipicky, R. J. (1993). Testing for the existence of a desirable dose combination. Biometrics 49, 85-94.
18. Hung, H. M. J., Chi, G. Y. H., and Lipicky, R. J. (1994). On some statistical methods for analysis of combination drug studies. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Method Series A 23, 361-376.
19. Ihaka, R. and Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5, 299-314.
20. Laska, E. M. and Meisner, M. J. (1989). Testing whether an identified treatment is best. Biometrics 45, 1139-1151.
21. Lehmacher, W., Kieser, M., and Hothorn, L. (2000). Sequential and multiple testing for dose-response analysis. Drug Information Journal 34, 591-597.
22. Marcus, R., Peritz, E., and Gabriel, K. R. (1976). On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 63, 487-497.
23. Maurer, W., Hothorn, L. A., and Lehmacher, W. (1995). Multiple comparisons in drug clinical trials and preclinical assays: A-priori ordered hypotheses. In Biometrie in der Chemisch-Pharmazeutischen Industrie 6, J. Vollmar (ed), 3-18. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
24. Miwa, T., Hayter, A. J., and Liu, W. (2000). Calculations of level probabilities for normal random variables with unequal variances with applications to Bartholomew's test in unbalanced one-way models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 34, 17-32.
25. Mukerjee, H., Robertson, T., and Wright, F. T. (1986). Multiple contrast tests for testing against a simple tree ordering. In Advances in Order Restricted Statistical Inference, R. L. Dykstra and T. Robertson (eds), 203-230. Berlin: Springer.
26. Mukerjee, H., Robertson, T., and Wright, F. T. (1987). Comparison of several treatments with a control using multiple contrasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 902-910.
27. Qian, S. and Eddy, W. F. (1996). An algorithm for isotonic regression on ordered rectangular grids. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5, 225-235.
28. Robertson, T., Wright, F. T., and Dykstra, R. L. (1988). Order Restricted Statistical Inference. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
29. Rom, D. M., Costello, R. J., and Connell, L. T. (1994). On closed test procedures for dose-response analysis. Statistics in Medicine 13, 1583-1596.
30. Ruberg, S. J. (1989). Contrasts for identifying the minimum effective dose. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84, 816-822.
31. Ryan, L. (1992). Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity. Biometrics 48, 163-174.
32. Shirley, E. A. (1996). A literature review of statistical methods for the analysis of general toxicology data. In Statistics in Toxicology, B. J. T. Morgan (ed), 20-32. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Simes, R. J. (1986). An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73, 751-754.
34. Snapinn, S. M. (1987). Evaluating the efficacy of a combination therapy. Statistics in Medicine 6, 657-665.
35. Tamhane, A. C., Hochberg, Y., and Dunnett, C. W. (1996). Multiple test procedures for dose finding. Biometrics 52, 21-37.
36. Tukey, J. W., Ciminera, J. L., and Heyse, J. W. (1985). Testing the statistical certainty of a response to increasing doses of a drug. Biometrics 41, 295-301.
37. Westfall, P. H., Tobias, R. D., Rom, D., Wolfinger, R., and Hochberg, Y. (1999). Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests. Using the SAS® System. Books by Users. Cary, North Carolina: SAS® Institute.
38. Williams, D. A. (1971). A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics 27, 103-117.
39. Williams, D. A. (1972). The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics 28, 519-531.