Adaptation and propagule pressure determine invasion dynamics: Insights from a spatially explicit model for sexually reproducing species

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 37-51

  Travis, J M J ^a   Hammershoj M ^b,c   Stephenson, C ^d  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b D   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genetics; Introduced species; Invasion; Lattice model; Patch occupancy; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 14844364858     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Cadet, C., Ferriere, R., Metz, J.A.J. and van Baalen, M. in press. The evolution of dispersal under demographic stochasticity. Am. Nat.
2. Collingham, Y.C., Wadsworth, R.A., Huntley, B. and Hulme, P.E. 2000. Predicting the spatial distribution of non-indigenous riparian weeds: issues of spatial scale and extent. J. Appl. Ecol., 37: 13-27.
3. Dytham, C. 1994. Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence - a cellular model. J. Anim. Ecol., 63: 490-491.
4. Dytham, C. 1995. Competitive coexistence and empty patches in spatially explicit metapopulation models. J. Anim. Ecol., 64: 145-146.
5. Ellner, S.P. 2001. Pair approximation for lattice models for multiple interaction scales. J. Theor. Biol., 210: 435-447.
6. Fahrig, L. 1997. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J. Wildlife Manage., 61: 603-610.
7. Gandon, S. 1999. Kin competition, the cost of inbreeding and the evolution of dispersal. J. Theor. Biol., 200: 345-364.
8. Green, R.E. 1997. The influence of numbers released on the outcome of attempts to introduce exotic bird species to New Zealand. J. Anim. Ecol., 66: 25-35.
9. Hänfling, B. and Kollmann, J. 2002. An evolutionary perspective of biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17: 545-546.
10. Hassell, M.P., Comins, H.N. and May, R.M. 1994. Species coexistence and self-organizing spatial dynamics. Nature, 370: 290-292.
11. Higgins, S.I., Richardson, D.M. and Cowling, R.M. 2001. Validation of a spatial simulation model of a spreading alien plant population. J. Appl. Ecol., 38: 571-584.
12. Hill, M.F. and Caswell, H. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds on fractal landscapes. Ecol. Lett., 2: 121-127.
13. Holt, R.D. 2003. On the evolutionary ecology of species' ranges. Evol. Ecol. Res., 5: 159-178.
14. Holt, R.D. and McPeek, M.A. 1996. Chaotic population dynamics favors the evolution of dispersal. Am. Nat., 148: 709-718.
15. Hovestadt, T., Messner, S. and Poethke, H.J. 2001. Evolution of reduced mortality and 'fat-tailed' dispersal kernels in autocorrelated landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268: 385-391.
16. Hutchinson, T.F. and Vankat, J.L. 1997. Invasibility and effects of Amur honeysuckle in southwestern Ohio forests. Conserv. Biol., 11: 1117-1124.
17. Irwin, A.J. and Taylor, P.D. 2001. Evolution of altruism in stepping-stone populations with overlapping generations. Theor. Pop. Biol., 60: 315-325.
18. Keymer, J.E., Marquet, P.A., Velasco-Hernandez, J.X. and Levin, S.A. 2000. Extinction thresholds and metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes. Am. Nat., 156: 478-494.
19. Kirkpatrick, M. and Barton, N.H. 1997. Evolution of a species' range. Am. Nat., 150: 1-23.
20. Kowarik, I. 1995. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In Plant Invasions - General Aspects and Special Problems. (P. Pysek, K. Prach, M. Rejmanek and M. Wade, eds.), pp. 15-38. Amsterdam: SPB Academic.
21. Lande, R. 1987. Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. Am. Nat., 130: 624-635.
22. Lee, C.E. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol., 17: 386-391.
23. Le Galliard, J.F., Ferriere, R. and Dieckmann, U. 2003. The adaptive dynamics of altruism in spatially heterogeneous populations. Evolution, 57: 1-17.
24. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 15: 237-240.
25. Mack, R.N. 1985. Invading plants: their potential contribution to population biology. In Studies on Plant Demography: A Festschrift for John L. Harper (J. White, ed.), pp. 127-142. London: Academic Press.
26. Mitteldorf, J. and Wilson, D.S. 2000. Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism. J. Theor. Biol., 204: 481-496.
27. Moilanen, A. 1999. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. Ecology, 80: 1031-1043.
28. Murrell, D.J., Travis, J.M.J. and Dytham, C. 2002. The evolution of dispersal distance in spatially-structured populations. Oikos, 97: 229-236.
29. Nakamaru, M., Matsuda, H. and Iwasa, Y. 1997. The evolution of cooperation in a lattice-structured population. J. Theor. Biol., 184: 65-81.
30. Nee, S. and May, R.M. 1992. Dynamics of metapopulations - habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol., 61: 37-40.
31. Oliver, A., Canton, R., Campo, P. and Baquero, F. 2000. High frequency of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Science, 288: 1251-1253.
32. Ovaskainen, O. 2002. The effective size of a metapopulation living in a heterogeneous patch network. Am. Nat., 160: 612-628.
33. Poethke, H.J. and Hoevestadt, T. 2002. Evolution of density- and patch-size-dependent dispersal rates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 637-645.
34. Rouget, M. and Richardson, D.M. 2003. Inferring process from pattern in plant invasions: a semimechanistic model incorporating propagule pressure and environmental factors. Am. Nat., 162: 713-724.
35. Sakai, A.K., Allendorf, F.W., Holt, J.S. et al. 2001. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 32: 305-332.
36. Sniegowski, P.D., Gerrish, P.J., Johnson, T. and Shaver, A. 2000. The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes and consequences. BioEssays, 22: 1057-1066.
37. Snyder, R.E. and Chesson, P. 2003. Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneity. Ecol. Lett., 6: 301-309.
38. Stockwell, C.A., Hendry, A.P. and Kinnison, M.T. 2003. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18: 94-101.
39. Taddei, F., Radman, M., Maynard-Smith, J. et al. 1997. Role of mutator alleles in adaptive evolution. Nature, 387: 700-702.
40. Tenaillon, O., Toupance, B., Le Nagard, H., Taddei, F. and Godelle, B. 1999. Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria. Genetics, 152: 485-493.
41. Tenaillon, O., Le Nagard, H., Godelle, B. and Taddei, F. 2000. Mutators and sex in bacteria: conflict between adaptive strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 10465-10470.
42. Travis, E.R. and Travis, J.M.J. 2004. Mutators in space: the dynamics of high-mutability clones in a two-patch model. Genetics, 167: 513-522.
43. Travis, J.M.J. 2003. Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270: 467-173.
44. Travis, J.M.J. and Dytham, C. 1999. Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 266: 723-728.
45. Travis, J.M.J. and Dytham, C. 2002. Dispersal evolution during invasions. Evol. Ecol. Res., 4: 1119-1129.
46. Travis, J.M.J. and Travis, E.R. 2002. Mutator dynamics in fluctuating environments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 591-597.
47. Travis, J.M.J., Murrell, D.J. and Dytham, C. 1999. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 266: 1837-1842.
48. Wadsworth, R.A., Collingham, Y.C., Willis, S.G., Huntley, B. and Hulme, P.E. 2000. Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: are they out of control? J. Appl. Ecol., 37: 28-38.
49. Williamson, M.H. 1996. Biological Invasions. Population and Community Biology Series. London: Chapman & Hall.
50. With, K.A. and King, A.W. 1999. Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. Conserv. Biol., 13: 314-326.