Learning to detect error in movement timing using physical and observational practice

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 28-41

  Black, Charles B ^a   Wright, David L ^b   Magnuson, Curt E ^b   Brueckner, Sebastian ^c  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Error detection; Motor skills; Observation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OBSERVATION; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 14844359421     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599259     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150.
2. Adams, J. A. (1986). Use of models knowledge of results to increase the observer’s performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89–98.
3. Adams, J. A., & Goetz, E. T. (1973). Feedback and practice as variables in error detection and correction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 5, 217–224.
4. Adams, J. A., Goetz, E. T., & Marshall, P. H. (1972). Response feedback and motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 391–397.
5. Black, C. B., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Can observational practice facilitate error recognition and movement production? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 331–339.
6. Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 957-979.
7. Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2000). On the cognitive basis of observational learning: Development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 846-867.
8. Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 18–26.
9. Buekers, M., & Magill, R. A. (1995). The role of task experience and prior knowledge for detecting invalid augmented feedback while learning a motor skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 84–97.
10. Carroll, W., & Bandura, A. (1982). The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: Making the unobservable observable. JournalofMotor Behavior, 14, 153–167.
11. Carroll, W., & Bandura, A. (1985). Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 269–281.
12. Carroll, W., & Bandura, A. (1987). Translating cognition into action: The role of visual guidance in observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 385–398.
13. Carroll, W., & Bandura, A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 85–97.
14. Fendrich, D. W., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (1991). Longterm repetition effects for motoric and perceptual procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 17, 137–151.
15. Green, S., & Sherwood, D. E. (2000). The benefits of random variable practice for accuracy and temporal error detection in a rapid aiming task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 398–402.
16. Hodges, N. J., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2003). The role ofvideo in facilitating perception and action of a novel coordination movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 247–260.
17. Howard, J. H., Mutter, S. A., & Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimenta, l Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1029–1039.
18. Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: Evidence for a common timing mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 3–18.
19. Ivry, R. B., & Keele, S. W. (1989). Timing functions of the cerebellum. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 136–152.
20. Keele, S. W., & Ivry, R. B. (1987). Modular analysis of timing in motor skill. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology oflearning a.nd motivation (pp. 183-228). London: Academic Press.
21. Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Kohl, R. M., & Shea, C. H. (1992). Pew (1966) revisited: Acquisition of hierarchical control as a function of observational practice. Journal ofMotor Behavior, 24, 247–260.
23. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 51–59.
24. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999). Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 79-83
25. Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Bruechert, L., & Little, M. (2002). Auditory model enhances relative time learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 299–307.
26. Newell, K. M. (1974). Knowledge of results and motor learning. Journal ofMotor Behavior, 6, 235–244.
27. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.
28. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
29. Schmidt, R. A., & White, J. L. (1972). Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills: A test of Adams’ closed-loop theory. Journal ofMotor Behavior, 4, 143–153.
30. Scully, D. M., & Newell, K. M. (1985). Observational learning and the acquisition of motor skills: Toward a visual perception perspective. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 11, 169–186.
31. Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 27–36.
32. Sheffield, F. N. (1961). Theoretical considerations in the learning of complex sequential tasks from demonstrations and practice. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 13-32). Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
33. Sherwood, D. E. (1996). The benefits of random variable practice for spatial accuracy and error detection in a rapid aiming task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 35–43.
34. Vogt, S. (1995). On the relations between perceiving, imagining, and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences. British Journal ofPsychology, 86, 191–216.
35. Vogt, S. (1996). Imagery and perception-action mediation in imitative actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 79–86.
36. Vogt, S. (2002). Dimensions of imitative perception-action mediation. In K. Dautenhahn & C. Nehaniv (Eds.), Imitation in animals and artifacts (pp. 525-554). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
37. Vogt, S., Stadler, M., & Kruse, P. (1988). Self-organization aspects in the temporal formation of movement gestalts. Human Movement Science, 7, 365–406.
38. Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.
39. Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H., (2001). Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 32–38.
40. Wright, D. L., Li, Y, & Coady, W. (1997). Cognitive processes related to contextual interference and observational learning: A replication of Blandin, Proteau, and Alain (1994). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 106–109.
41. Zanone, P., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: Collective and component levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1454–1480.