Physicochemical and functional properties of soy protein substrates modified by low levels of protease hydrolysis

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Jung, Stephanie ^a   Murphy, Patricia A ^a   Johnson, Lawrence A ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endo protease; Protein functionality; Protein hydrolysis; Soy protein

Indexed keywords

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 14844310248     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07080.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. [AACC] American Assn. of Cereal Chemistry. 1983. Method 44-15A. In: Approved methods of the American Assn. of Cereal Chemistry. 8th ed. St. Paul, Minn.: AACC.
2. Adler-Nissen J. 1986. Methods in food protein hydrolysis. In: Enzymatic hydrolysis of food proteins. New York: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers. p 110-30.
3. Adler-Nissen J, Olsen HS. 1979. The influence of peptide chain length on taste and functional properties of enzymatically modified soy protein. In: Pour-El A, editor. Functionality and protein structure. ACS Symposium Series. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society. p 125-47.
4. Don BLS, Pilosof AMR, Bartholomai GB. 1991. Enzymatic modification of soy protein concentrates by fungal and bacterial proteases. J Am Oil Chem Soc 68:102-5.
5. Finley JW. 1989. Effects of processing on proteins: An overview. In: Phillips RD, Finley JW, editors. Protein quality and the effects of processing. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker. p 1-9.
6. Germans JB, Phillips LG. 1989. Molecular properties of proteins important in foams. In: Kinsella JE, Soucie WG, editors. Food proteins. Champaign, Ill.: The American Oil Chemists' Society. p 132-43.
7. Henn RL, Netto FM. 1998. Biochemical characterization and enzymatic hydrolysis of different commercial soybean protein isolates. J Agric Food Chem 46:3009-15.
8. Jung S, Rickert DA, Deak NA, Aldin ED, Recknor J, Johnson LA, Murphy PA. 2003. Comparison of Kjeldahl and Dumas methods for determining protein contents of soybean products. J Am Oil Chem Soc 80:1169-73.
9. Kim SY, Park PSW, Rhee KC. 1990. Functional properties of proteolytic enzyme modified soy protein. J Agric Food Chem 38:651-6.
10. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-5.
11. Liu M, Lee DS, Damodaran S. 1999. Emulsifying properties of acidic subunits of soy 11s globulin. J Agric Food Chem 47:4970-5.
12. Lopez LMI, Brullo A, Natalucci CL, Caffini NO, Sorgentini NA, Wagner JR. 1998. Thermal behavior, solubility and structural properties of soy concentrate hydrolyzed by new plant proteases. J Food Biochem 22:125-41.
13. Nakai S. 1983. Structure-function relationships of food proteins with an emphasis on the importance of protein hydrophobicity. J Agric Food Chem 31:676-83.
14. Neuhoff V, Arold N, Taube D, Ehrhardt W. 1998. Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using coomassie brilliant blue G-250 and R-250. Electrophoresis 9:255-62.
15. Nielsen PM. 1997. Functionality of protein hydrolysates. In: Damodaran S, Paraf A, editors. Food proteins and their applications. New York: Marcel Dekker. New York. p 443-73.
16. Nir I, Feldman Y, Aserin A, Garti N. 1994. Surface properties and emulsification behavior of denatured soy proteins. J Food Sci 53:606-10.
17. Ortiz SE, Anon MC. 2000. Analysis of products, mechanisms of reaction, and some functional properties of soy protein hydrolysates. J Am Oil Chem Soc 77:1293-301.
18. Pearce KN, Kinsella JE. 1978. Emulsifying properties of proteins. Evaluation of a turbidimetric technique. J Agric Food Chem 26:716-23.
19. Puppo MC, Anon MC. 1999. Soybean protein dispersions at acid pH. Thermal and rheological properties. J Food Sci 64:50-6.
20. Puski G. 1975. Modification of functional properties of soy proteins by proteolytic enzyme treatment. Cereal Chem 52:655-64.
21. Qi M, Hettiarachchy NS, Kalapathy U. 1997. Solubility and emulsifying properties of soy protein isolates modified by pancreatin. J Food Sci 62:1110-5.
22. Riblett AL, Herald TJ, Schmidt KA, Tilley KA. 2001. Characterization of β-conglycinin and glycinin soy protein fractions from four selected soybean genotypes. J Agric Food Chem 49:4983-9.
23. Rickert DA, Johnson LA, Murphy PA. 2004. Functional properties of improved glycinin and β-conglycinin fractions. J Food Sci 69:303-11.
24. Wagner JR, Anon MC. 1990. Influence of denaturation, hydrophobicity and sulfhydryl content on solubility and water absorbing capacity of soy protein isolates. J Food Sci 55:765-70.
25. Wagner JR, Gueguen J. 1999. Surface functional properties of native, acid-treated, and reduced soy glycinin. 1. Foaming properties. J Agric Food Chem 47:2174-80.
26. Wagner JR, Sorgentini DA, Anon MC. 1996. Thermal and electrophoretic behavior, hydrophobicity, and some functional properties of acid-treated soy isolates. J Agric Food Chem 44:1881-9.
27. Were L, Hettiarachchy NS, Kalapathy U. 1997. Modified soy proteins with improved foaming and water hydration properties. J Food Sci 62:821-3, 50.
28. Wu WU, Hettiarachchy NS, Qi M. 1998. Hydrophobicity, solubility, and emulsifying properties of soy protein peptides prepared by papain modification and ultrafiltration. J Am Oil Chem Soc 75:845-50.