Semisupervised learning from different information sources

Knowledge and Information Systems

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 289-309

  Li, Tao ^a   Ogihara, Mitsunori ^a  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision tree; Minimise disagreement; Semisupervised; Support vector machines; Unlabelled data

Indexed keywords

DECISION TREES; GENE EXPRESSION; HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCIES; FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION DATA; LABELED AND UNLABELED DATA; MINIMISE DISAGREEMENT; SEMI-SUPERVISED; UNLABELLED DATA; WEBPAGE CLASSIFICATIONS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 14844303546     PISSN: 02191377     EISSN: 02193116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-004-0155-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abney S (2002) Bootstrapping. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 360-367
2. Allwein EL, Schapire RE, Singer Y (2000) Reducing multiclass to binary: a unifying approach for margin classifiers. In: Langley P (ed) Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning (ICML 2000). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 9-16
3. Becker S (1996) Mutual information maximization: Models of cortical self-organization. Netw Comput Neural Syst 7:7-31
4. Bennett KP, Demiriz A, Maclin R (2002) Exploiting unlabeled data in ensemble methods. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (SIGKDD 2002). ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 289-296
5. Blum A, Chawla S (2001) Learning from labeled and unlabeled data using graph mincuts. In: Brodley CE, Danyluk AP (eds) Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on machine learning (ICML 2001). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 19-26
6. Blum A, Mitchell T (1998) Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on computational learning theory (COLT 1998). ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 92-100
7. Brown MPS, Grundy WN, Lin D, Cristianini N, Sugnet C, Furey TS, Manuel Ares J, Haussler D (2000) Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data using support vector machines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(1):262-267
8. Buc F, Grandvalet Y, Ambroise C (2002) Semi-supervised marginboost. In: Dietterich TG, Becker S, Ghahramani Z (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 14 (NIPS 2001). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 553-560
9. Castelli V, Cover T (1996) The relative value of labeled and unlabeled samples in pattern recognition with an unknown mixing parameter. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 42:2102-2117
10. Collins M, Singer Y (1999) Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In: Proceedings of the 1999 joint SIGDAT conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and very large corpora. ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 100-110
11. Cozman FG, Cohen I (2002) Unlabeled data can degrade classification performance of generative classifiers. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international Florida artificial intelligence society conference (FLAIRS 2002), pp 327-331
12. Dasgupta S, Littman ML, McAllester D (2001) PAC generalization bounds for co-training. In: Dietterich TG, Becker S, Ghahramani Z (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 14 (NIPS 2001). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 375-382
13. De Sa VR, Ballard D (1998) Category learning through multimodality sensing. Neural Comput 10:1097-1117
14. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc B 39(1):1-38
15. Fung G, Mangasarian O (2001) Semi-supervised support vector machines for unlabeled data classification. Optim Methods Softw 15:29-44
16. Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1994) Supervised learning from incomplete data via an EM approach. In: Cowan JD, Tesauro G, Alspector J (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems 6 (NIPS 1993). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 120-127
17. Goldman S, Zhou Y (2000) Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data. In: Langley P (ed) Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning (ICML 2000). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 327-334
18. Li T, Zhu S, Li Q, Ogihara M (2003) Gene functional classification by semi-supervised learning from heterogeneous data. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC'03). ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 78-82
19. McGurk H, MacDonald J (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264:746-748
20. Mitchell TM (1997) Machine learning. McGraw-Hill
21. Muslea I, Minton S, Knoblock CA (2000) Selective sampling with redundant views. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth national conference on artificial intelligence and twelfth conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence (AAAI/IAAI 2000). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 621-626
22. Neal R, Hinton G (1998) A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In: Jordan MI (ed) Learning in graphical models. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 355-368
23. Nigam K (2001) Using unlabeled data to improve text classification. Doctoral Dissertation, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
24. Nigam K, Ghani R (2000) Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM 2000). ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 86-93
25. Nigam K, McCallum AK, Thrun S, Mitchell TM (2000) Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Mach Learn 39:103-134
26. Pavlidis P, Weston J, Cai J, Grundy WN (2001) Gene functional classification from heterogeneous data. In: Proceedings of fifth annual international conference on computational molecular biology (RECOMB 2001). ACM Press, New York, NY, pp 249-255
27. Quinlan J (1993) C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA
28. Roth D, Zelenko D (2000) Toward a theory of learning coherent concepts. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth national conference on artificial intelligence and twelfth conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence (AAAI/IAAI 2000). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 639-644
29. Seeger M (2000) Learning with labeled and unlabeled data. Technical report, Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
30. Vapnik VN (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York, NY
31. Weiss G, Provost F (2001) The effect of class distribution on classifier learning: an empirical study. Technical report ML-TR 44, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
32. Wu L, Oviatt SL, Cohen PR (1999) Multimodal integration - a statistical view. IEEE Trans Multimedia 1:334-341
33. Zhang T, Oles F (2000) A probability analysis on the value of unlabeled data for classification problems. In: Langley P (ed) Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning (ICML 2000). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 1191-1198