Twenty-five years after Rodriguez: What have we learned?

Teachers College Record

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 480-513

  Koski, William S ^a   Levin, Henry M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034382556     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0161-4681.00065     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Aronow, G. F. (1980). The Special Master in School Desegregation Cases: The Evolution of Roles in the Reformation of Public Institutions through Litigation. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 7, 739-782.
2. Barnett, W. S., & Boocock, S., eds. (1998). Early Care and Education for Children in Poverty. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
3. Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1984). The Measurement of Equity in School Finance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Betts, J. (1996). Is There a Link between School Input and Earnings? Fresh Scrutiny of an Old Literature. In Gary Burtless (ed.), Does Money Matter? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 141-91.
5. Bowles, S., & Levin, H. M. (1968). The Determinants of Scholastic Achievement - An Appraisal of Some Recent Evidence. The Journal of Human Resources, 3, 3-24.
6. Brown, G. D. (1994). Binding Advisory Opinions: A Federal Courts Perspective on the State School Finance Decisions. Boston College Law Review, 35, 543-568.
7. Brown, P. R., & Elmore, R. F. (1982). Analyzing the Impact of School Finance Reform. In N. H. Cambron-McCabe & A. Odden (eds.), The Changing Politics of School Finance. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
8. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
9. Card, D., & Kreuger, A. B. (1996). Labor Market Effects of School Quality: Theory and Evidence. In Gary Burtless (ed.), Does Money Matter? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 97-140.
10. _. (1992). Does School Quality Matter? Returns to Education and the Characteristics of Public Schools in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1-40.
11. Chambers, J., & Hartman, W. T. (1983). A Resource Cost-Based Approach to the Funding of Educational Programs: An Application to Special Education. In J. Chambers and W. T. Hartman (Eds.), Special Educational Policies. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 193-240.
12. Chayes, A. (1976). The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. Harvard Law Review, 89, 1289-1316.
13. Clune, W. H. (ed.) (1994a). Equity and Adequacy in Education: Issues for Policy and Finance. Educational Policy, 8(4).
14. _. (1994b). The Shift from Adequacy to Equity in School Finance. Educational Policy 8, 376-96.
15. _, & Lindquist, R. E. (1979). Serrano and Robinson: Studies in the Implementation of Fiscal Equity and Effective Education in State Public Law Litigation. In P. Piele (ed.), 2, 67-120, Schools and the Courts. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
16. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. Coons, J. E., Clune, III, W. H., & Sugarman, S. D. (1970). Private Wealth and Public Education. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
18. Cooper, P. J. (1988). Hard Judicial Choices: Federal District Court Judges and State and Local Officials. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. CSR Research Consortium. (June 1999). Class Size Reduction in California 1996-98, Report Summary. Palo Alto, CA: EdSource.
20. Dayton, J. (1996). Examining the Efficacy of Judicial Involvement in Public School Finance Reform. Journal of Education Finance, 22, 1-27.
21. Diver, C. S. (1979). The Judge as Political Power Broker: Superintending Structural Change in Public Institutions. Virginia Law Review, 65, 43-106.
22. Eisenberg, T., & Yeazell, S. C. (1980). The Ordinary and the Extraordinary in Institutional Litigation. Harvard Law Review, 93, 465-517.
23. Enrich, P. (1995). Leaving Equality Behind: New Directions in School Finance Reform. Vanderbilt Law Review, 48, 101-194.
24. Evans, W. N., Murray, S. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1997). Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses after Serrano. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 10-31.
25. Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for Public Education: New Evidence on How and Why Money Matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465-97.
26. _, & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and Why Money Matters: An Analysis of Alabama Schools. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding School Accountable. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 265-298.
27. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1990). Answers and Questions about Class Size: A Statewide Experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 557-77.
28. Fischel, W. A. (1996). Did Serrano Cause Proposition 13? National Tax Journal, 42, 465-473.
29. Garms, W. I., Guthrie, J. W., & Pierce, L. C. (1978). School Finance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 190-93.
30. Grissmer, D., Flanagan, A., & Williamson, S. (1998). Does Money Matter for Minority and Disadvantaged Students? Assessing the New Empirical Evidence. In W. J. Fowler, Jr. (ed.), Developments in School Finance, 1997, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES 98-212, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, 75-98.
31. Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Education Production Functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14, 351-388.
32. _. (1984). Making Schools Work. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
33. _. (1986). The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-77.
34. _. (1989). The Impact of Differential Expenditures on School Performance. Educational Researcher, 18, 45-51.
35. _, & Kain, J. F. (1973). On the Value of Equality of Educational Opportunity as a Guide to Public Policy. In F. Mosteller & D. P. Moynihan (Eds.), On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 116-145.
36. _, & Rivkin, S. G. (1997). Understanding the Twentieth-Century Growth in U. S. School Spending. The Journal of Human Resources, 22, 35-68.
37. Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Different School Inputs on Student Outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-14.
38. Heise, M. (1995a). The Effect of Constitutional Litigation on Education Finance: More Preliminary Analyses and Modeling. Journal of Education Finance, 21, 195-216.
39. Heise, M. (1995b). State Constitutions, School Finance Litigation, and the "Third Wave": From Equity to Adequacy. Temple Law Review, 68, 1151-1172.
40. Hickrod, G. A., Hines, E. R., Anthony, G. P., Dively, J. A., & Pruyne, G. B. (1992). The Effect of Constitutional Litigation on Education Finance: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Education Finance, 18, 180-210.
41. Hopfenberg, W., Levin, H. M., and associates. (1993). The Accelerated Schools Resource Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
42. Inkeles, A. (1966). The Socialization of Competence. Harvard Educational Review, 36, 265-83.
43. Jaffe, M., & Kersch, K. (1991). Guaranteeing a State Right to a Quality Education: The Judicial-Political Dialogue in New Jersey. Journal of Law and Education, 20, 271-300.
44. Jencks, C. S. (1973). The Coleman Report and the Conventional Wisdom. In F. Mosteller & D. P. Moynihan (Eds.), On Equality of Educational Opportunity. New York: Random House, 3-68.
45. _. (1988). Whom Must We Treat Equally for Educational Opportunity to Be Equal. Ethics, 98, 518-533.
46. Johnson, C. A., & Canon, B. (1984). Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
47. Joondeph, B. W. (1995). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: An Empirical Analysis of Litigation-Prompted School Finance Reform. Santa Clara Law Review, 35, 763-824.
48. Kalodner, H., & Fishman, J. (eds.) (1978). Limits of Justice: The Courts' Role in School Desegregation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
49. Kirp, D., & Babcock, G. (1981). Judge and Company: Court-Appointed Masters, School Desegregation, and Institutional Reform. Alabama Law Review, 32, 313-397.
50. Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497-532.
51. Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (1986). The Allocation of Resources to Special Education and Regular Instruction. In H. Ladd, Holding Schools Accountable. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 221-257.
52. Lehne, R. (1978). The Quest for Justice. New York: Longman.
53. Levin, H. M. (1998). Educational Performance Standards and the Economy. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 4-10.
54. _. (1994). The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Achieving Educational Equity. In R. Berne & L. O. Picus (Eds.), Outcome Equity in Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 167-190.
55. _. (1997). Raising School Productivity: An X-Efficiency Approach. Economics of Education Review, 16, 303-11.
56. _, & DeAngelis, K. (1998). Cost-Effectiveness of Reductions in Class Size. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, in process.
57. _, Glass, G. V., & Meister, G. (1987). Cost-Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction. Evaluation Review, 11, 50-72.
58. Means, B., Chelemen, C., & Knapp, M. (Eds.). (1991). Teaching Advanced Skills to At-Risk Students: Views from Research and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
59. Minorini, P., & Sugarman, S. D. (1999). Enabling "Adequacy" to Achieve Reality: Translating Adequacy into State School Finance Distribution Arrangements. In H. F. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance: Issues and Perspectives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
60. Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee Study of Class Size in the Early School Grades. The Future of Children: Critical Issues for Children and Youths, 5, 113-127.
61. Murnane, R., Singer, J., Willett, J., & Kemple, J. (1991). Who Will Teach?: Policies that Matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Note. (1977). Implementation Problems in Institutional Reform Litigation. Harvard Law Review, 91, 428-463.
63. Note. (1980). Judicial Intervention and Organization Theory: Changing Bureaucratic Behavior and Policy. Yale Law Journal, 89, 513-537.
64. Odden, A., & Kelley, C. (1996). Paying Teachers for What They Know and Do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
65. Peltason, J. W. (1955). Federal Courts and the Political Process. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
66. Ragosta, M., Holland, P. W., & Jamison, D. T. (1982). Computer-Assisted Instruction and Compensatory Education: The ETS/LAUSD Study. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
67. Rebell, M. (1998). Fiscal Equity Litigation and the Democratic Imperative. Studies in Judicial Remedies and Public Engagement, 1, 1-33.
68. Rebell, M. A., & Block, A. R. (1982). Educational Policy Making and the Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69. Reed, D. A. (1995). Democracy v. Equality: Legal and Political Struggles over School Finance Equalization. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
70. Rosenberg, G. N. (1991). The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Rossmiller, R. A. (1986). School Finance Reform through Litigation: Expressway or Cul-de-Sac? Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
72. Salmon, R. G., & Alexander, M. D. (1990). State Legislative Responses. In J. K. Underwood & D. A. Verstegen (eds.), The Impacts of Litigation and Legislation on Public School Finance. New York: Ballinger, 249-271.
73. San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973).
74. Serrano v. Priest, 487 P.2d 1241 (Cal. 1971).
75. Silva, F., & Sonstelie, J. (1995). Did Serrano Cause a Decline in School Spending? National Tax Journal, 48, 199-215.
76. Special Project. (1978). The Remedial Process in Institutional Reform Litigation. Columbia Law Review, 78, 784-929.
77. Sternberg, R. (1997). Successful Intelligence. New York: Plume.
78. Stumpf, H. P. (1998). American Judicial Politics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
79. Summers, A., & Wolfe, B. (1977). Do Schools Make a Difference? American Economic Review, 67, 639-652.
80. Symposium. (1991). Investing in Our Children's Future: School Finance Reform in the '90s. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 293-568.
81. Symposium. (1995). Adequacy Litigation in School Finance. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 28, 481-680.
82. Taylor, C. (1998). Does Money Matter? An Empirical Study Introducing Resource Costs and Student Needs to Educational Production Function Analysis. In W. J. Fowler, Jr. (Ed.), Developments in School Finance, 1997. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES 98-212, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, 75-97.
83. Thro, W. E. (1989). To Render Them Safe: The Analysis of State Constitutional Provisions in Public School Finance Reform Litigation. Virginia Law Review, 75, 1639-1679.
84. Underwood, J. K. (1994). School Finance Litigation: Legal Theories, Judicial Activism, and Social Neglect. Journal of Education Finance, 20, 143-162.
85. Wise, A. E. (1967). Rich Schools, Poor Schools: The Promise of Equal Educational Opportunity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86. Wood, R. C. (ed.). (1990). Remedial Law: When Courts Become Administrators. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
87. Yudof, M. G. (1981). Implementation Theories and Desegregation Realities. Alabama Law Review, 32, 441-464.
88. Yudof, M. (1991). School Finance Reform in Texas: The Edgewood Saga. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28, 499-505.