Stereotype threat: When minority members underperform

European Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 243-275

  Maass, Anne ^a   Cadinu, Mara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14644444731     PISSN: 10463283     EISSN: 1479277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10463280340000072     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Allport, GW. 1954. The nature of prejudice
2. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., and Pittinsky, TL. 2001. Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on Quantitative performance. 12: 385–390.
3. Aronson, J., Fried, CB, and Good, C., 2002. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. 38: 113–125.
4. Aronson, J., Lustina, MJ, Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, CM, and Brown, J., 1999. When white men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. 35: 29–46.
5. Blascovich, J., Spencer, SJ, Quinn, D., and Steele, C., 2001. African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. 12: 225–229.
6. Brown, RP, Charnangavej, T., Keough, KA, Newman, ML, and Pentfrow, PJ. 2000. Putting the “affirm” into affirmative action: Preferential selection and academic performance. 79: 736–747.
7. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L., and Latinotti, S., 2003. Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. 33: 267–285.
8. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., and Lombardo, M., 2002. Stereotype threat: The moderating role of individual differences
9. Carnaghi, A., Maass, A., Benetti, A., and Callegari, L., 2003. Affirmative action: Turning a pro-minority policy into a barrier
10. Chacko, TI. 1982. Women and equal employment opportunity: Some unintended effects. 67
11. Cheryan, S., and Bodenhausen, GV. 2000. When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of “Model Minority” status. 11: 399–402.
12. Copeland, JT. 1994. Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioural confirmation. 67: 264–277.
13. Crocker, J., and Major, B., 1989. Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. 96: 608–630.
14. Croizet, J., and Claire, T., 1998. Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socio-economic background. 24: 588–594.
15. Dembo, MH, and Eaton, MJ. 1997. School learning and motivation 65–103.
16. Dion, KL. 1975. Women's reactions to discrimination from members of the same or opposite sex. 9: 294–306.
17. Dweck, CS. 1999. Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality and development
18. Eccles, JS, Wigfield, A., Harold, RD, and Blumenfeld, P., 1993. Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. 64: 830–847.
19. Eccles, JS, Wigfield, A., and Schiefele, U., 1998. Motivation to succeed 1017–1095.
20. Fagot, BI, and Leinbach, MD. 1993. Gender-role development in young children: From discrimination to labeling. 1993: 205–224.
21. Good, CD. 2001. The development of stereotype threat and its relation to theories of intelligence: Effects on elementary school girls' mathematics achievement and task choices
22. Heilman, ME, Block, CJ, and Lucas, JA. 1992. Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. 77: 536–544.
23. Heilman, ME, Lucas, JA, and Kaplow, SR. 1990. Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. 46: 202–216.
24. Hill, KT, and Wigfield, A., 1984. Test anxiety: A major educational problem and what can we do about it. 85: 105–126.
25. Hilton, JL, and Darley, JM. 1985. Constructing other people: A limit on the effect. 21: 1–18.
26. Inzlicht, M., and Ben-Zeev, T., 2000. A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. 11
27. Jussim, L., 1986. Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. 93: 429–445.
28. Keller, C., 2001. Effect of teachers' stereotyping on students' stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain. 141: 165–173.
29. Killen, M., Pisacane, J., Lee-Kim, J., and Ardila-Rey, A., 2001. Fairness or stereotypes? Young children's priorities when evaluating group exclusion and inclusion. 37: 587–596.
30. Leyens, J-P, Desert, M., Croizet, J-C, and Darcis, C., 2000. Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat?. 26: 1189–1199.
31. Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Verga, S., and Crimaldi, S., 2002. Preventing stereotype-induced memory deficits among the elderly: The Levi-Montalcini effect
32. Major, B., McCoy, SK, Kaiser, CR, and Quinton, WJ. Prejudice and self-esteem: A transactional model. 1477–104.
33. Martin, CL. 1993. New directions for investigating children's gender knowledge. 13: 184–204.
34. Marx, T., and Roman, JS. 2002. Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. 28: 1183–1193.
35. McIntyre, RB, Paulson, RM, and Lord, CG. 2003. Alleviating women's mathematics stereptype threat through salience of group achievements. 39: 83–90.
36. Merton, RK. 1948. The self-fulfilling prophecy. 8: 192–210.
37. Mezzapesa. 1999. La minaccia legata allo stereotipo: Effetti su un campione di meridionali [Stereotype threat: Effects on a Southern-Italian sample]
38. Osborne, JW. 2001. Testing stereotype threat: Does anxiety explain race and sex differences in achievement?. 26: 291–310.
39. Pinel, EC. 2002. Stigma consciousness in intergroup contexts: the power of conviction. 38: 178–185.
40. Pintrich, PR, Marx, RW, and Boyle, RA. 1993. Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. 63: 167–199.
41. Rosenthal, R., 1994. Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. 3: 176–179.
42. Rosenthal, R., and Jacobson, L., 1968. Pygmalion in the classroom
43. Schmader, T., 2002. Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. 38: 194–201.
44. Sekaquaptewa, D., and Thompson, M., 2003. Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women's performance. 39: 68–74.
45. Shih, M., Pittinsky, TL, and Ambady, N., 1999. Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. 10: 80–83.
46. Signorella, ML, Bigler, RS, and Liben, LS. 1993. Developmental diffferences in children's gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. 13: 147–183.
47. Snyder, M., and Haugen, JA. 1995. Why does behavioural confirmation occur? A functional perspective on the role of the target. 21: 963–974.
48. Snyder, M., and Stukas, AA. 1999. Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioural activities in social interaction. 50: 273–303.
49. Spencer, SJ, Steele, CM, and Quinn, DM. 1999. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. 35: 4–28.
50. Stangor, C., Carr, C., and Kiang, L., 1998. Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. 75: 1191
51. Steele, CM, and Aronson, J., 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. 69: 797–811.
52. Stone, J., Lynch, CI, Sjomeling, M., and Darley, JM. 1999. Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. 77: 1213–1227.
53. Stukas, AA, and Snyder, M., 2002. Target's awareness of expectations and behavioural confirmation in ongoing interactions. 38: 31–40.
54. Svenson, O., and Maule, AJ. 1993. Time pressure and stress in human judgement and decision making
55. Swim, JK, and Stangor, C., 1998. Prejudice: The target's perspective
56. Tiedemann, J., 2000. Parents' gender stereotypes and teachers' beliefs as predictors of children's concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. 92: 144–151.
57. Thompson, SK. 1975. Gender labels and early sex role development. 46: 339–347.
58. Turner, ME, and Pratkanis, AR. 1993. Effects of preferential and meritorious selection on performance: An intuitive and self-handicapping perspective. 19: 47–58.
59. Valian, V., 1998. Why so slow? The advancement of women
60. Vorauer, JD, and Miller, DT. 1997. Failure to recognize the effect of implicit social influence on the presentation of the self. 73: 281–295.
61. Walsh, M., Hickey, C., and Duffy, J., 1999. Influence of item content and stereotype situation on gender differences in mathematical problem solving. 41: 219–240.
62. Wigfield, A., 1994. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. 6: 49–78.
63. Wigfield, A., and Eccles, JS. 1992. The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. 12: 265–310.
64. Wigfield, A., and Eccles, JS. 2000. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. 25: 68–81.
65. Wigfield, A., Eccles, JS, Yoon, KS, Harold, RD, Arbreton, A., and Freedman-Doan, K., 1997. Changes in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across elementary school years: A three-year study. 89: 451–469.