Local contextual cuing in visual search

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 31-38

  Hoffmann, Joachim ^a   Sebald, Albrecht ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Context effects; Cuing; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; VISION;

ADULT; CUES; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 14644438568     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.1.31     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Antes, J. R., Penland, J. G., & Metzger, R. L. (1981). Processing global information in briefly presented pictures. Psychological Research, 43, 277-292.
2. Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80.
3. Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 556-566.
4. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
5. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 2224-2234.
6. Czerwinski, M., Lightfoot, N., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Automatization and training in visual search. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 271-315.
7. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
8. Hartman, M., Knopman, D. S., & Nissen, M. J. (1989). Implicit learning of new verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1070-1082.
9. Hoffmann, J. (1995). Visual object recognition. In W. Prinz & B. Bridgeman (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action. Volume 1: Perception (pp. 297-344). London: Harcourt Brace.
10. Hoffmann, J., & Klein, R. (1988). Kontexteffekte bei der Benennung und Entdeckung von Objekten [Context effects with the naming and detection of objects]. Sprache und Kognition, 7, 25-39.
11. Hoffmann, J., & Kunde, W. (1999). Location-specific target expectancies in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1127-1141.
12. Hoffmann, J., Martin, C., & Schilling, A. (2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67, 160-173.
13. Hoffmann, J., & Zießler, Ch. (1983). Objektidentifikation in künstlichen Begriffshierarchien [Object identification in artificial concept hierarchies]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 191, 135-167.
14. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105-1124.
15. Jiménez, L. (Ed.) (2003). Attention and implicit learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
16. Jiménez, L., & Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 236-259.
17. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
18. Jolicoeur, P., Snow, D., & Murray, J. (1987). The time to identify disoriented letters: Effects of practice and font. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 303-316.
19. Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (1998). Über die Wahl von Referenzsystemen in der visuellen Suche [On the choice of reference systems in the visual search]. In U. Kotkamp & W. Krause (Eds.), Intelligente Informationsverarbeitung [Intelligent information processing] (pp. 121-130). Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
20. Meyers, L. S., & Rhoades, R. W. (1978). Visual search of common scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 297-310.
21. Miller, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 453-471.
22. Musen, G. (1996). Effects of task demands on implicit memory for object-location associations. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 104-113.
23. Musen, G., & Viola, J. (2000). Attentional requirements for object-location priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 646-653.
24. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
25. Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 1-32.
26. O'Hara, W. (1980). Evidence in support of word unitization. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 390-402.
27. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273-302.
28. Palmer, S. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519-526.
29. Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 324-354.
30. Salasoo, A., Shiffrin, R. M., & Feustel, T. C. (1985). Building permanent memory codes: codification and repetition effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 50-77.
31. Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J.-P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-53.
32. Schyns, P. G., & Murphy, G. L. (1994). The ontogeny of part representation in object concepts. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 31, pp. 305-354). San Diego: Academic.
33. Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 586-598.
34. Shaw, M. L., & Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 211-211.
35. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
36. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 693-716.
37. Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.