Impact of diet-related cancer prevention messages written with cognitive and affective arguments on message characteristics, stage of change, and self-efficacy

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 12-19

  Quintiliani, Lisa M ^a   Carbone, Elena T ^b  

^a IL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Nutrition education; Persuasive communication; Risk reduction behavior; Self efficacy; Stage of change

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CANCER PREVENTION; CAUCASIAN; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SAMPLE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; TELEPHONE; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 14644427779     PISSN: 14994046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60254-6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Kreuter MW, Strecher VJ, Glassman B. One size does not fit all: the case for tailoring print messages. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21:276-283.
2. Bull FC, Kreuter MW, Scharff DP. Effects of tailored, personalized, and general health messages on physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;36:181-192.
3. Tessaro I, Campbell M, Benedict S, et al. Developing a worksite health promotion intervention: health works for women. Am J Health Behav. 1998;22:434-442.
4. Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ, Ammerman AS, DeVellis RF, Sandler RS. Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:783-787.
5. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, et al. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med. 1999;21:290-298.
6. Petty RE, Priester JR. Mass media attitude change: implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Bryant J, Zillman D, eds. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1994:91-122.
7. Kreuter MW, Oswald DL, Bull FC, Clark EM. Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials? Health Educ Res. 2000;15:305-315.
8. van Assema P, Martens M, Ruiter RA, Brug J. Framing of nutrition education messages in persuading consumers of the advantages of a healthy diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001;14:435-442.
9. Paul CL, Redman S, Sanson-Fisher RW. Print material and design: is it relevant to effectiveness? Health Educ Res. 2003;18:181-190.
10. Williams-Piehota P, Schneider TR, Pizarro J, Mowad L, Salovey P. Matching health messages to information processing styles: need for cognition and mammography utilization. Health Commun. 2003;15: 375-392.
11. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Prog Behav Modif. 1992;28:183-218.
12. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
13. Greene GW, Rossi SR, Reed GR, Willey C, Prochaska JO. Stages of change for reducing dietary fat to 30% of energy or less. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:1105-1110.
14. Campbell MK, Honess-Morreale D, Farrell D, Carbone E, Brasure M. A tailored multimedia nutrition education pilot program for low-income women receiving food assistance. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:257-267.
15. Carbone ET, Campbell MK, Honess-Morreale L. Use of cognitive interview techniques in the development of nutrition surveys and interactive nutrition messages for low-income populations. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:690-696.
16. Campbell MK, Reynolds KD, Havas S, et al. Stages of change for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among adults and young adults participating in the National 5-a-Day for Better Health community studies. Health Educ Behav. 1999;26:513-534.
17. Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Toley EE, McNeil ET. Qualitative Methods: A Field Guide for Applied Research on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International; 2002.
18. Baranowski T, Weber Cullen K, Baranowski J. Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake: advancing dietary intervention. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19:17-40.
19. Baranowski T, Anderson C, Carmack C. Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:266-297.