Alternate-response preparation in a visuomotor serial task

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 127-135

  Gómez, Carlos M ^a   Vaquero, E ^a   Vazquez M ^a   Gonzalez Rosa J J ^a   Cardoso, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Gambler's fallacy; Inhibition of return (IOR); Lateralized readiness potential (LRP); Motor intention; Stimulus response mapping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 14644418556     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.37.2.127-135     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anllo-Vento, L., Luck, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1998). Spatio-temporal dynamics of attention to color: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 216-218.
2. Bertelson, P., & Renkin, A. (1966). Reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task as a function of response-signal time interval. Acta Psychologica, 25, 132-136.
3. Clark, V., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170-187.
4. Coles, M. G., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.
5. Csibra, G., Johnson, M. H., & Tucker, L. (1997). Attention and oculomotor control: A high-density study of the gap effect. Neuropsychology, 3(6), 855-865.
6. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
7. Delinte, A., Gómez, C. M., Decostre, M. F., Crommelinck, M., & Roucoux, A. (2002). Amplitude transition function of human express saccades. Neuroscience Research, 42(2), 21-34.
8. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 343-350.
9. Eimer, M. (1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Compuers, 30, 146-156.
10. Fischer, B., & Weber, H. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention. Behavioral Brain Science, 16, 553-610.
11. Goldberg, M. E., & Segraves, M. A. (1987). Visuospatial and motor attention in the monkey. Neuropsychologia, 251(1A), 107-118.
12. Gómez, C. M., Atienza, M., Gómez, G. J., & Vázquez, M. (1996). Response latencies and event-related potentials during the gap paradigm using saccadic responses in human subjects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 91-99.
13. Gómez, C. M., Clark, V. P., Fan, S., Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 7(1), 41-51.
14. Gómez, C. M., Delinte, A., Vaquera, E., Vázquez, M., Atienza, M., Millán, S., et al. (2002). Sensory and motor, attentional modulation in the manual gap effect. A high-density ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 385-394.
15. Gómez, C. M., Delinte, A., Vaquero, E., Vázquez, M., Cardoso, M. J., Crommelinck, M., et al. (2001). Preparatory activation of a dynamic visuo-motor cortical network in human subjects. Brain Topography, 13(3), 149-159.
16. Gómez, C. M., Marco, J., & Grau, C. (2003). Visuo-motor cortical network of the contingent negative variation. NeuroImage, 20(1), 216-224.
17. Gómez, C. M., Millán, S., Atienza, M., Aguilar, H., & Delinte, A. (1998). The gap effect during visual and auditory stimulation using manual responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 77-96.
18. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194-203.
19. Jentzsch, I., & Sommer, W. (2001). Sequence-sensitive subcomponents of P300: Topographical analyses and dipole source localization. Psychophysiology, 38(4), 607-621.
20. Kirby, N. H. (1980). Sequential effects in choice reaction time. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 129-172). London: Academic Press.
21. Leuthold, H., & Sommer, W. (1993). Stimulus presentation rate dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction time. Psychophysiology, 30, 510-517.
22. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology, 31(3), 291-308.
23. Mangun, G. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology, 32, 4-18.
24. Pashler, H., & Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(1), 33-48.
25. Polk, T. A., Stallcup, M., Aguirre, G. K., Alsop, D. C., D'Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., et al. (2002). Neural specialization for letter recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(2), 145-159.
26. Praamstra, P., & Oostenveld, R. (2003). Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: A high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 309-322.
27. Simon, J. R., & Craft, J. L. (1989). The effect of prediction accuracy on choice reaction time. Memory and Cognition, 17(4), 503-508.
28. Soetens, E. (1997). Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 547-568.
29. Valle-Inclàn, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43(2), 147-162.
30. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 15(6), 1047-1060.