Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities

Behavioral Sciences and the Law

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-20

  Schur, Lisa ^a,b,c   Kruse, Douglas ^a,d,e   Blanck, Peter ^e,f,g,h,i  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^g The University of Iowa   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF LAW   (United States)

ⁱ STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIOR; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; DISABILITY; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EMPLOYABILITY; EMPLOYEE; EMPLOYMENT; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES; WORKPLACE;

ARCHITECTURAL ACCESSIBILITY; ATTITUDE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; EMPLOYMENT; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 14644417252     PISSN: 07353936     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.624     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Annenberg Washington Program. (1994). Communicating the Americans with Disabilities Act: Transcending compliance - A case report on Sears Roebuck & Co. (White Paper). Washington, DC: Blanck.
2. Annenberg Washington Program. (1996). Communicating the Americans with Disabilities Act: Transcending compliance - 1996 follow-up report on Sears Roebuck & Co. Washington, DC: Blanck.
3. Ashkanasy, N., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of organizational culture and climate. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Baker, M. Q., & Rivera, I., Jr. (1999). Redefining accessibility: The effort to become fully inclusive must be extended across all line. Association Management, 51(8), 57-60.
5. Blanck, P. (1997). The economics of the employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Part I - workplace accommodations. DePaul Law Review, 46, 877-914.
6. Blanck, P. (2001). Civil war pensions and disability. Ohio State Law Journal, 62, 109-249.
7. Blanck, P., Hill, E., Siegal, C., & Waterstone, M. (2003a). Disability civil rights law and policy. St. Paul, MN: Thomson-West.
8. Blanck, P., & Marti, M. W. (1997). Attitudes, behavior, and the employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Villanova Law Review, 42, 345-408.
9. Blanck, P., Ritchie, H., Schmeling, J. L., & Klein, D. (2003b). Technology for independence: A community-based resource center. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 51-62.
10. Blanck, P. D., Sandler, L. A., Schmeling, J. L., & Schartz, H. A. (2000). The emerging workforce of entrepreneurs with disabilities: Preliminary study of entrepreneurship in Iowa. Iowa Law Review, 85, 1583-1668.
11. Blanck, P., & Schartz, H. A. (2001). Toward researching a national employment policy for persons with disabilities. In 22nd Mary E. Switzer Memorial Seminar: Emerging: workforce issues: WIA, Ticket to work, and partnerships. Alexandria, VA: National Rehabilitation Association.
12. Blanck, P., Schur, L., Kruse, D., Schwochau, S., & Song, C. (2003c). Calibrating the impact of the ADA's employment provisions. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 14, 267-290.
13. Blanck, P., & Song, C. (2002). Civil war pension attorneys and disability politics. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 35, 137-217.
14. Blanck, P. D., & Steele, P. (1998). The emerging role of the staffing industry in the employment of persons with disabilities: A case report on Manpower Inc. Iowa City, Iowa. The University of Iowa Law, Health Policy, and Disability Center.
15. Boyle, M. A. (1997). Social barriers to successful reentry into mainstream organizational culture: Perceptions of people with disabilities. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8, 259-268.
16. Bruyère, S. (2000). Disability employment policies and practices in private and federal sector organizations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Program on Employment and Disability.
17. Burkhauser, R., Houtenville, A. J., & Wittenburg D. C. (2003). A user's guide to current statistics on the employment of people with disabilities. In D. Stapleton, & R. Burkhauser (Eds.), The decline in the employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle (pp. 23-86). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
18. Christensen, C., & Shu, K. (1999). What is an organization's culture? (Case Study 9-399-104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Harvard Business School.
19. Colella, A. (1996). Organizational socialization of newcomers with disabilities: A framework for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 14, 351-417.
20. Colella, A. (2001). Coworker distributive fairness judgments of the workplace accommodation of employees with disabilities. Academy of Management Review, 26, 100-116.
21. Colella, A., DeNisi, A. S., & Varma, A. (1998). The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: The role of disability-job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 102-111.
22. Dixon, K. A., Kruse, D., & Van Horn, C. E. (2003). Restricted access: A survey of employers about people with disabilities and lowering barriers to work. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development.
23. Eriksson, K. (1999). Linking social science working life research and work reform: A role for universities. In D. J. Greenwood (Ed.), Action research: From practice to writing in an international action research development program (pp. 131-146). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
24. Gilbert, J., & Ivancevich, J. (2000). Valuing diversity: A tale of two organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 93-105.
25. Gunderson, M., & Hyatt, D. (1996). Do injured workers pay for reasonable accommodation? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50, 92-103.
26. Harlan, S., & Robert, P. (1998). The social construction of disability in organizations: Why employers resist reasonable accommodations. Work and Occupations, 25, 397-435.
27. Harris Interactive, Inc. (2000). 2000 N. O. D./Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. New York.
28. Kaye, H. S. (2003). Employment and the changing disability population. In D. Stapleton, & R. Burkhauser (Eds.), The decline in the employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle (pp. 217-258). Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
29. Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., et al. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42, 3-21.
30. Kruse, D., & Schur, L. (2003). Employment of people with disabilities following the ADA. Industrial Relations, 42, 31-66.
31. Lawrence, C. R., III. (1987). The Id, the ego, and equal protection: Reckoning with unconscious racism. Stanford Law Review, 39, 317-388.
32. Lewin, D., & Schecter, S. (1995 Supplement). Four factors lower disability rates. Personnel Journal, 74(11), 14-15.
33. Lewin, K. (1948). Group decision and social change. In T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 330-341). New York: Holt.
34. Makas, E. (1988). Positive attitudes toward disabled people: Disabled and nondisabled persons' perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 49-61.
35. McTaggart, R. (1997). Guiding principles for participatory action research. In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences (pp. 25-43). Albany: State University of New York.
36. Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap and Society, 7, 101-114.
37. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Reichers, A., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. Rousseau, D. (1990). Assessing organizational culture: The case for multiple methods. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 153-192). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Rubinstein, S. (2000). The impact of co-management on quality performance: The case of the Saturn Corporation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53, 197-218.
41. Sandler, L., & Blanck, P. (2005). Accessibility as a corporate article of faith at Microsoft: Case study of corporate culture and human resource dimensions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22 (this issue).
42. Schartz, K., Schartz, H., & Blanck, P. (2002). Employment of persons with disabilities in information technology jobs: A literature review for 'IT Works.' Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 637-657.
43. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. Schein, E. H. (1999). The corporate culture survival guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Schur, L. (2002a). The difference a job makes: The effects of employment among people with disabilities. Journal of Economic Issues, 36, 339-348.
46. Schur, L. A. (2002b). Dead-end jobs or a path to economic well-being? The consequences of non-standard work among people with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 601-620.
47. Schur, L. A. (2003). Barriers or opportunities? The causes of contingent and part-time work among people with disabilities. Industrial Relations, 42, 589-622.
48. Schur, L., & Kruse, D. (2002). Non-standard work arrangements and disability income. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Disability Research Institute.
49. Scott, D., & Usher, R. (1996). Understanding educational research. New York: Routledge.
50. Spataro, S. E. (2005). Diversity in context: How organizational culture affects the consequences of demographic diversity in organizations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law (this issue).
51. Stapleton, D. C., & Burkhauser, R. (Eds.). (2003). The decline in the employment of people with disabilities: A policy puzzle. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
52. Stone, D., & Colella, A. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21, 352-401.
53. Stringer, E. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Table QT-P21: Disability status by sex. Retrieved March 23, 2004, from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ DatasetTableListServlet?_ds_name=DEC_2000_SF3_U&_lang=en
55. U.S. Census Bureau. (2002a). Disability: Selected characteristics of persons 16 to 74. Retrieved March 23, 2004, from http: //www.census.gov/hhes/ www/disable/cps/cps102.html
56. U.S. Census Bureau. (2002b). Disability labor force status - work disability status of civilians 16 to 74 years old, by educational attainment and sex. Retrieved March 23, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disable/cps/ cps202.html
57. Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58. Wilgosh, L. R., & Skaret, D. (1987). Employer attitudes toward hiring individuals with disabilities: A review of the recent literature. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 1, 89-98.
59. Yandrick, R. M. (1997, June). Speed your disabled worker's return. HR Magazine, 42, 154-157.