Cytologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ in fine-needle aspiration of the breast mirror the histopathologic growth pattern heterogeneity and grading

Cancer

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 21-27

  Sauer, Torill ^a   Løma, Jon ^a   Garred, Øystein ^a   Næss, Oddvar ^a  

^a ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Breast; Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC); Grading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CYTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MYOEPITHELIUM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS;

EID: 14644412470     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20735     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Oslo, Norway Cancer Registry. Cancer in Norway 2001. Oslo: Institute of Epidemiologic Cancer Research, 2004.
2. Shoker BS, Sloane JP. DCIS grading schemes and clinical implications. Histopathology. 1999;35:393-400.
3. Silverstein MJ, Poller DN, Waisman J, et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in situ. Lancet. 1995; 345:1154-1157.
4. Lilleng R, Hagmar B. The comedo subtype of intraductal carcinoma. Cytologic characteristics. Acta Cytol. 1992;36: 345-352.
5. Lilleng R, Hagmar B, Farrants G. Low-grade cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Acta Cytol. 1992;36(1): 48-54.
6. Malamud YR, Ducatman BS, Wang HH. Comparative features of comedo and noncomedo ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol. 1992;8(6):571-576.
7. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B, et al. The cytopathology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. A detailed analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of 58 cases compared with 101 invasive ductal carcinomas. Cytopathology. 2001;12: 107-119.
8. Lindholm K. Breast. In: Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN-I, Whitaker D, editors. Manual and atlas of fine needle aspiration cytology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1999:172-181.
9. McKee G, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: invasive vs. in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;25(1):73-77.
10. Sauer T, Young K, Thoresen SØ. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the work-up of mammographic and ultrasonographic findings in breast cancer screening: an attempt at differentiating in situ and invasive carcinoma. Cytopathology. 2002;13(2):101-110.
11. Sauer T, Myrvold K, Lømo J, Anderssen KY, Skanne P. Fine-needle aspiration cytology in non-palpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996-2001. Breast. 2003;12:314-319.
12. Shin HJ, Sneige N. Is a diagnosis of infiltrating versus in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast possible in fine-needle aspiration specimens? Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 1998;84:186-191.
13. Silverman JF, Masood S, Ducatman BS, Wang HH, Sneige N. Can FNA biopsy separate atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast? Diagn Cytopathol. 1993;9:713-728.
14. Venegas R, Ritgers JL, Cameron BL, Vargas H, Butler JA. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Acta Cytol. 1994;38:136-143
15. Wang HH, Ducatman BS, Eick D. Comparative features of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;92:736-740.
16. Cangiarella J, Waisman J, Simsir A. Cytologic findings with histologic correlation in 43 cases of mammary intraductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol. 2003;47:965-972.
17. Klijanienko J, Katsahian S, Vielh P, Masood S. Stromal infiltration as a predictor of tumor invasion in breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30(3):182-186.
18. Kumarasinghe MP, Poh WT. Differentiating nonhigh-grade duct carcinoma in situ from benign breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2004;30:98-102.
19. Tavassoli FA, Hoefler H, Rosai J, et al. Intraductal proliferative lesions. In: Fattaneh A, Tavassoli A, Devilee P, editors. Tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: Oxford University Press, 2002:63-73.
20. Kåresen R, Jensen HH, Sauer T, Schlichting E, Skaane P, Wang HH. Logistics of referral, diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with breast symptoms and signs. Scand J Surg. 2002;91:232-238.
21. McKee GT, Tildsley G, Hammond S. Cytologic diagnosis and grading of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 1999;87(4):203-209.
22. Grading of invasive carcinoma of the breast. In: Elston CW, editor. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone, 1987:300-312.
23. Bloom H, Richardson W. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1957;11:359-377.
24. Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Prediction of invasiveness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;17(5):315-320.
25. Frost AR, Tabbara SO, Poprocky LA, Weiss H, Sidawy MK. Cytologic features of proliferative breast disease. A study designed to minimize sampling error. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2000;90(1):33-40.
26. Sidawy MK, Tabbara SO, Bryan JA, Poprocky LA, Frost AR. The spectrum of cytologic features in nonproliferative breast lesions. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2001;93(2):140-145.
27. Simsir A, Waisman J, Thorner K, Cangiarella J. Mammary lesions diagnosed as "papillary" by aspiration biopsy. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2003;99(3):156-165.