Stromal Infiltration as a Predictor of Tumor Invasion in Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 182-186

  Klijanienko, Jerzy ^a   Katsahian, Sandrine ^a   Vielh, Philippe ^a   Masood, Shahla ^b  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Fine needle aspiration; In situ; Invasive; Prediction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA IN SITU; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER INVASION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; ECHOGRAPHY; EOSINOPHIL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STROMA; STROMA INFILTRATION; TUMOR NECROSIS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STROMAL CELLS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 1542275650     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.10425     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Martin HE, Ellis EB. Biopsy of needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg 1930;92:169-181.
2. Zajicek J, Franzen S, Jakobsson P, Rubio C, Unsgaard B. Aspiration biopsy of mammary tumors in diagnosis and research - a critical review of 2,200 cases. Acta Cytol 1967;11:169-175.
3. Franzen S, Zajicek J. Aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of palpable lesions of the breast, clinical review of 3479 consecutive biopsies. Acta Radiol 1968;7:241-262.
4. Salter DR, Bassett AA. Role of needle aspiration in reducing number of necessary breast biopsies. Can Surg 1981;24:311-313.
5. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, Donohue JH, Sykes MW, Karsell PR, Coffey SL, Jung SH. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:815-820.
6. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, Aucreman CJ, Cardenosa G, Cink TM, Coscia JL, Eklund GW, Evans WP, Garver PR, Gramm HF, Hass DK, Jacob KM, Kelly KM, Killebrew LK, Lechner MC, Perlman SJ, Smid AP, Tabar L, Taber FE, Wynn RT. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-364.
7. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzani FA. Stereotaxic large-size needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193:91-95.
8. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Giess CS, Cohen MA, Abramson AF, Hann LE. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology 1995;194:379-381.
9. Lee CH, Carter D, Philpotts LE, Couce ME, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Tocino I. Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stareotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted? Radiology 2000;217:466-470.
10. Klijanienko J, Côté JF, Thibault F, Zafrani B, Meunier M, Clough K, Asselain B, Vielh P. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of infraclinic breast lesions. A study at the Institut Curie of 198 cases histologically correlated. Cancer 1998;84:36-41.
11. Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Prediction of invasiveness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:315-320.
12. Maygarden SJ, Brock MS, Novotny DB. Are epithelial cells in fat or connective tissue a reliable indicator of tumor invasion in fine-needle aspiration of the breast? Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:137-142.
13. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Auto Control 1974;19:716-723.
14. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley, 1989. p 140-145.
15. Masood S. Fibrocystic change. High risk and premalignant breast disease. In: Masood S, Cytopathology of the breast. Chicago, IL: ASCP, 1995. p 167-202.
16. Silverman J, Masood S, Ducartman B, et al. Can FNA biopsy separate atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast? Cytomorphologic criteria and limitations in diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:713-728.
17. Squires E, Betsill W. Inracystic carcinoma of the breast: a correlation of cytomorphology, gross pathology, microscopic pathology, and clinical data. Acta Cytol 1981;25:267-271.
18. Corkill ME, Sneige N, Fanning T, el-Naggar A. Fine-needle aspiration cytology and flow cytometry of intracystic papillary carcinoma of breast. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;94:673-680.
19. Chhieng DC, Fernadez G, Cangiarella FJ, Cohen JM, Waisman J, Harris MN, Roses DF, Shapiro RL, Symmans WF. Invasive carcinoma is clinically suspicious breast masses diagnosed as adenocarcinoma by fine needle aspiration. Cancer 2000;90:96-101.
20. Theocharus C, Greenberg ML. Cytologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;15:367-373.
21. Masood S, Frykberg ER, McLellan GL, Scalapino MC, Mitchum DG, Bullard JB. Prospective evaluation of radiologically detected fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Cancer 1990;66:1480-1487.
22. Masood S, Frykenberg ER, McLellan GL, Dee S, Bullard JB. Cytologic differentiation between proliferative and nonproliferative breast disease in mammographically guided fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 1991;7:581-590.
23. McKee GT, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: invasive vs in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25:73-77.
24. McKee GT, Tildsley G, Hammond S. Cytologic diagnosis and grading of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 1999;87:203-209.
25. Shin HJC, Sneige N. Is a diagnosis of infiltrating versus in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast possible in fine-needle aspiration specimens? Cancer 1998;84:186-191.