Fine-needle aspiration cytology in nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities in breast cancer screening: Results from the breast cancer screening programme in Oslo 1996-2001

Breast

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 314-319

  Sauer, Torill ^a   Myrvold, Kristina ^a   Lømo, Jon ^a   Anderssen, Karin Yvonne ^a   Skaane, Per ^a  

^a ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Breast carcinoma; DCIS; Fine needle aspiration; Grid plate; Nonpalpable lesion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NORWAY; PALPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMEAR; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 0142260978     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00102-4     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Accinelli G, Mano M P, Bordon R, Fessia L. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1998; 18(6): 462-467.
2. Fessia L, Botta G, Arisio R, Varga M, Aimone V. Fine-needle aspiration of breast lesions: role and accuracy in a review of 7495 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1987; 3(2): 121-125.
3. Hammond S, Keyhani-Rofhaga S, O'Toole R V. Statistical analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of 678 cases plus 4265 cases from the literature. Acta Cytol 1987; 31(3): 276-280.
4. Sneige N. Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: a review of 1995 cases with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(1): 106-112.
5. Frost A R, Tabbara S O, Poprocky L A, Weiss H, Sidawy M K. Cytologic features of proliferative breast disease. A study designed to minimize sampling error. Cancer Cytopathol 2000; 90(1): 33-40.
6. Sidawy M K, Tabbara S O, Bryan J A, Poprocky L A, Frost A R. The spectrum of cytologic features in nonproliferative breast lesions. Cancer Cytopathol 2001; 93(2): 140-145.
7. Lilleng R, Hagmar B. The comedo subtype of intraductal carcinoma. Cytologic characteristics. Acta Cytol 1992; 36(3): 345-352.
8. Lindholm K. Breast. In: Orell S R, Sterrett G F, Walters M N-I, Whitaker D, eds. Manual and Atlas of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1999; 172-181.
9. McKee G, Tambouret R H, Finkelstein D. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: invasive vs in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 2001; 25(1): 73-77.
10. Shin H J, Sneige N. Is a diagnosis of infiltrating versus in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast possible in fine-needle aspiration specimens? Cancer Cytopathol 1998; 84(3): 186-191.
11. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B, Cristofori A, Bricolo D, Natale N et al. The cytopathology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. A detailed analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of 58 cases compared with 101 invasive ductal carcinomas. Cytopathology 2001; 12: 107-119.
12. Sauer T, Young K, Thoresen S Ø. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the work-up of mammographic and ultrasonographic findings in breast cancer screening: an attempt at differentiating in situ and invasive carcinoma. Cytopathology 2002; 13(2): 101-110.
13. Theocharous C, Greenberg M L. Cytologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 15(5): 367-373.
14. Venegas R, Ritgers J L, Cameron B L, Vargas H, Butler J A. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Acta Cytol 1994; 38(2): 136-143.
15. Wang H H, Ducatman B S, Eick D. Comparative features of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 92(6): 736-740.
16. Lilleng R, Hagmar B, Farrants G. Low-grade cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Acta Cytol 1992; 36(1): 48-54.
17. Silverman J F, Masood S, Ducatman B S, Wang H H, Sneige N. Can FNA biopsy separate atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast? Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9(6): 713-728.
18. Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Prediction of invasiveness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17(5): 315-320.
19. Wells C A, Perera R, White F E, Domizio P. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the UK breast screening programme: a national audit of results. Breast 1999; 8: 261-266.
20. Mitnick J S, Vazquez M F, Pressman P I, Harris M N, Roses D F. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the evaluation of nonpalpable lesions: report of an experience based on 2988 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3(2): 185-191.
21. Pisano E D, Fajardo L L, Tsimikas J, Sneige N, Frable W J, Gatsonis CA et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesion in a multicenter clinical trial. Cancer 1998; 82(4): 679-688.
22. Pisano E D, Fajardo L L, Caudry D J, Sneige N, Frable W J, Berg W A et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology 2001; 219(3): 785-792.
23. Britton P D, McCann J. Needle biopsy in the NHS Breast Screening programme 1996/97: how much and how accurate? Breast 1999; 8: 5-11.
24. Verkooijen H M. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 2002; 99: 853-859.
25. Kåresen R, Jensen H H, Sauer T, Schlichting E, Skaane P, Wang H H. Logistics of referral, diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with breast symptoms and signs. Scand J Surg 2002; 91: 232-238.